Imagine a blueprint that dictates the shape of your adult world.
For many, that blueprint is drawn during childhood by their primary caregivers.
The way parents interact with their children, the subtle acts of criticism, control, or neglect, can lay the groundwork for how they form relationships and view themselves years later.
But can these early experiences quietly shape the risk of developing a severe mental health condition like psychosis in adulthood?
That’s the process a new study, utilizing a serial mediation analysis, sought to investigate.
It moved beyond just looking at severe childhood trauma to examine the more nuanced impact of different parenting styles.
The researchers aimed to map a sequential pathway: parenting style → attachment style → core schemas → adult psychosis symptoms.
Key Points
- Childhood parenting styles significantly influence the development of adult psychosis symptoms.
- This connection is a ‘chain reaction,’ first creating insecure attachment styles, which then lead to deeply held negative schemas (core beliefs) about the self and others.
- Abusive or overcontrolling parenting is linked to anxious or disorganized attachment, while indifferent (neglectful) parenting is linked to avoidant attachment.
- The findings emphasize the importance of therapy focusing on attachment and deeply held negative beliefs for people experiencing psychosis.
Mapping the Domino Effect to Psychosis
The researchers surveyed 132 adults who had experienced psychosis.
Participants provided information on their caregivers’ parenting styles, their own adult attachment style, core beliefs (schemas), and the frequency of their psychosis symptoms.
The goal was to see if attachment and schemas acted as ‘serial mediators’.
Think of this as a chain of dominoes: the parent’s style (first domino) doesn’t knock over the symptoms (last domino) directly.
Instead, it tips over attachment (the second domino), which then tips over schemas (the third domino), which finally triggers the symptoms.
The Different Pathways from Parental Style
The study identified two distinct pathways, showing that the type of poor parenting determined the resulting attachment style, and ultimately, the path to psychosis symptoms.
A Path Forged by Abuse and Control
When participants reported abusive or overcontrolling parenting – behaviors like verbal or physical abuse, overprotection, or excessive criticism – a specific domino effect was observed.
- This parenting style strongly predicted anxious or disorganized attachment styles. Anxious attachment involves a fear of abandonment, while disorganized attachment is a response to the caregiver being both a source of safety and fear.
- The anxious or disorganized attachment then led to the development of negative schemas (negative beliefs about the self and others).
- Finally, this combination fully mediated the link to a higher frequency of positive and negative psychosis symptoms in adulthood.
The direct link between abusive/overcontrolling parenting and psychosis symptoms was non-significant on its own.
This emphasizes that the damage comes not just from the act, but from the internal psychological mechanisms – the attachment style and schemas – that the act creates.
The Path of Indifference and Neglect
A separate pathway emerged for those who experienced indifferent parenting, which taps into childhood neglect, such as parents “forgetting about me” or “leaving me on my own a lot”.
- This indifference significantly predicted the development of an avoidant attachment style. This style is characterized by emotional avoidance and difficulty with closeness.
- This avoidant attachment then paved the way for negative schemas.
- In turn, this chain fully mediated the relationship, leading to a higher frequency of positive and negative psychosis symptoms.
The results were consistent whether the parenting style came from the mother or the father.
Why It Matters: Re-Writing the Blueprint in Therapy
These findings bridge the gap between early life experiences and severe mental health challenges.
They reveal a psychological mechanism where early caregiving subtly shapes adult vulnerability.
The study highlights that the path to psychosis is not singular; different types of poor parenting create distinct vulnerabilities.
For Clinicians:
The study argues for explicitly incorporating attachment theory and schema-focused work into psychological therapies for psychosis, such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis (CBT-p).
A person with psychosis may benefit from identifying their maladaptive schemas (negative core beliefs) to develop strategies for strengthening more adaptive ones.
Attachment-focused techniques, like secure attachment imagery, which have shown promise in reducing paranoia, could directly target the vulnerable attachment style.
For Parents and Families:
This research highlights the deep, long-lasting impact of even subtle, non-traumatic parenting styles, like indifference or overcontrol.
It supports the call for early intervention and funding for parenting programs—like Circle of Security or Triple P—to help parents foster secure attachment styles in their children, potentially reducing the risk of later mental health issues.
The consistent results for both maternal and paternal parenting also underscore the need for services to support fathers and all caregivers.
In summary, the relationship between early care and adult psychosis is a sequential story.
Understanding this process allows psychologists to shift their focus from solely addressing symptoms to helping individuals re-write the flawed psychological blueprints drawn up in childhood.
Reference
Akers, N., Taylor, C. D., & Berry, K. (2025). Understanding the relationships between parenting, attachment, schemas and psychosis: A serial mediation analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12545
