Postmodernism in Sociology

In sociology, postmodernism is a perspective that emphasizes the social construction of reality and the fragmentation of identities in contemporary society. It stresses the role of language and discourse (the shared ways of talking and thinking about a topic that shape what people accept as true) in shaping knowledge.

Postmodernism vs. Modernism

Postmodernism arose largely as a reaction against the intellectual premises of modernism which were widely acclaimed during the Enlightenment era.

In fact, many of postmodernism”s foundational doctrines could be characterized as outright denials of modernism’s basic assumptions heretofore taken for granted.

Objective Reality: Enlightenment-era philosophy generally affirmed the existence of objective reality as well as the logical independence of its natural properties from human concepts, customs, and communities. Postmodernism rejects this notion as an ill-formed realism, and holds that such reality is merely a conceptual construct.
Truth as Construction: The main difference between modernism and postmodernism is that postmodernism is a reaction against the belief in objective truth that was characteristic of modernism.

Postmodernists believe that there is no such thing as objective reality, and that all knowledge is socially constructed. Indeed, a subscription to the idea of objective truth is tantamount to ideology. Modernists, on the other hand, believed in objective reality and the power of reason to discover truths about the world (Brooker, 2014).

Postmodernists assert that all facets of human psychology are socially determined, and that, contrary to modernist philosophy, there is no such thing as human nature comprising aptitudes, faculties, and dispositions which are neither learned nor instilled by society.
Claims of Truth or Falsity: Modernism held that descriptions and explanations offered by historians and scientists could be either false or true in principle. Postmodernists dismiss such a notion based on their refusal to accept an objective reality.
Science and Technology: Postmodernism denies modernism’s trust in technology and science as vital instruments of human advancement. Some postmodernists even hold that logic and reason are inherently oppressive and destructive because evil individuals have such faculties to oppress and destroy others.
Logic and Reason: Modernism had held that logic and reason were universally valid, and that they could be applied to any domain of knowledge. Postmodernists however, view even logic and reason as merely conceptual constructs applicable only within their respective intellectual traditions.
Language: Modernism argues that language reflects an external reality, representing nature. Postmodernists reject this view and maintain that it is semantically self-referential or self-contained.
Certainty: Modernism had held that humans could procure knowledge concerning nature and reality, and that principles or evidence which could be known with certainty, intuitively, or immediately could justify such knowledge.

Postmodernists repudiate this attempt to identify a supposed basis of certainty to construct empirical/scientific knowledge.
Grand Theories: The Enlightenment outlook had held that it is possible to build theories to explain many facets of the social or natural world in various fields of knowledge, and that an objective of historical and scientific research is to build such theories.

Postmodernism, however, renounces such theories as both false and pernicious. Postmodernists contend that such theories could oppress, silence, and marginalize other perspectives in a totalitarian fashion.
Individual vs. Collective: Another difference between modernism and postmodernism is that modernism is focused on the individual, while postmodernism is focused on the collective. Modernists believed that the individual was the best source of knowledge, while postmodernists believe that knowledge is produced collectively through discourse. In the eyes of postmodernism, The “self” is a myth and largely a composite of one’s social experiences and cultural contexts — it is even an Ideology (Faigley, 1993).
Progress vs. Deconstruction: Finally, modernism is concerned with progress, while postmodernism is concerned with deconstruction. Modernists believe that progress is possible and that society can be improved through the application of reason. Postmodernists, on the other hand, argue that progress is not possible and that all social institutions are flawed (Brooker, 2014).

Characteristics of Postmodernism

Several recurring features distinguish postmodernist thought, each explored in full further below:

Rejection of Grand Narratives: postmodernism doubts sweeping “grand narratives,” such as the Enlightenment story of progress through reason or the Marxist story of history moving toward a classless society, that claim to explain society as a whole.
Hyperreality and Simulacra: Baudrillard argued that images and signs have replaced reality itself, so that a media-saturated society lives in a “hyperreal” world where the copy can feel more real than the original.
Power, Knowledge, and Discourse: Foucault argued that knowledge is never neutral; it is produced by, and serves, relations of power, with major institutions such as schools, government, and healthcare shaping what counts as truth.
Deconstruction: Derrida’s method of closely reading a text to expose the unstable, self-undermining assumptions behind its apparently fixed meaning.
Relativism: postmodernism denies that there is a single, objective reality or truth, holding instead that knowledge, values, and even facts are shaped by the discourses of a particular time, place, and social group.
Fragmentation of Identity: the postmodern self is treated as fluid and socially constructed rather than fixed, built up from multiple, sometimes conflicting, social experiences and cultural contexts rather than a single stable “self.”

