Justice Sensitivity in Autism

Autism justice sensitivity refers to a heightened sense of fairness, equity, and inclusion, coupled with a strong need to address and correct injustices. In essence, it means being extremely attuned to when something is not fair or right.

Many autistic (and other neurodivergent) people describe a heightened sense of fairness. It varies from person to person. No study has yet measured justice sensitivity in autistic people with a validated scale. The evidence so far is indirect.

Justice Sensitivity Reflection Sheet

Importantly, autism justice sensitivity is not only about distress. It also supports social justice and inclusion.

Autistic advocates point out that being keenly aware of unfairness often drives them to take action against it. The neurodiversity movement itself (which fights for autistic rights and acceptance) is rooted in Autistic people’s awareness of injustice and refusal to tolerate it.

Where does justice sensitivity come from?

In research, justice sensitivity means how often a person notices injustice and how strongly they react in feeling, thought and behavior (Bondü & Esser, 2015). It is a personality dimension. It is not a diagnosis, and it is not specific to autism.

Scientists measure it from four perspectives (Groskurth et al., 2023):

• Victim: Your reaction when you are treated unfairly.
• Observer: Your reaction when you witness others being treated unfairly.
• Beneficiary: Your reaction when you benefit from an injustice done to others.
• Perpetrator: Your reaction when you commit an injustice.

Victim sensitivity is the perspective most linked to distress in general-population studies (Bondü et al., 2017). Twin research shows that justice sensitivity is partly heritable (Eftedal et al., 2022).

For autistic people, several further explanations have been proposed. Each is a proposal, not a proven cause.

Living With Injustice

Autistic people often experience injustice firsthand. They may face social exclusion, bullying or a lack of accommodations. This plausibly heightens their awareness of unfairness.

It is the best-supported explanation, though no study has yet linked the two. A meta-analysis of 34 studies found a pooled victimization prevalence of 44% in autistic people (Trundle et al., 2023).

Stigma takes a toll too. In 111 autistic people, discrimination, internalized stigma and concealment predicted poorer mental health, even after controlling for general stress (Botha & Frost, 2020).

Being told you are overreacting adds another layer. If a listener discounts an autistic person’s judgment because of prejudice, philosophers call it testimonial injustice (Chapman & Carel, 2022). No study has measured how often this happens in response to fairness complaints.

Empathy and Hyper-Empathy

Contrary to outdated stereotypes, many autistic people describe feeling other people’s pain very strongly. This is sometimes called hyper-empathy. They say it makes unfairness to others hard to bear.

Group-level research gives a more mixed picture. Autistic adults did not differ from non-autistic adults on emotional empathy in two studies (Dziobek et al., 2008; Greenberg et al., 2024).

They did score lower on cognitive empathy. That means working out what someone else thinks or feels. A meta-analysis of 51 studies (2,095 autistic participants, 2,869 controls) also found lower empathic concern (Song et al., 2019).

Alexithymia, difficulty identifying and describing your own feelings, complicates the picture (Patil et al., 2016).

So hyper-empathy is better read as a description of some autistic people’s experience than as an established cause of justice sensitivity. That is not the group average on standard measures.

The double empathy problem adds that misreadings between autistic and non-autistic people run both ways (Milton, 2012).

A Firm Moral Code

Many autistic people have a characteristically black-and-white sense of right and wrong. This can lead to a firm personal moral code. They may find it hard to “just go along” with something that violates their values.

Researchers use different terms: reduced sensitivity to context and rigid adherence to rules. These describe a decision style, not a fault. Three kinds of study fit this picture:

• Consistent Choices: Autistic adults made more consistent shopping choices when a decoy option was added (Farmer et al., 2017).
• Refusing Gains: Autistic adolescents and young adults were far more likely to refuse money that funded a morally bad cause (Hu et al., 2021).
• Fairness Ratings: Autistic females rated fairness as more relevant to right and wrong than non-autistic females did (Greenberg et al., 2024).

