Patriarchal ideology is the idea that men have more power, dominance, and privilege than women. Patriarchy is a social system in which men are thought to hold positions of power in both the public and private spheres. Women, on the other hand, are believed to be in less privileged positions and are oppressed by a patriarchal society.
Patriarchy is a complex system made up of symbols, ideas, values, and behaviors. It touches most aspects of life, from everyday conversation to politics and literature.
Family naming is one example. A wife typically takes her husband’s surname, and their children carry it too.
Who holds power is another. Men are more often the political leaders, lawmakers, directors, CEOs, and managers, while women are more often confined to the household or to lower workplace positions.
With patriarchal ideology, there are typical values associated with it. For instance, a patriarchy may assign more worth to reasoning and rationality than to emotions and prioritize family over all other types of commitment.
Patriarchal values are supported by patriarchal beliefs, such as the belief that (primarily) white, heterosexual men should have dominance and that girls and women should be devalued. These values and beliefs are intended to explicitly steer behavior.
Key Takeaways
- Belief, not arrangement: patriarchal ideology is the belief that men’s greater power is natural or right, not merely the fact that men often hold more of it.
- Three characteristics: the theory is defined by male dominance, male identification, and male-centeredness (Johnson, 1997).
- Naturalisation: its central move is treating a socially produced hierarchy as a fact of biology, which is what makes it hard to see and hard to argue with.
- Transmission: it is passed on through ordinary institutions, including family, school, religion, law, media, and language, usually without anyone intending to teach it.
- Women’s consent: ambivalent sexism theory shows sexism has a punishing face and a rewarding one, and the rewarding one is what tends to secure women’s consent (Glick & Fiske, 1996).
- It can change: a two-year school programme in India shifted teenagers’ gender attitudes measurably, and the change held two years after the programme ended (Dhar et al., 2022).
Characteristics Of Patriarchal Ideology
Patriarchal ideology is conventionally defined by three characteristics: male dominance, male identification, and male-centeredness (Johnson, 1997). Each does different ideological work.
One move runs through all three. Biological differences between the sexes are exaggerated to justify male dominance. Pierre Bourdieu called this symbolic violence: a way of seeing the world so complete that nobody experiences it as imposed (Bourdieu, 2001).
- Male Dominance: men occupy the top of the hierarchy, and this is expected rather than merely observed.
- Male Identification: traits coded “masculine” are valued over traits coded “feminine.”
- Male-Centeredness: social life, history, and culture are organized around men as the default.
Male Dominance
Male dominance puts men at the top of the hierarchy, women at the bottom. It is an expectation, not just an observation.
Men’s position needs no explanation. Women’s does.
That asymmetry is the sign of a successfully naturalised hierarchy.
Where women hold real authority, the ideology rarely collapses. It treats them as exceptions instead, as if they had simply adopted masculine traits.
Rosalind Gill (1993) studied British radio broadcasters. Asked why so few women were on air, they gave reasonable-sounding, non-sexist explanations about women’s voices being unsuitable.
The blame landed on a property of women, not of the industry.
The same asymmetry shows up in language too. A “head of household” or a “default candidate” usually implies a man, and needs no qualifier to make that clear.
Male Identification
Male identification values traits coded “masculine”, like aggression and competitiveness, over traits coded “feminine”. Boys are pushed toward the first set.
Showing sensitivity puts a boy’s male identity in question. This is a valuation, not just a classification.
Because it devalues the feminine rather than just elevating the masculine, its effects run one way.
Croft, Schmader, and Block (2015) reviewed the evidence. Psychology has studied at length why women are kept out of male-typed roles like science. It has largely ignored why men don’t move into communal roles like nursing or childcare.
A woman moving up into masculine-coded work reads as ambition. A man moving down into feminine-coded work does not.
Sandra Bem’s work on androgyny challenged this valuation directly. She argued that psychologically healthy people combine masculine and feminine traits.
Male-Centeredness
Male-centeredness puts men at the centre of everything. They dominate history, hold leadership roles, and star in most films and TV.
Girls and women, correspondingly, are socialized to see a husband and children as their main goal. Their lives are taught to revolve around a man.
The formal name for this is androcentrism. It means judging the world from a male standpoint, and treating that as neutral.
This is not the same as hostility to women. Men’s ways of being need no explanation; women’s are the special case that does.