Examples

The Family

Postmodernists are critical of the idea of the nuclear family as a “natural” and “normal” institution.

They argue that the nuclear family is a social construct that has been created and maintained by powerful institutions such as the government and the media.

Family life, for postmodernists such as Stacey (1998), is not a fixed concept. It is pluralistic: diverse, variable, and unstable.

Because the family is always changing, there is no such thing as a perfect or ideal family. (Postmodernism and the Family).

In the eyes of postmodernists, postmodern families have six characteristics that differentiate themselves from modern families:

Liberated sexual attitudes.
Voluntary childlessness.
Reproductive technologies: developments in embryo transplants, in-vitro fertilization, and surrogacy has made it possible for non-nuclear families to conceive.
Diverse parenting arrangements: parents are increasingly both working, divorced, or in reconstituted families leading to co parenting arrangements
The crisis of masculinity: a reaction to the diminishment of skilled highly-paid work for men and the imagining of alternative masculinities such as carers (Ghaill, 1996)
Consumption: where family members are concerned with what their fellow consumers think of their consumption habits.

This results in conspicuous consumption of status items and experiences, such as vacations.

Some argue that even children are being viewed by parents as fashion accessories, as parents spend considerable sums of money on their children to show off to their neighbors, friends, relatives, and others.

Postmodernists are also critical of the way that the nuclear family is portrayed in the media.

They argue that the media presents a false image of the nuclear family as a happy, harmonious unit. In reality, postmodernists argue, families are often conflicted and dysfunctional.

Religion

Postmodernism has also shaped how sociologists think about religion. Religion was once seen as a source of objective truth.

Postmodernists reject that. They argue religion is a social construct, created and maintained by powerful institutions such as government and the media, and that there is no objective truth for it to reveal.

Postmodernists also see religion as a source of conflict rather than harmony. Religious beliefs, they argue, more often produce division than understanding and tolerance.

Finally, postmodernists treat religion as a private matter. No one, on this view, should have religion imposed on them; everyone has the right to practise their own faith, or none at all.

One postmodernist thinker on religion is Hervieu-Leger (2000). She claims that secularization is really a form of ‘cultural amnesia.’

Postmodern societies, on this account, have lost their religious memory. Children have faltering connections to extended family and diminishing Sunday school attendance, so religion is no longer handed down from generation to generation. Postmodern parents instead let children decide their own religious beliefs.

Religion has not disappeared, though. Hervieu-Leger argues that individual consumerism has replaced collective tradition: people now ‘shop’ for beliefs that suit them, amid far greater diversity and choice.

This has produced two groups of religious people in postmodern society: pilgrims and converts. Pilgrims follow an individual path in search of self-discovery. Converts join religious groups that offer a strong sense of belonging, usually based on a shared ethnic background or religious doctrine.

Education

In the view of postmodernism, schools are more ‘consumerist’ and offer more individual choice than ever before.

People once generally attended the local school determined by their social class. In the postmodern era, though, parents can choose from a multitude of schools, shopping around for whichever one suits their child best.

This increased choice has made education more ‘consumerist’. Parents are treated as customers purchasing a service for their children.

Education has also become more individualized and diverse. Specialist schools focused on a single subject have emerged, and apprenticeship and training programs are now run privately by thousands of employers.

Teachers, too, must vary their methods. They are expected to use a range of teaching approaches to suit students’ different ‘learning styles.’

Education has become more hyperreal, in Baudrillard’s sense. Schools make far greater use of technology, and students increasingly turn to online sources for support, or even as their primary source of instruction (Thompson, 2019).

Postmodernism also critiques how knowledge is presented in schools. Knowledge, on this view, is not neutral or objective but a product of power relations: the ideas and values of the ruling class are promoted, while alternative perspectives are marginalized.

Finally, postmodernists critique education as a tool of social control. Schools, they argue, often instill conformity and submissiveness rather than critical thinking and creativity (Thompson, 2019).

Youth and Subcultures

The concept of subculture was first developed by sociologist John Clarke in the late 1970s. Clarke defined subcultures as groups who share values and beliefs that differ from the wider culture.

