Why Your Personal Coping Skills Shape How You Help Others

Illustration of a man and woman hugging and comforting their friend between them.

THE KEY DISCOVERIES

  • The Shared Strategy Secret: Researchers found that individuals use nearly identical methods to regulate their own emotions and the emotions of those around them.
  • Global Validation: This “Mirror Mechanism” was confirmed across 19 different countries and nearly 4,000 participants, proving it is a universal human trait.+1
  • The Relationship Multiplier: The stronger your bond with someone, the more likely you are to “project” your own coping mechanisms onto them.+2
  • High-Stakes Repercussion: During wartime and global pandemics, this tendency remains constant, suggesting it is a hard-wired survival response.+3
  • Mental Health Impact: The study suggests that individual struggles with anxiety or depression may unintentionally dictate how we support our partners and children.+1

Our private emotional habits often become the blueprint for how we comfort the world around us.

Managing your internal world can often feel like a private, lonely battle.

You might struggle with a specific anxiety management tool or find yourself stuck in a loop of overthinking, wondering why it is so hard to just “feel better.”

This frustration is often doubled when you try to support a loved one who is hurting. You want to help, but you might feel like you are guessing or, worse, offering advice that falls flat.

According to lead researcher Shir Ginosar Yaari and senior author Maya Tamir from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, there is a profound reason for this struggle.

In a landmark study published in the prestigious journal Emotion, the team uncovered a “mirroring” effect in human psychology.

Their research simplifies our understanding of the brain by revealing that we do not have two separate systems for helping ourselves and helping others.

Instead, we use a single “master key” of coping strategies that we apply to both worlds.

The Universal “Master Key” of Emotion

For decades, psychologists treated “self-help” and “helping others” as two different skills.

We thought that the way we name disorders or categorize support was distinct from our own internal healing.

However, the team led by Shir Ginosar Yaari found that we rely on a process called simulation.

When you see a friend in pain, your brain essentially “simulates” being in their position.

You ask yourself what you would do to feel better and then suggest or apply that exact strategy to them.

The study followed thousands of people through the stressors of COVID-19 and the Israel-Hamas war to see if this held true under pressure. I

n almost every case, if a person used distraction or cognitive reappraisal (the way we change our interpretation of a situation) for themselves, they used it for others too.

Why Your Closest Bonds Change Your Brain

The research highlights a fascinating biological and psychological “anchor” in our relationships.

Maya Tamir and her colleagues discovered that this mirroring effect is not a flat constant. It actually intensifies based on relationship quality.

The team found that in high-quality relationships, people are significantly more likely to use their own “trait-level” strategies on their partners.

According to the study, when you feel close to someone, you assume they are more similar to you than they actually might be.

This is a “shared signal” in the brain.

You stop seeing them as a separate entity with unique needs and start seeing them as an extension of your own emotional landscape.

While this can create deep empathy, it also means your own emotional habits—good or bad—become the default blueprint for your relationship.

Translating the Science of “Other-Oriented” Support

To understand these findings, we must translate the academic jargon into people-first language.

The researchers looked at “extrinsic interpersonal emotion regulation,” which is simply the way we try to make others feel better.

They compared this to “intrapersonal regulation,” or how we handle our own stress.

The results showed that for “adaptive” strategies, like finding the silver lining or shifting focus, the mirror was very clear.

However, for “maladaptive” strategies, like expressive suppression (hiding your feelings) or rumination (obsessively thinking about a problem), the link was sometimes weaker.

Shir Ginosar Yaari suggests this is because most people know these habits are less effective.

Even if you personally struggle with overthinking, you might hesitate to encourage a friend to do the same because you know the toll it takes.

The “Social Engine”: How Culture and Gender Play a Role

One of the most shocking statistics from the study is the consistency across 19 countries.

Whether in a “collectivist” society that prioritizes the group or an “individualist” one that prioritizes the self, the Mirror Mechanism remained the same.

The team also controlled for gender and found that while men and women might choose different strategies, they both mirror those choices when helping others.

This research suggests that our “environment engine” is powered by the self.

We are the starting point for every social interaction.

According to the team, this means that the vast amount of research we already have on self-care can now be used to understand how we support our communities.

If we know how an individual manages their own anxiety, we can predict with high accuracy how they will act as a parent, a partner, or a friend in times of crisis.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOU

The most empowering takeaway from this study is the “Universal Factor.”

Your ability to be a “good” partner or friend is directly tied to the tools you use for your own mental health.

If you want to change your relationships, you must first change your internal “Mirror.”

1. Identify Your Leverage Point

The Insight: The “root” discovered is the process of simulation. You are not reacting to your partner; you are reacting to what you would feel in their shoes.

The Action: Next time a friend is stressed, pause before giving advice. Ask yourself, “Am I suggesting what they need, or just what I usually do?”

This simple moment of differentiation can break a cycle of ineffective support.

The Shift: Move from “How do I fix them?” to “How do I manage myself so I can see them clearly?”

2. Optimize Your Emotional Engine

The Insight: The study found that 31% to 42% of the way we help others is a direct reflection of our own trait-level habits.

The Action: Create a “Support Protocol.” List the three things you do when you are sad. If those things are healthy (like going for a walk), keep mirroring them.

If they are unhealthy (like withdrawing), consciously choose a different “Social Intervention” when helping others.+1

3. The “Relationship Quality” Tweak

The Insight: High-quality bonds actually make you more likely to project your own habits onto others.

The Action: In your closest relationships, use the “Similarity Check-In.” Say to your partner: “I usually like to be left alone when I’m angry, but do you actually need a hug instead?”

This acknowledges the Mirror Mechanism while respecting their unique needs.

Ginosar Yaari, S., Pauw, L., Milek, A., Greenwald, Y., Katsoty, D., Greenaway, K. H., & Tamir, M. (2026). Do unto others: People use similar strategies to regulate their own emotions and the emotions of others.Emotion, 26(2), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001587

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology, where she contributes accessible content on psychological topics. She is also an autistic PhD student at the University of Birmingham, researching autistic camouflaging in higher education.


Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.