Autism in women is often diagnosed later in life compared to men. Some reasons for this late diagnosis include:
- Historical male-focus of autism research, leading to a lack of understanding of female autism presentation
- Masking or camouflaging of autistic traits by women to fit in with social norms and expectations
- Misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis due to overlapping symptoms with other conditions like anxiety or eating disorders
- Gender stereotypes and biases among healthcare professionals, leading to dismissal of women’s concerns
- Lack of recognition of the unique challenges faced by autistic women, such as navigating social relationships and gender roles
Late diagnosis can have significant consequences for autistic women’s mental health, self-understanding, and access to support services.
However, receiving a diagnosis can provide a framework for understanding one’s experiences, allowing autistic women to embrace their authentic selves and live more freely without the pressure to mask or conform to societal expectations.

Seers, K., & Hogg, R. (2023). “Fake it ‘till you make it”: Authenticity and wellbeing in late diagnosed autistic women. Feminism & Psychology, 33(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221101455
Key Points
- The study explored the experiences of late-diagnosed autistic women, focusing on the intersection of gender and autism spectrum condition (ASC). The main findings highlight the challenges these women faced in living outside gendered social norms, the psychological and emotional consequences of masking their autistic traits, and the impact of the diagnosis on their identity and well-being.
- Factors like early marginalization, pressure to conform to gendered expectations, and lack of recognition of female ASC presentation significantly affected the women’s sense of self and mental health. Masking was a common coping strategy, but it often led to exhaustion, identity confusion, and psychological distress.
- The research, while enlightening, has certain limitations such as a small, self-selecting sample and lack of representation of self-diagnosed individuals or those with co-morbidities.
- Understanding the experiences of autistic women is crucial for improving diagnostic processes, support services, and societal acceptance of neurodiversity.
Rationale
Autism spectrum condition (ASC) has historically been researched and diagnosed with a male-centric lens, leading to a lack of recognition and understanding of the female ASC phenotype (Bargiela et al., 2016; Zener, 2019).
Autistic girls and women are more likely to be diagnosed later in life, often after experiencing challenges in social situations, relationships, and mental health (Gould & Ashton-Smith, 2011; Zener, 2019).
To address this gender discrepancy, recent research has begun exploring the unique experiences and presentations of ASC in females (Baldwin & Costley, 2015; Cridland et al., 2014).
The current study builds upon this growing body of research by utilizing a qualitative approach informed by feminist disability theory to delve deeper into how the intersection of gender and ASC influences autistic women’s sense of self and well-being.
By centering the voices of late-diagnosed autistic women, this study aims to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the female ASC experience and inform improvements in diagnostic tools, clinical practices, and support services.
Method
This qualitative study employed a purposive sampling technique to recruit eight late-diagnosed autistic women residing in Australia.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted, allowing participants to discuss issues they felt were essential to the topic. Interviews were anonymized, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by critical feminist theory.
The researchers familiarised themselves with the data through multiple readings, coded for similarities and differences in experiences, and constructed themes that addressed the intersections of gender and ASC.
Power dynamics and the politics of representation were considered throughout the coding and analysis process, consistent with feminist research practices (Bailey, 2011).
Sample
The eight participants, aged between 24 and 53 years (mean age = 39.12, SD = 9.3), had received formal diagnoses of Asperger’s Syndrome or ASC, with an average age at diagnosis of 36.75 years.
One participant identified as culturally diverse, but socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and nationality were not recorded for the sample.
Results
The study identified two core themes: “Managing and masking the self” and “Lost identity found: Finding the authentic self.”
The first theme encompassed participants’ experiences of masking their autistic traits to meet social expectations and reduce vulnerability. Masking was described as both a natural and planned behavior with psychological consequences.
As ‘Sally’ shared,
“I’ve been conditioned to do it [in] non-visible ways, so I clench my toes, I press my toes into the floor or into my shoes, I mash my teeth together, [that] is one of my stims [demonstrates], clicking, socially acceptable things, like clicking my pen, or chewing.”
The second theme explored the impact of diagnosis on participants’ identity and well-being. Receiving a diagnosis provided a framework for understanding past experiences and allowed participants to embrace their authentic selves.
‘Maisy’ expressed,
“just knowing, that is quite a relief and the other sense or feeling I got after I had processed the whole diagnosis was one of joy, and it wasn’t just your everyday happiness, it was a very heighten[ed] joyfulness.”
Insight and Depth
This study is particularly informative as it sheds light on the complex interplay between gender norms, societal expectations, and the experience of being an autistic woman.
The findings highlight the significant impact of masking on autistic women’s mental health and sense of self, as well as the transformative power of diagnosis in facilitating self-acceptance and authenticity.