These studies are small. Only 18 autistic participants were analyzed in the refusal study, and the fairness difference was small and absent in males. None of this shows that autistic people react more strongly to unfair treatment.

Many autistic people say that any perceived injustice, even a minor one, can trigger strong emotions such as anger, anxiety or sadness.

Justice-Sensitive Dysphoria and Burnout

When an autistic person is repeatedly confronted with unfairness they feel powerless to change, they may experience what some in the community call “justice-sensitive dysphoria.” It describes the hopelessness and anger of living in an unjust world while being highly sensitive to that injustice.

The phrase is an informal community label, not a diagnosis. No peer-reviewed paper using it was found, and it has no agreed definition or measure.

It should not be confused with rejection sensitivity, which has been studied.

The cost of constant outrage can add up. Autistic adults describe burnout as chronic exhaustion that arises when life stressors build into a cumulative load and barriers prevent relief (Raymaker et al., 2020).

No study has yet linked justice-related exposure to autistic burnout. The pathway is plausible, but untested.

Examples of Justice Sensitivity in Everyday Situations

Autism justice sensitivity manifests in various settings where fairness is at stake:

• Education: Distress when rules are applied inconsistently and, for some students, standing up for peers.
• Workplace: Difficulty with inequitable policies and a pull to challenge unfair practices.
• Societal Injustice: Strong reactions to news of discrimination, corruption or environmental harm.
• Daily Social Interactions: Insistence on strict rules in queues, games and sport.

Education

Autistic students may become extremely upset when rules are applied inconsistently or when witnessing unfair treatment.

For example, they might be distressed if classmates cut in line or if teachers enforce rules selectively.

Some autistic young people also stand up for bullied classmates. In a Dutch study of 260 autistic and 743 typically developing adolescents, autistic boys were more often defenders and outsiders than typically developing boys (Schrooten et al., 2018). Autistic girls were more often victims.

The two groups attended different kinds of school, so the comparison is imperfect.

Even so, defending peers is real for some autistic students. It sits alongside high rates of victimization: a meta-analysis found a pooled prevalence of 44% (Trundle et al., 2023).

Research on distress at unfair rules in school is limited. In one small study, autistic children showed a non-significant trend towards recommending punishment for harmless breaches of social norms (Dempsey et al., 2022).

Workplace

Autistic adults with high justice sensitivity may struggle with inequitable policies or behaviors. They might feel compelled to challenge unfair practices even when doing so could trigger anxiety or confrontation.

Many are troubled by workplace discrimination and may become advocates for equal treatment, even if it puts them at odds with supervisors.

That courage can improve workplace practices. It may also lead to isolation.

No study has yet measured how autistic employees react to unfair workplace procedures. Research on fairness at work suggests three things should help: consistent procedures, a chance to voice concerns, and respectful explanations. This is an inference, not a tested finding.

Societal Injustice

Autistic individuals with heightened justice sensitivity often develop strong concerns about broader social inequities and systemic issues.

Unlike some neurotypical people who can compartmentalize or distance themselves from troubling information, autistic individuals might experience intense emotional reactions to news about discrimination, political corruption, or environmental destruction.

This can lead to dedicated activism or advocacy work. Their detailed knowledge and unwavering commitment to principles becomes a strength.

However, it can also result in emotional overwhelm or burnout when they cannot easily “switch off” their awareness of injustice in the world.

Activism itself can burn people out. Interviews with 22 social-justice and human-rights activists identified a “culture of martyrdom” that hastened burnout (Chen & Gorski, 2015). Those activists were not an autistic sample, but the warning applies.

Many autistic advocates report feeling a moral responsibility to address unfairness wherever they encounter it, viewing silence or inaction as a form of complicity.

Daily Social Interactions

Even in everyday situations, fairness issues can significantly affect autistic individuals:

• Queues: Someone waiting in line might react intensely if another person cuts ahead, seeing it as a serious violation of social rules.
• Games and Sport: They typically insist on strict rule adherence and may become extremely frustrated when others bend the rules.

This commitment to fairness can sometimes create social friction. Many autistic people also describe themselves as honest, loyal and reliable in relationships, striving to “do the right thing” by others.