Sandra Bem (1993) placed androcentrism first among three “lenses of gender”. The other two are gender polarisation and biological essentialism.
This characteristic is unusually robust across cultures. Its exact content varies, but the underlying structure persists.
How Does Patriarchal Ideology Affect Society?
Patriarchy influences many areas of society, including the culture, school, family, the workplace, and relationships. A patriarchal society ensures that there remains a hierarchy of power, with (usually) white, heterosexual men at the top.
A major concept of patriarchy is social patriarchy, which means that there is patriarchy within organizations and institutions. These patriarchal institutions can include the government, where primarily men make much of the laws and legislations that govern society.
It can also include religious institutions such as the church, which traditionally maintains a lot of patriarchal values and rule over women.
In culture
Even in everyday life, patriarchal ideology can be present. For instance, women who experience sexual harassment on the street are often made to feel objectified by men who are asserting their power over women.
This is not limited to the street – women can often experience harassment in the online sphere, such as receiving unsolicited sexual messages (Burke Winkelman et al., 2015).
If one lives in a culture that sees men as being dominant over women, sexual harassment is likely to be more accepted and expected.
In education
Education is thought to be an agent of socialization into gender-appropriate behavior, contributing to the patriarchal system (Sultana, 2010).
Young girls may be socialized into thinking that subjects like mathematics and science suit boys better.
The subjects are gendered early.
Heaton and Lawson (1996) suggested that a hidden curriculum encourages patriarchal values in schools. They observed traditional family structures in textbooks and gender divisions in physical education.
Subjects were also aimed at specific genders. Staffing followed the same pattern: predominantly female teachers and male managers.
Does teacher bias like this actually change outcomes, or just reflect them? Carlana (2019) tested it directly.
Aim: to test whether teacher stereotypes affect students.
Specifically, does an implicit link between science and men shape achievement and choices?
Method: Italian teachers took an implicit-bias test linking gender to science.
Scores were matched to students’ results, confidence, and track choices.
Results: the maths gender gap widened with more stereotyped teachers.
Girls with these teachers did worse, felt less confident, and chose easier tracks.
Conclusion: teachers’ gender beliefs are not just private opinions. They measurably shape girls’ achievement, confidence, and future choices.
In the workplace
Patriarchal ideology can also be present in the workplace. Women may reach higher positions, but most senior roles are still held by men.
The pattern is global. A 2021 report found a limited presence of women in senior roles: just 42% of senior and managerial positions in the United States, and 36.8% in the United Kingdom.
The figures are lower still in Japan (14.7%) and Egypt (7.4%) (Global Gender Gap Report).
Home life is thought to play a part. Patriarchal attitudes practiced at home are frequently transferred into organizational settings, affecting men’s self-perceived superiority.
This leaves women dominated, discriminated against, and placed in inferior positions at work (Adisa et al., 2020).
This claim is directly testable. Correll, Benard, and Paik (2007) tested it in its sharpest form: the treatment of mothers.
Aim: to find out whether the wage penalty mothers face reflects discrimination based on beliefs about their competence and commitment, rather than real differences in productivity.
Method: a two-part design. A lab experiment had participants evaluate job applications from equally qualified candidates who differed only in parental status. This was paired with a field audit study that sent matched fictitious applications to real employers.
Results: in the lab, mothers were rated lower on competence and commitment and offered lower salaries. Fathers were not penalised, and sometimes benefited.
The audit study confirmed this in the field. Real employers called back mothers at markedly lower rates than equally qualified non-mothers, with no such penalty for fathers.
Conclusion: the motherhood penalty is substantially a discrimination effect driven by beliefs about what mothers are like, and it is specific to women.
What Is the Feminist View Of Patriarchy?
Feminists mainly view patriarchy as a system of political, social, and economic relations and institutions structured around the gender inequality of men and women (Nash, 2009).
Many forms of feminism characterize patriarchy as a present-day unjust social system that subordinates, discriminates, and oppresses women.
They treat patriarchal ideology as the root cause of gender inequality, not its decoration.
Traits seen as “feminine” are undervalued compared with “masculine” ones. Women’s contributions are, correspondingly, taken less seriously.
Under patriarchal ideology, women are largely excluded from the public sphere. They are instead confined to the role of wife and mother at home.