Postmodernists critique earlier subculture research for focusing mainly on deviant groups, such as gangs, while ignoring the many other kinds of sub-cultural group that exist.

They also reject the idea that subcultures are fixed. Subcultures, on this view, are constantly changing and fluid, driven above all by globalization and the rapid growth of digital media.

Social media has been especially influential. It has widened lifestyle choice, increased fluidity and hybridity in identity, and diminished the role of older shapers of culture such as social class, gender, and ethnicity.

Subcultures are not simply opposed to mainstream culture, either. Postmodernists argue that they often borrow from, and interact with, the wider culture (Clark, 2003).

Dick Hebdige (1979) is a key postmodernist thinker on youth subcultures. He argues that subcultures respond to the alienation and disenchantment young people feel in modern society.

Style, Hebdige claims, is the tool. Young people use music, fashion, and language to build a distinct identity and resist the values of the dominant culture.

Subcultures rarely last, though. Hebdige argues they are typically short-lived, quickly becoming commercialized and absorbed by mainstream culture.

Health and Social Care

Postmodern cultural values have reshaped the physician-patient relationship. It is no longer seen as a ‘sacred’ or ‘special’ bond.

Instead, it is now a more ‘normal’ human interaction, like any other. Patients now have more say. Power has shifted from doctor to patient, who is treated as an active participant in their own healthcare.

Patients are given more information and choice, and are expected to take a greater role in decisions. Choice matters. They can even “shop” around for a doctor who matches their own individualistic health philosophy (Rolfe, 2001).

Changing cultural values, new technologies, and rising healthcare costs have all driven this shift.

Health and social care delivery has changed too. Services once run on a ‘one size fits all’ model are now more personalized and individualized, through models such as day care and home care.

Care has also moved away from traditional institutions, such as hospitals and nursing homes, toward more community-based provision (Rolfe, 2001).

This mirrors the wider Foucauldian argument above. Doctors’ medicalized authority was never simply a fact about medicine. Its erosion here is the same shift in power and knowledge, playing out in a new setting.

Postmodernism Thinkers

Michel Foucault

Michel Foucault was a French philosopher best known for giving rise to philosophical postmodernism in the 1970s and 1980s. Foucault’s work has had a significant impact on the fields of sociology, anthropology, and education.

Foucault (1977) argued that knowledge is not neutral or objective, but is instead a product of power relations.

Power works through knowledge.

He contended that the ideas and values of the ruling class are promoted in major institutions such as schools, government, and healthcare, while alternative perspectives are marginalized.

A doctor’s claim to know about health is itself a claim to power. It is exercised through the hospital or clinic where that knowledge is put into practice.

Foucault traced this back to Bentham’s Panopticon.

This ideal prison had cells around a central watchtower fitted with blinds, so guards could see prisoners at all times without ever being seen themselves.

Inmates could never know if they were being watched. Foucault argued they therefore had to act as though they always were.

This self-surveillance is now a general feature of modern organisations. A call-centre worker who cannot know whether a call is monitored keeps every call short and by-the-book, just in case.

Foucault also argued that major social institutions are increasingly using methods of ‘control and surveillance’. Foucault is also known for his method of genealogy, tracing how a supposedly timeless fact, such as madness or criminality, was actually produced through specific historical processes. He called this excavation a “counter-memory” (Drolet, 2004).

Jean-François Lyotard

Jean-François Lyotard was a French philosopher who is best known for his work on postmodernism. In 1979, Lyotard published The Postmodern Condition, in which he argued that postmodernity is characterized by a rejection of grand narratives.

He was largely responsible for transferring the term from the realm of art criticism to philosophy and the social sciences.

He named this pattern the metanarrative.

A metanarrative, in Lyotard’s sense, is an overarching story a society tells about itself to justify its own knowledge and institutions.

For Lyotard, the Enlightenment’s story of scientific progress and the Marxist story of history moving toward a classless society were the two grand narratives organising the modern West.

Lyotard argued that both had lost their power to convince.

This was not simple pessimism. He traced it to a real shift in how knowledge itself is produced. In advanced societies, he argued, knowledge increasingly circulates as a commodity valued for its usefulness to power and the market, not for its place in a grand story.

Lyotard proposed something different. Legitimate knowledge, he said, is now judged locally, against the rules of each specific field.

Physics answers to its own standards, law to its own, and so on for every field.