Evidence Check: Is Justice Sensitivity Higher in Autism?

Verdict: Mixed or contested.

The popular claim that autistic people have heightened justice sensitivity has not been tested with a validated measure. The indirect evidence supports a narrower claim: autistic adults are more generous to socially distant others. The studies are small, and one conflicts.

The verdict rests on five bodies of evidence:

• Adult Generosity: Three incentivized experiments found equal generosity to close others and more to socially distant others (Tei et al., 2019; Forbes et al., 2024; Forbes et al., 2026).
• A Contrary Study: Autistic adolescents and young adults were less generous to close others (Warnell et al., 2019).
• Children’s Fairness Games: Autistic children accepted 40% of unfair offers, against 11% of typically developing children (Hartley & Fisher, 2018).
• An ADHD Comparison: A survey of 1,235 young people found elevated justice sensitivity in ADHD (Bondü & Esser, 2015).
• Anger Management: A meta-analysis of 154 studies found that calming activities reduced anger and vigorous ones did not (Kjærvik & Bushman, 2024).

The newest of those studies, from the UK, compared 37 autistic and 38 non-autistic adults. The group-by-distance interaction was significant (p = .032).

Repetitive responding did not explain it. Even so, the sample is modest.

The German and UK studies share authors. The Warnell study used a different task and younger participants.

Generosity is not the same as reacting more strongly to injustice. The authors suggest more consistent fairness norms may explain it. That has not been tested.

The nearest behavioral test of reacting to unfairness is the Ultimatum Game.

Rejecting an unfair offer costs the responder. The game has only been run with autistic children and adolescents.

In a second study, autistic children accepted more unfair offers, but the adolescent difference was not significant (Jin et al., 2020).

Accepting an offer can reflect payoff maximization. It need not mean low fairness concern. The ADHD survey shows that the method could be used with autistic people.

The anger evidence is the strongest. The meta-analysis pooled 184 samples and 10,189 participants.

Calming activities such as breathing and mindfulness reduced anger and aggression (g = -0.63). Hitting a bag or jogging did not (g = -0.02).

A separate experiment found that analytical rumination maintained anger, while reappraisal and distraction reduced it (Denson et al., 2012).

Neither source reported autistic participants separately. Applying them to autistic adults is an inference.

Heightened justice sensitivity in autistic people is a widely reported lived experience that has not been measured with a validated scale. The limited behavioral evidence in children does not show that autistic children punish unfairness more readily than other children.

Coping with Justice Sensitivity

Living with such a strong sensitivity to injustice can be challenging. Psychologists, autism advocates and researchers offer several strategies to help manage the emotional toll while still honoring one’s values.

Most of this advice comes from autistic advocates and clinicians, and none of it has been tested in a controlled trial for justice-related distress. Key pieces of expert advice include:

• Pick Your Battles: Focus your energy where you can have the most impact, and give yourself permission to step back from the rest.
• Set Boundaries: Limit triggering content, schedule offline time and step back from draining arguments.
• Be Open: Explain your reasons to the people who matter, so that stepping back reads as self-protection, not indifference.
• Focus Locally: Break big ideals into smaller steps in your own corner of the world.
• Self-Care: Rest, recharge and watch for signs of burnout.
• Regulate: Use mindfulness, grounding, journaling or a calming pause to create a buffer before reacting.
• Reframe: See your sense of justice as a strength, and channel it into purposeful action.
• Find Allies: Work with others who share your passion for fairness, in person or online.

Pick your battles

Recognize that you will not be able to fix every injustice you encounter, and that’s okay. In other words, you’re still a good person even if you walk away from some fights.

Stepping back doesn’t mean you condone the injustice. It simply means you’re human and have limits.

Both mental health experts and autistic advocates suggest consciously prioritizing which issues to address and which to let go.

Focus your energy where it counts. Choose the causes where you can have the most impact, or those most important to you, and give yourself permission to step back from the rest.

Olivia Guy-Evans describes this in a first-person account. She is an autistic PhD student and associate editor at Simply Psychology.

