Bobo Doll Experiment
by Saul McLeod published 2011
Bandura (1961) conducted a study to investigate if social behaviors (i.e. aggression) can be acquired by imitation.
Bandura, Ross and Ross tested 36 boys and 36 girls from the Stanford University Nursery School aged between 3 to 6 years old. The role models were one male adult and one female adult.
Under controlled conditions, Bandura arranged for 24 boys and girls to watch a male or female model behaving aggressively towards a toy called a 'Bobo doll'. The adults attacked the Bobo doll in a distinctive manner - they used a hammer in some cases, and in others threw the doll in the air and shouted "Pow, Boom".
Another 24 children were exposed to a non-aggressive model and the final 24 child were used as a control group and not exposed to any model at all.
The researchers pre-tested the children for how aggressive they were by observing the children in the nursery and judged their aggressive behavior on four 5-point rating scales. It was then possible to match the children in each group so that they had similar levels of aggression in their everyday behavior. The experiment is therefore an example of a matched pairs design.
To test the inter-rater reliability of the observers, 51 of the children were rated by two observers independently and their ratings compared. These ratings showed a very high reliability correlation (r = 0.89), which suggested that the observers had good agreement about the behavior of the children.
The children were tested individually through three stages.
Stage 1: Modeling
• Children entered the experimental room individually and the model was invited in.
• The room contained materials to make pictures.
• The model went to a corner containing a tinker toy set, a mallet and 5ft inflatable Bobo doll.
• In the non-aggressive condition the model ignored the Bobo doll.
• In the aggressive condition the model was aggressive towards the Bobo doll using distinctive, easy to imitate (and identify) actions.
• The model put the doll on its side, struck it with the mallet, tossed it in the air, kicked round the room. This sequence was repeated three times.
• The model was also verbally aggressive and used some non-aggressive phrases. An example of verbal aggression was, "Pow!" and "Sock him in the nose".
• After ten minutes the experimenter entered and took the child to a new room which the child was told was another games room.
In stage two (Aggression Arousal) the child was subjected to 'mild aggression arousal'. The child was taken to a room with relatively attractive toys. As soon as the child started to play with the toys the experimenter told the child that these were the experimenter's very best toys and she had decided to reserve them for the other children.
Stage 3: Test for delayed imitation
• The next room contained some aggressive toys and some non-aggressive toys. The non-aggressive toys included a tea set, crayons, three bears and plastic farm animals. The aggressive toys included a mallet and peg board, dart guns, and a 3 foot Bobo doll.
• The child was in the room for 20 minutes and their behavior was observed and rated though a one-way mirror. Observations were made at 5-second intervals therefore giving 240 response units for each child.
• Other behaviors that didn’t imitate that of the model were also recorded e.g. punching the Bobo doll on the nose.
• Children who observed the aggressive models made far more imitative aggressive responses than those who were in the non-aggressive or control groups.
• There was more partial and non-imitative aggression among those children who has observed aggressive behavior, although the difference for non-imitative aggression was small.
• The girls in the aggressive model conditions also showed more physical aggressive responses if the model was male but more verbal aggressive responses if the model was female; (However, the exception to this general pattern was the observation of how often they punched Bobo, and in this case the effects of gender were reversed).
• Boys were more likely to imitate same-sex models than girls. The evidence for girls imitating same-sex models is not strong.
• Boys imitated more physically aggressive acts than girls. There was little difference in the verbal aggression between boys and girls.
The findings support Bandura's Social Learning Theory, a behaviorist theory. That is, children learn social behavior such as aggression through the process of observation learning - through watching the behavior of another person.
Central to Social Learning Theory is the identification of which types of models are more likely to be imitated.
There are three main advantages of the experimental method.
1. Experiments are the only means by which cause and effect can be established. Thus it could be demonstrated that the model did have an effect on the child's subsequent behavior because all variables other than the independent variable are controlled.
2. It allows for precise control of variables. Many variables were controlled, such as the gender of the model, the time the children observed the model, the behavior of the model and so on.
3. Experiments can be replicated. Standardized procedures and instructions were used allowing for replicability. In fact the study has been replicated with slight changes, such as using videos and similar results were found.
Limitations of the procedure include:
Many psychologists are very critical of laboratory studies of imitation - in particular because have low ecologically validity. The situation involves the child and an adult model, which is a very limited social situation and there is no interaction between the child and the model at any point; certainly the child has no chance to influence the model in any way. Also the model and the child are strangers. This, of course, is quite unlike 'normal' modeling which often takes place within the family.
A further criticism of the study is that the demonstrations are measured almost immediately. With such snap shot studies we cannot discover if such a single exposure can have long-term effects.
It is possible to argue that the experiment was unethical. For example, there is the problem of whether or not the children suffered any long-term consequences as a result of the study. Although it is unlikely, we can never be certain.
Bandura, A., Ross, D. & Ross, S.A. (1961).Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-82.
How to cite this article:
McLeod, S. A. (2011). Bobo Doll Experiment. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/bobo-doll.html
Like The Site? Follow Us!