This shows up in institutions too. Women remain under-represented in the bodies that make major decisions and in senior employment, limiting their opportunity to drive change.
The main work assigned to women under patriarchy is domestic: chores, running the household, and childcare. This is women’s unpaid labor, and many feminists argue it should be paid.
The gap is well documented.
An imbalance remains even where more women hold paid work and positions of power today. It is harder for a woman to reach power in the public sphere for the simple reason that she is a woman.
Women are often only promoted into leadership when they display “masculine” traits, which are viewed as more desirable. That bar rarely applies to men.
Where women are seen as less valuable, they are also more vulnerable.
Many feminists argue this makes women more likely to be oppressed, exploited, and abused by men.
Women are expected to be obedient under patriarchy. Men may be excused for violence against a “disobedient” woman.
Under patriarchal ideology, women can also face multiple, intersecting forms of oppression based on their race, social class, and sexuality, among others.
Is Patriarchal Ideology Harmful?
Harms to Women
Patriarchal ideology is argued to harm women through gender-based violence. Many see intimate partner violence as largely a product of patriarchy.
Most of its serious forms are male-perpetrated (McKee, 2014).
A disproportionate share of intimate partner violence involves female victims, in some analyses as much as 85% of cases (Rennison & Welchans, 2000).
Women do sometimes use violence against male partners. This is often self-defense against male violence or threats (Allen, Swan, & Raghavan, 2009).
Reports of violence against women are also argued to be treated with more leniency toward men.
This can mean less justice for violent men. Many women come almost to expect violence for being a woman.
Ideology adds something specific here: it shapes how an act is judged.
Was it a crime, or a private matter? Was the victim blameless, or did she provoke it?
Harms to Men
Patriarchal ideology is also argued to harm men.
Men face strong expectations to display masculine traits: strength, assertiveness, rationality, even aggression.
They are taught that expressing feeling conflicts with their male identity. Suppressing emotion this way is argued to cause lasting damage.
This includes worse mental health, such as depression and anxiety.
It also raises the risk of suicide. Men die by suicide at several times the rate of women in most high-income countries (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020).
Why endorse a belief system that costs this much?
One answer: the cost is rarely blamed on the ideology itself. A norm felt as biology is not felt as a choice.
Even a man who privately rejects this norm can still feel pressure to perform it. That pressure helps explain why it persists.
Critical Evaluation of Patriarchal Ideology
A real objection faces this theory. A system that explains dominance, its acceptance, and its rejection risks explaining everything, and so nothing.
No finding could disprove that kind of claim. The modern literature answers this differently: with sharp, testable predictions.
Contemporary Research
Recent research moves patriarchal ideology from theory to measurement.
It asks three things. Does the ideology form a coherent system? Is it really passed to children? Can it be deliberately changed?
Is Sexism a Coordinated System?
Aim: Bareket and Fiske (2023) reviewed research on ambivalent sexism theory since 1996.
Their goal was simple: what do hostile and benevolent sexism actually do?
Method: reviewers screened 1,870 articles. They fully reviewed 654 eligible studies, all using the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory.
Results: five domains emerged. Social ideologies, violence, work, stereotypes, and relationships.
Hostile sexism ran on resentment, responding to threats to men’s power. Benevolent sexism ran on paternalism, responding to traditional roles.
Conclusion: sexism’s two faces are not separate attitudes that just correlate. They form one coordinated pair.
Can Patriarchal Attitudes Be Changed?
Aim: Dhar, Jain, and Jayachandran (2022) tested a school programme. Could it reduce teenagers’ support for restrictive gender norms, and would any change last?
Method: a randomised trial ran in Haryana, India, a setting with strongly restrictive norms. Adolescents took two years of classroom discussion on gender equality.
They were re-surveyed two years after it ended.
Results: attitudes shifted by 0.18 standard deviations. That converts around 16% of the regressive views held at the start.
The shift held two years later. It came with more gender-equal self-reported behaviour.
Conclusion: patriarchal beliefs formed in adolescence are not fixed. A cheap programme shifted them, and it held without further contact.
Evaluation: the effect is real but modest. Behaviour change lagged attitude change.
That gap fits a simple idea: people still feel pressure to conform, even once their own beliefs shift.
How It Compares With Rival Theories
Marxist feminism treats belief as a product of material relations.