As she explains, her knee-jerk reaction to a statement she knew was factually wrong, or an opinion that felt unfair or harmful, was an overwhelming urge to intervene.

She came to see that urge as rooted in a strong moral drive. It was not ego. Learning to pick her battles, she writes, “hasn’t meant silencing my values”, though it has let her reserve her energy for the conversations that truly matter.

Set boundaries and take breaks

People with high justice sensitivity can become immersed in tracking all the world’s problems. For example, they may keep doomscrolling, which means repeatedly reading distressing news online and struggling to stop. Others over-commit to advocacy work.

Moral and emotional language spreads faster online. A meta-analysis of 27 studies estimated 13% more spread per additional moral-emotional word (Brady et al., 2025).

A meta-analysis of 44 reports linked doomscrolling to poorer mental health (Li & Yin, 2026). The evidence is very low in certainty and cannot show cause.

It’s crucial to set limits. This might mean:

• Filter Your Feed: Use filters and turn off news alerts.
• Schedule Offline Time: Set aside regular time away from triggering content.
• Skip Draining Arguments: Decide not to engage in arguments that are draining.

Therapist Claire Eggleston notes that because there will always be more injustices, those who care deeply must learn to enforce boundaries and take breaks, or else risk constant exhaustion.

Be open about your boundaries and needs

Several autistic adults stress the value of communicating your limits to others.

Suppose you decide not to take on a particular fight. For example, you might skip complaining about an unfair policy because it would put you in a toxic situation. It can help to explain your reasons to those who matter.

By saying something like, “This situation is harmful to me, so I can’t get involved,” a clear boundary can be set.

The idea is simple. When you step back, make it known that it is for valid reasons, such as protecting your mental health or stability, not because you don’t care.

This honesty can educate others about your autism-related needs. It can also reduce pressure and guilt. It turns your sensitivity from something you must hide into something the people around you can support.

You have every right to prioritize your well-being. Articulating that need is part of self-advocacy.

Focus on What You Can Change

Another piece of advice from autistic adults is learning to make peace with the fact that you cannot fix all the world’s problems overnight.

What may help is redirecting energy. Aim for concrete, achievable actions in your own sphere.

For instance, they might work on improving their local community or helping one person at a time, rather than ruminating constantly about global issues beyond their control.

This doesn’t mean giving up on big ideals – it means breaking them down into smaller steps.

Try making your “corner of the world” a bit better. That could be small-scale advocacy, kindness in daily interactions, or supporting a specific cause. You can then see real progress and not feel paralyzed by the scope of injustice everywhere.

This pragmatic approach can reduce feelings of helplessness. It’s a way of telling yourself: “I acknowledge injustice exists, but I will do what I can today, here and now.”

Practice Self-Care and Watch for Burnout

Maintaining your own well-being is not selfish. It is necessary. Psychologists advise that individuals with strong justice sensitivity should make a deliberate effort to care for themselves with the same compassion they extend to others.

This includes basic self-care (adequate rest, nutrition, downtime) as well as emotional self-care.

Pay attention to signs of burnout or extreme stress, such as:

• Fatigue
• Cynicism
• Feeling “on edge” all the time

When you notice these red flags, it’s a signal to step back and recharge before you hit a crisis point.

You might also remind yourself that you deserve support too. If you’re always sticking up for others who are wronged, make sure you have someone to talk to or a way to decompress when you feel overwhelmed.

Think of it as putting on your own oxygen mask first so that you can continue your work for justice effectively.

Use Healthy Coping and Regulation Techniques

Because injustice can trigger intense emotions, learning ways to self-regulate those feelings is helpful.

Experts often recommend techniques like mindfulness, grounding exercises, or journaling to process the anger and frustration that come with perceived injustices.

One practice comes from Radically Open DBT. It is a treatment designed for overcontrol. It involves brief journaling “self-inquiry” exercises to cultivate healthy self-doubt. You remind yourself that you might not have all the facts, or that the situation may have more nuance.