What replaces the grand narrative, on this account, is not chaos but a spread of small, local stories that Lyotard called petits récits. They make no claim to speak for everyone.

Jean Baudrillard

Jean Baudrillard was a French sociologist and philosopher who is best known for his work on postmodernism and consumerism.

Baudrillard’s (1976) work has had a significant impact on the field of cultural studies.

He argued that the concept of reality has been replaced by simulations and simulacra. It does not stop there. Signs and images, on this view, have now replaced reality itself.

He explained this with a four-stage account.

At first, an image is a faithful copy of something real. It then starts to mask and distort that reality, while still pointing to something real behind the distortion.

The third stage goes further still. The image now masks the absence of any real thing behind it at all.

In the fourth and final stage, the image is a pure simulacrum: a copy with no original, that only means something by reference to other images.

Baudrillard called this hyperreal. The distinction between the real and its representation has collapsed entirely, so that images do not distort reality so much as replace it.

A rolling news story or a viral image can feel more real than the event itself. That, for Baudrillard, is hyperreality at work.

Judith Butler

Judith Butler is an American philosopher and gender theorist whose work has been extremely influential within the field of postmodern feminism.

Butler”s most famous work is Gender Trouble, in which she challenges the idea that there is a natural, essential difference between men and women.

Instead, Butler argues that gender is something that is performed. This means that it is not something that people are born with, but something they do (Butler, 2002).

Relativism & Postmodernism

Some postmodernists reject the label of relativism. Even so, the affinity between postmodernist doctrines and epistemological, metaphysical, and ethical relativism is hard to miss (Duignan, n.d.).

Postmodernism denies objective reality. It dismisses the idea that any description of reality could be objectively true or false, or even known with certainty.

It goes further still. Postmodernism repudiates absolute moral values altogether, holding that knowledge, reality, and values are all products of discourses that may themselves evolve.

On this view, science has no special authority. Postmodernists argue that the modern scientific method has no greater claim to truth than perspectives such as witchcraft or astrology. They describe its evidential standards, such as logic and reason, as merely ‘Enlightenment rationality.’

This follows from postmodernism’s relativism. A society’s discourses, which shape its governing values, are held to reflect the norms of its dominant groups rather than any neutral standard.

Michel Foucault made the same point about knowledge itself. Even the definition of ‘knowledge’ in a given period, he argued, is shaped by power relations.

Postmodernists conclude that Enlightenment discourses were arbitrary, serving elite interests, and ought to be changed. They also claim their own approach is uniquely inclusive, recognizing perspectives that mainstream thought marginalizes.

Real-World Applications

Postmodern ideas are not confined to theory. Several applied fields now use them as working tools.

Media Studies

Baudrillard’s hyperreality has become a standard lens in media studies. Rolling coverage of a trial, a war, or a disaster, increasingly on social media as well as television, is rarely analysed as a simple report on events anymore.

Instead, scholars treat the coverage itself as shaping how a mass audience experiences and remembers what happened. Most viewers never have direct, unmediated access to the events themselves.

This challenges an older, more optimistic view. Earlier media theorists such as Habermas (1987) took a different position.

They assumed mass media chiefly informs an already-existing public about events happening elsewhere. Postmodern media scholars reject that. In their view, coverage partly manufactures the reality the public takes those events to be, rather than merely reporting on it from a neutral distance.

Consumer Culture

The postmodern account of “conspicuous consumption,” discussed above under The Family, generalises further. It becomes a wider theory of consumer culture.

Identity itself, on this view, is increasingly built through what a person buys, wears, and displays. That is the core claim. Occupation, religion, and region matter much less than they once did.

Brands and lifestyle goods function as circulating signs, in Baudrillard’s sense. Their meaning comes from their place within a wider system of other signs, not from any inherent usefulness.

This idea also entered criminology. A “cultural criminology” and “deviant leisure” literature draws on it to explain how consumer capitalism inscribes status anxiety into everyday leisure. The result, this literature argues, can generate real psychological and social harm, independent of any law ever being broken.

Politics and Post-Truth

Two arguments converge in debates about “post-truth politics.”

Lyotard held that grand narratives have lost their power to persuade. Baudrillard held that political reality is increasingly built through media images rather than simply reported by them.

Together, these ideas are widely invoked. Sympathetic and hostile commentators alike treat postmodernism as an intellectual precursor of the post-truth climate.