Women’s unpaid labour benefits capital, on this view, so belief changes once that arrangement does.
But belief can outlive its cause by generations.
Societies whose ancestors used plough agriculture, which once excluded women from fieldwork, still show less equal attitudes today. This holds even among immigrants’ children raised somewhere else entirely (Alesina, Giuliano, & Nunn, 2013).
Radical feminism agrees patriarchy is the root of women’s oppression.
It locates this in men’s control of women’s bodies, not in belief.
Liberal feminism is the closest ally here, not a rival. It shares this article’s focus on attitudes, socialisation, and law.
Its programme of legal reform and anti-stereotyping in education and media follows directly from treating patriarchy as an ideology.
Social role theory reverses the causal arrow entirely. Eagly and Wood (1999) argued that stereotypes are the consequence of the division of labour, not its cause.
People infer that women are naturally caring because they are observed doing caring work. The belief then stabilises the arrangement that produced it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who introduced the concept of ‘patriarchal ideology’?
The concept is credited to Kate Millett. She set out her argument fully in Sexual Politics (Millett, 1970/2016).
Aim: Millett aimed to show that gender relations are political relations of dominance. She argued this rests less on force than on an ideology, transmitted through socialisation, that secures the consent of the subordinated.
Method: her approach was theoretical and literary-critical, not empirical.
She combined a theory of patriarchy’s dimensions with close readings of sexual scenes in mid-century male novelists’ fiction, read as evidence of their culture’s sexual politics.
Findings: Millett argued patriarchy’s real instrument is not law or violence, but socialisation into consensus. The family teaches temperament, role, and status as fact, before a child can question any of it.
Conclusion: patriarchy is a political institution. Its ideology is how it is maintained. Because that ideology is learned, not innate, Millett argued it can be unlearned.
Evaluation: Millett’s book supplied much of the vocabulary of second-wave feminism. Its method has limits, though.
Literary texts show what a culture publishes and praises, not what people believe or do. Generalising from a few Western novelists to patriarchy as such is a large, untested leap.
What is the patriarchal view of the family?
A patriarchal view of the family sees the man, usually the husband or father, as the head of the house. He holds the authority and makes the decisions.
A woman must often ask her husband’s permission first.
Marriage traditionally required a father’s permission too. This treated women as unable to choose for themselves.
In many cultures, the father “gives away” his daughter to her husband on her wedding day. This is almost treated as an exchange of property between men.
The woman takes her husband’s surname. Their children carry it too.
She is expected to stay home, tending house and children. This is unpaid labor, unlike her husband’s paid work.
What is the main difference between patriarchal ideology and feminist ideology?
Patriarchal ideology and feminist ideology are two completely opposing concepts. The main difference between the two is the position of women. In a patriarchy, women face oppression and discrimination on the basis of their gender.
Whereas, in feminist ideology, women have equal rights to men and do not experience oppression on the basis of gender.
References
Adisa, T. A., Cooke, F. L., & Iwowo, V. (2019). Mind your attitude: the impact of patriarchy on women’s workplace behaviour. Career Development International.
Allen, C. T., Swan, S. C., & Raghavan, C. (2009). Gender symmetry, sexism, and intimate partner violence. Journal of interpersonal violence, 24 (11), 1816-1834.
Burke Winkelman, S., Oomen-Early, J., Walker, A. D., Chu, L., & Yick-Flanagan, A. (2015). Exploring cyber harassment among women who use social media. Universal Journal of Public Health, 3(5), 194–201.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) Fatal Injury Reports. (2020, February 20). Retrieved August 23, 2022, from https://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate.html
Heaton, J. & Lawson, D. (1996). Feminism and Education. History LearningSite.co.uk. 2014. Web. Russ-Books.
McKee, J. R. (2014). Patriarchal ideology and violence against women: A theoretical contribution using longitudinal, individual-level analyses. Old Dominion University.
Millett, K. (2016). Sexual politics. Columbia University Press.
Nash, C. J. (2009). Patriarchy. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 102–107). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00982-2
Rennison, C. M., & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Sultana, A. (2010). Patriarchy and women’s subordination: a theoretical analysis. Arts Faculty Journal, 1-18.
World Economic Forum. (March 2021). Global Gender Gap Report 2021. Insight Report. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2021.pdf