The exercise has not been tested on its own. The therapy it comes from has only emerging evidence.

An uncontrolled service evaluation that included 23 autistic adults found distress fell (Cornwall et al., 2021). The one randomized trial, in non-autistic adults, found no significant benefit at the 12-month primary end-point (Lynch et al., 2020).

Self-doubt can also sit awkwardly with being disbelieved. For a person whose accurate perceptions are routinely dismissed, being asked to doubt them may not help (Chapman & Carel, 2022).

In a similar vein, taking a moment to breathe deeply and consider whether an issue truly requires immediate action can prevent knee-jerk reactions.

The goal isn’t to become indifferent, but to give yourself a buffer before reacting.

This can help in emotionally charged moments.

For example, imagine you see something unfair and feel a surge of rage. A calming strategy (deep breaths, a quick walk, counting to ten) can help you approach the issue more constructively. It can stop you acting in a way that escalates conflict.

Calming activities are the ones with research support. A meta-analysis of 154 studies found that breathing and mindfulness reduced anger, while hitting a bag or jogging did not (Kjærvik & Bushman, 2024).

Many autistic individuals also find comfort in talking things through with a trusted friend or therapist, who can provide perspective and reassurance when the world feels cruel.

Reframe Justice Sensitivity as a Strength

Instead of seeing your strong sense of justice only as a burden, try to also view it as one of your strengths.

After all, caring about fairness is a positive trait – it’s what drives progress and empathy in society.

Autistic advocates likewise note that their intolerance for injustice means they often act when others stay silent. Reminding yourself of this upside can be empowering.

For instance, you can think about times when your speaking up helped someone or led to a solution. That happened because of your principles.

Channel your passion into constructive outlets, such as:

• Volunteering for a cause
• Educating others
• Joining advocacy or civil rights groups

These can move things toward change. They can also give you a sense of purpose.

Autistic adults describe this drive in research too. In a co-produced interview study of 20 Australian autistic adults, participants spoke of a “passion for social justice”. It was often rooted in their own experience of injustice or bullying (Browne et al., 2026).

As Quinn, one participant, put it, “as Autistics we have to stand up, because otherwise we become victims.”

They also described a cost. Witnessing injustice without acting was linked to poorer peace of mind.

David Gray-Hammond, an autism activist, argues that justice sensitivity can be “sharpened and wielded” as a tool. It can be painful at times. Yet it shows us what is unfair and spurs us to act, so this trait can be a powerful force for good in the world.

Keeping this perspective in mind may make the emotional load easier to carry. Your feelings are aligned with deeply held values, and they can lead to positive outcomes when managed well.

Find Allies and Community Support

Finally, don’t carry the burden of justice alone. Autistic advocates mention that it’s often more effective (and less emotionally draining) to address injustices with the help of allies.

A workplace example shows why. A lone autistic employee going up against an unfair policy can feel isolated. It helps to rally colleagues who agree and can support the cause.

Not only does this distribute the work, but it also lessens the chance of the autistic person being isolated or ignored.

Like-minded company helps. Being around others who share your passion for fairness can validate your feelings and provide comfort. Those others might be fellow autistic activists. Or they might be friends who “get it.”

Online communities (like the #ActuallyAutistic community on social media or autism support forums) can be great places to vent, brainstorm solutions, and feel understood.

Knowing that “other people experience the same thing” can itself be a relief. More voices speaking together carry greater weight. That matters when you are advocating for change.

Teamwork and solidarity can turn what feels like a lonely battle into a shared mission, reminding you that you’re part of a larger community striving for a fairer world.

How Strong Is the Evidence for Each Strategy?

No controlled trial has tested any of these strategies for justice-related distress in autistic people. Three approaches have been studied with autistic participants. The outcomes were not justice-related.

In interviews and focus groups, 32 autistic adults described stimming as a way to soothe or communicate intense emotions (Kapp et al., 2019).

Acceptance, social support and doing things in an autistic way were linked to recovery from burnout (Raymaker et al., 2020).