The reasoning runs like this. Decades of academic argument that all truth-claims are perspectival, so the theory goes, prepared the ground for “alternative facts” and rival, camp-specific narratives to be asserted with comparatively little cost.

A related development is new social movement theory. It analyses movements organised around culture and identity, such as environmentalism, rather than the class-based interests central to older social-movement theory (Buechler, 1995).

Digital Culture

Social media, algorithmically curated feeds, and convincing “deepfake” media have given Baudrillard’s hyperreality thesis a second life.

Consider a curated social-media feed, an AI-generated persona, or a virtual influencer with no real-world counterpart. Each extends his argument in an even more literal form.

Images can generate effects on their own. Engagement, purchasing behaviour, and emotional attachment follow. None of it needs a tie to any underlying reality.

Whether this literature actually demonstrates hyperreality, or merely illustrates it with well-chosen examples, remains an open and honestly-debated question among the scholars who study it.

A single viral image or influencer post makes a striking example. Researchers are careful to note that an example is not yet solid proof of the theory itself.

Critical Evaluation

Postmodernism has been criticized for its rejection of grand narratives and its focus on simulation and simulacra. Some argue it leads to a loss of meaning and nihilism, or that it is a form of escapism from the real world.

The four arguments below examine this criticism, and three others, against named sources rather than simply asserting them:

Self-Refutation: if all values are socially constructed, postmodernism’s own critique of injustice is just as arbitrary an invention.
Relativism and Inequality: denying objective truth struggles to explain durable, measurable inequalities of class, gender, and ethnicity.
Foucauldian Surveillance: the panopticon model captures something real, but over-generalizes from the prison to the ordinary workplace.
A Durable Contribution: postmodernism has still opened space for marginalized perspectives and supplied useful critical methods.

Self-Refutation

Postmodernism’s own claim that Enlightenment discourses are unjust and arbitrary creates a problem for the theory itself.

If all values are socially constructed, postmodernism’s own critique is just as arbitrary an invention.

The philosopher Roger Scruton put it sharply.

“A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is “merely relative,” is asking you not to believe him. So don’t” (Scruton, 1996).

Habermas (1987) raised a related worry.

A theory that rejects reason and universal validity leaves itself no standpoint from which to criticize domination. Any such criticism must appeal to some standard that survives the theory’s own relativizing move.

On this reading, Foucault, Lyotard, and Derrida owed the Enlightenment ideals they attacked more than they were willing to admit.

Relativism and Inequality

The sociologist Steve Bruce (2002) rejects postmodern relativism and the idea that all truths carry equal weight.

Science, he argues, is consistently superior in its outcomes to other methods of inquiry.

Sociologists in this line of thinking argue postmodernists underestimate the continuing role that group identities play in shaping people’s actions.

Class, age, and ethnicity still matter.

Postmodernism’s focus on fragmentation and discourse, on this view, struggles to explain the durable, measurable patterning of income, health, and education by class and gender.

The critique found its most publicized test case in 1996.

The physicist Alan Sokal submitted a paper to the journal Social Text, deliberately mixing fashionable postmodern rhetoric with claims about quantum physics (Sokal, 1996). On his own account, the physics claims were logically unconnected and sometimes simply false.

The journal published it without evident concern for its scientific coherence, and Sokal revealed the hoax immediately after.

It remains a single, contested case. But it is still widely cited alongside Bruce’s argument.

Foucauldian Surveillance

Foucault’s account of the panopticon has been tested directly against a real workplace, with mixed results.

Sewell and Wilkinson (1992) applied the panopticon model to a Japanese-owned electronics factory using just-in-time production.

They argued its statistical process control and peer-visible performance data created a genuinely self-surveilling workforce, close to Foucauldian terms.

Webster and Robins (1993) responded directly.

They argued the study overstated how far surveillance alone explains workplace order. Workers actively interpreted, resisted, and sometimes subverted the monitoring regime, rather than simply internalizing it.

Read together, the exchange supports a qualified version of Foucault’s claim.

His account captured something real about modern institutional life. But generalizing from the coercive prison to workplaces that depend on willing cooperation overstates how far surveillance alone explains order.

A Durable Contribution

Postmodernism has also been credited with opening space for perspectives that a more totalizing social science had tended to marginalize.

Feminist, postcolonial, and queer theory are the clearest beneficiaries.