The research also challenges the dominant, masculinized construction of ASC and emphasizes the need for a reconceptualization of the ontological status of ASC to incorporate diverse experiences across the gender spectrum.
This reconceptualization is crucial for improving diagnostic processes, support services, and societal understanding of neurodiversity.
Strengths
The study had several methodological strengths, including:
- The use of a qualitative approach informed by feminist disability theory, which allowed for an in-depth exploration of participants’ lived experiences and the intersection of gender and ASC.
- The reflexive thematic analysis process, which considered power dynamics and the politics of representation, aligned with feminist research practices.
- The inclusion of verbatim quotations from participants, which effectively illustrated the key themes and provided rich, authentic insights into their experiences.
Limitations
The study had some limitations, including:
- The small, self-selecting sample of eight participants, which may not be representative of the broader population of autistic women.
- The lack of representation of self-diagnosed individuals or those with co-morbidities, which could have provided additional insights into the diversity of experiences within the female ASC community.
- The study did not record socioeconomic status, ethnicity, or nationality for the sample, which limits the understanding of how these factors may intersect with gender and ASC.
These limitations suggest that the findings may not be generalizable to all autistic women and highlight the need for further research with larger, more diverse samples.
Implications
The results of this study have significant implications for the understanding and support of autistic women. The findings underscore the need for:
- A reconceptualization of the ontological status of ASC to incorporate diverse experiences across the gender spectrum.
- Improvements in diagnostic tools and clinical practices to better recognize and address the unique presentation and needs of autistic women.
- Increased awareness and acceptance of neurodiversity within society, challenging dominant, masculinized constructions of ASC.
- The development of targeted support services and interventions that consider the intersection of gender and ASC and prioritize the mental health and well-being of autistic women.
Variables that may influence the results include the age at diagnosis, co-occurring mental health conditions, socioeconomic status, and cultural background of the participants.
Further research exploring these variables could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the diverse experiences of autistic women.
Conclusion
This study highlights the importance of understanding the unique experiences of late-diagnosed autistic women and the complex interplay between gender norms, societal expectations, and ASC.
The findings emphasize the need for a reconceptualization of ASC that incorporates diverse experiences across the gender spectrum and informs improvements in diagnostic processes, support services, and societal understanding of neurodiversity.
Further research with larger, more diverse samples is necessary to explore the intersections of gender, ASC, and other variables such as socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and co-occurring conditions.
As the field continues to evolve, it is crucial to acknowledge the sensitivity and complexity of this topic and ensure that the voices and experiences of autistic women are centered in research, clinical practice, and societal discourse.
References
Primary reference
Seers, K., & Hogg, R. (2023). “Fake it ‘till you make it”: Authenticity and wellbeing in late diagnosed autistic women. Feminism & Psychology, 33(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221101455
Other references
Bailey, L. F. (2011). Feminist research. In S. Lapan, M. Quataroli, & F. Riemer (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and design (pp. 391–423). John Wiley & Sons.
Baldwin, S., & Costley, D. (2015). The experiences and needs of female adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 20(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315590805
Bargiela, S., Steward, R., & Mandy, W. (2016). The experiences of late-diagnosed women with autism spectrum conditions: An investigation of the female autism phenotype. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(10), 3281–3294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2872-8
Cridland, E. K., Jones, S. C., Caputi, P., & Magee, C. A. (2014). Being a girl in a boys’ world: Investigating the experiences of girls with autism spectrum disorders during adolescence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(6), 1261–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1985-6
Gould, J., & Ashton-Smith, J. (2011). Missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis? Girls and women on the autism spectrum. Good Autism Practice, 12(1), 34–41.
Zener, D. (2019). Journey to diagnosis for women with autism. Advances in Autism, 5(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/AIA-10-2018-0041
Suggested Socratic Questions
- How do societal expectations and gender norms influence the experiences of autistic women, and what can be done to challenge these norms and create a more inclusive society?
- In what ways can the field of psychology reconceptualize the ontological status of ASC to better incorporate the diverse experiences across the gender spectrum, and how might this impact diagnostic processes and support services?
- Considering the limitations of this study, such as the small, self-selecting sample, what further research is needed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the experiences of autistic women, and how can this research be designed to prioritize their voices and needs?
- How can the insights gained from this study inform the development of targeted support services and interventions for autistic women, and what role can mental health professionals play in advocating for and implementing these changes?
- Given the complex interplay between gender, ASC, and other intersecting factors like socioeconomic status and cultural background, how can researchers, clinicians, and society at large work together to create a more nuanced, intersectional understanding of neurodiversity?