Focused interests can be restorative, although a very high intensity of engagement was linked to lower wellbeing (Grove et al., 2018). The table sets out the nearest evidence for each strategy.

Strategy	Nearest evidence	Main caution
Stimming and body-based regulation	Interviews and focus groups with 32 autistic adults (Kapp et al., 2019)	Describes experience; does not show it reduces justice-related distress
Community and validation	Burnout interviews and online posts (Raymaker et al., 2020; Mantzalas et al., 2022)	Qualitative, and about burnout in general
Focused interests as restoration	Survey of autistic adults (Grove et al., 2018)	An association only; very high intensity was linked to lower wellbeing
Calming activities before replying	Meta-analysis of 154 studies on anger (Kjærvik & Bushman, 2024)	The outcome is anger, not justice-related distress
Running or hitting to “discharge” anger	The same meta-analysis found no average benefit	The evidence points against it
Drafting a reply; talking it through	Anger-writing experiment (Denson et al., 2012)	Helps if it reframes or distracts; rehearsing the grievance maintains anger
Prioritizing, boundaries, limiting news, local action, allies, reframing	None found testing the strategy itself	Reasonable and low-risk, but untested

Most of the advice above sits in the last row. That does not make it wrong. It means these strategies are reasonable, low-risk starting points to adapt to the person, not tested treatments.

References

Bondü, R., & Esser, G. (2015). Justice and rejection sensitivity in children and adolescents with ADHD symptoms. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-014-0560-9

Bondü, R., Sahyazici-Knaak, F., & Esser, G. (2017). Long-term associations of justice sensitivity, rejection sensitivity, and depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1446. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01446

Botha, M., & Frost, D. M. (2020). Extending the minority stress model to understand mental health problems experienced by the autistic population. Society and Mental Health, 10(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869318804297

Brady, W. J., Rathje, S., Globig, L. K., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2025). Estimating the effect size of moral contagion in online networks: A pre-registered replication and meta-analysis. PNAS Nexus, 4(11), Article pgaf327. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf327

Browne, K., Lawson, W., McGarry, S., Scott, M., Girdler, S., & Milbourn, B. (2026). “Consistent support is good for my mental health”—Exploring the lived experience of autistic mental health. Autism in Adulthood, 8(3), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2024.0141

Chapman, R., & Carel, H. (2022). Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life. Journal of Social Philosophy, 53(4), 614–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12456

Chen, C. W., & Gorski, P. C. (2015). Burnout in social justice and human rights activists: Symptoms, causes and implications. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 7(3), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huv011

Cornwall, P. L., Simpson, S., Gibbs, C., & Morfee, V. (2021). Evaluation of radically open dialectical behaviour therapy in an adult community mental health team: Effectiveness in people with autism spectrum disorders. BJPsych Bulletin, 45(3), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2020.113

Dempsey, E. E., Moore, C., Johnson, S. A., Stewart, S. H., & Smith, I. M. (2022). Moral foundations theory among autistic and neurotypical children. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 782610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.782610

Denson, T. F., Moulds, M. L., & Grisham, J. R. (2012). The effects of analytical rumination, reappraisal, and distraction on anger experience. Behavior Therapy, 43(2), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.08.001

Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Bahnemann, M., Heekeren, H. R., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. (2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x

Eftedal, N. H., Kleppestø, T. H., Czajkowski, N. O., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Røysamb, E., Vassend, O., Ystrom, E., & Thomsen, L. (2022). Justice sensitivity is undergirded by separate heritable motivations to be morally principled and opportunistic. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 5402. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09253-2

Farmer, G. D., Baron-Cohen, S., & Skylark, W. J. (2017). People with autism spectrum conditions make more consistent decisions. Psychological Science, 28(8), 1067–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617694867

Forbes, P. A. G., Chaliani, I., Schilbach, L., & Kalenscher, T. (2024). Autistic adults show enhanced generosity to socially distant others. Autism, 28(4), 999–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613231190674

Forbes, P. A. G., Hughes, G., Schilbach, L., White, S., & Kalenscher, T. (2026). Increased prosocial value orientation in autistic adults. Autism, 30(2), 538–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613251385029

Greenberg, Y. D. M., Holt, R., Allison, C., Smith, P., Newman, R., Boardman-Pretty, T., Haidt, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2024). Moral foundations in autistic people and people with systemizing minds. Molecular Autism, 15, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-024-00591-8

Groskurth, K., Beierlein, C., Nießen, D., Baumert, A., Rammstedt, B., & Lechner, C. M. (2023). An English-language adaptation and validation of the Justice Sensitivity Short Scales-8 (JSS-8). PLOS ONE, 18(11), Article e0293748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293748

Grove, R., Hoekstra, R. A., Wierda, M., & Begeer, S. (2018). Special interests and subjective wellbeing in autistic adults. Autism Research, 11(5), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1931

Hartley, C., & Fisher, S. (2018). Do children with autism spectrum disorder share fairly and reciprocally? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(8), 2714–2726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3528-7

Hu, Y., Pereira, A. M., Gao, X., Campos, B. M., Derrington, E., Corgnet, B., Zhou, X., Cendes, F., & Dreher, J.-C. (2021). Right temporoparietal junction underlies avoidance of moral transgression in autism spectrum disorder. The Journal of Neuroscience, 41(8), 1699–1715. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1237-20.2020

Jin, P., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Xiao, Y., Li, C., Qiu, N., Weng, J., Fang, H., & Ke, X. (2020). The fair decision-making of children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder from the perspective of dual-process theories. BMC Psychiatry, 20, Article 152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02562-8

Kapp, S. K., Steward, R., Crane, L., Elliott, D., Elphick, C., Pellicano, E., & Russell, G. (2019). “People should be allowed to do what they like”: Autistic adults’ views and experiences of stimming. Autism, 23(7), 1782–1792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319829628

Kjærvik, S. L., & Bushman, B. J. (2024). A meta-analytic review of anger management activities that increase or decrease arousal: What fuels or douses rage? Clinical Psychology Review, 109, Article 102414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102414

Li, Q., & Yin, X. (2026). Doomscrolling, mental health, and psychological well-being in adolescents and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1893800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1893800

Lynch, T. R., Hempel, R. J., Whalley, B., Byford, S., Chamba, R., Clarke, P., Clarke, S., Kingdon, D. G., O’Mahen, H., Remington, B., Rushbrook, S. C., Shearer, J., Stanton, M., Swales, M., Watkins, A., & Russell, I. T. (2020). Refractory depression: Mechanisms and efficacy of radically open dialectical behaviour therapy (RefraMED): Findings of a randomised trial on benefits and harms. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 216(4), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.53

Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What is autistic burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0021

Milton, D. E. M. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy problem’. Disability & Society, 27(6), 883–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.710008

Patil, I., Melsbach, J., Hennig-Fast, K., & Silani, G. (2016). Divergent roles of autistic and alexithymic traits in utilitarian moral judgments in adults with autism. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 23637. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23637

Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., Kapp, S. K., Hunter, M., Joyce, A., & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079

Schrooten, I., Scholte, R. H. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Hymel, S. (2018). Participant roles in bullying among Dutch adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 47(6), 874–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1138411

Song, Y., Nie, T., Shi, W., Zhao, X., & Yang, Y. (2019). Empathy impairment in individuals with autism spectrum conditions from a multidimensional perspective: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01902

Tei, S., Fujino, J., Itahashi, T., Aoki, Y., Ohta, H., Kubota, M., Hashimoto, R., Nakamura, M., Kato, N., & Takahashi, H. (2019). Egocentric biases and atypical generosity in autistic individuals. Autism Research, 12(11), 1598–1608. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2130

Trundle, G., Jones, K. A., Ropar, D., & Egan, V. (2023). Prevalence of victimisation in autistic individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(4), 2282–2296. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221093689

Warnell, K. R., Maniscalco, S., Baker, S., Yi, R., & Redcay, E. (2019). Social and delay discounting in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 12(6), 870–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2085