Judith Butler’s postmodern-feminist performativity thesis, discussed above, is itself one of the clearest examples of this widening effect. It is an idea about gender that a more totalizing social science would never have generated.

The effect is real.

Deconstruction and discourse analysis have also supplied genuinely useful, exportable methods.

Close, sceptical reading of how a text or policy document builds its own authority continues to be used by researchers who reject postmodernism’s fuller relativist metaphysics.

Demasi’s (2020) discursive-psychological approach to post-truth politics, discussed below, is a direct example of this kind of productive borrowing.

Weighed together, postmodernism’s diagnostic instincts have proved durable. Its suspicion of totalizing claims, and its attention to power operating through knowledge, are still useful today. Its most radical conclusions, though, remain heavily contested.

Contemporary Research

Recent research has begun testing postmodern claims empirically, rather than only arguing for them philosophically.

The evidence is best described as early and modest. It is no longer purely speculative, though.

Aim: De Witt et al. (2016) set out to build a survey instrument distinguishing distinct “worldviews,” including a specifically postmodern one.

They also tested whether holding a postmodern worldview predicts concern about climate change.

Climate concern was the outcome.

Method: the authors built a multi-item scale distinguishing traditional, modern, postmodern, and integrative worldviews.

They gave it to representative samples in the Netherlands (n = 527) and the United States (n = 556), alongside measures of climate concern and sustainable behaviour.

Results: respondents classified as postmodern or integrative reported significantly greater climate concern and more sustainable behaviour than those classified as modern or traditional.

Conclusion: a “postmodern worldview” is not just a philosophical abstraction.

It can be measured as a distinct orientation in the general population, with real consequences for environmentally relevant attitudes and behaviour.

A second, more direct test follows.

It is a 2025 study of an online skincare community.

Sinağ et al. (2025) asked whether social media dissolves a coherent consumer identity into Kenneth Gergen’s “saturated self,” as the strong version of postmodern theory predicts.

One question mattered most.

Aim: to test Gergen’s “saturated self” concept within an actively consuming online community.

Method: 13 semi-structured interviews with skincare enthusiasts who followed social-media influencers, analysed against postmodern consumer-identity theory.

Results: participants’ consumer identities did change under exposure to fragmented, sometimes conflicting information.

But they did not change into an incoherent self. Instead, participants became more discerning, actively selecting whom to follow.

Conclusion: the milder postmodern claim, that identity is actively constructed through social-media consumption, was supported.

The stronger “saturated self” claim, that this exposure dissolves identity into incoherence, was not.

A related study of Finnish teenagers’ consumption habits (Wilska et al., 2023) points the same way.

Social media actively shapes consumer identity. The strongest fragmentation-to-incoherence version of the theory, though, remains an open rather than a confirmed claim.

Key Takeaways

Core Claim: Postmodernism stresses the uncertain nature of societies where all certainties have been challenged, describing a lived experience in a global society without absolute rules or explanations.
No Single Truth: Postmodernists hold there is no definite truth in science, only a plurality of “narratives” and “perspectives” built through discourse and lived experience.
Key Thinkers: Jean Baudrillard, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, and Jean-François Lyotard are its most influential theorists.
Vs. Enlightenment: Postmodernism rejects the Enlightenment project of understanding and controlling society through rational thought, holding that constant change makes society impossible to grasp rationally.
Origins: It emerged as a Western philosophical movement in the late 20th century, challenging premises of Western philosophy from the 17th to 19th centuries.
Character: It is generally marked by extreme subjectivism, broad cynicism, hostility toward reason, and a tendency to trace cultural norms to elite ideologies.
Timeline: Early features appear in artists like Jorge Luis Borges around the 1940s (Barth, 1967); postmodernism began competing with modernism in the 1950s and prevailed by the 1960s (Huyssen, 1986).

Further Information

Cite this article

Pick a style, copy the reference, or download it to your reference manager.

Updated 17 Sep 2026

Perera, A. (2026). Postmodernism in Sociology. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/postmodernism.html

Download .ris Download .bib

References

Aylesworth, Gary (2015) [1st pub. 2005]. “Postmodernism”. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. sep-postmodernism (Spring 2015 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Barth, John (August 1976). “The Literature of Exhaustion.” The Atlantic Monthly, pp. 29–34.

Baudrillard, J. (1976). Symbolic exchange and death. London: Sage.

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation . University of Michigan press.

Brooker, P. (2014). Modernism/postmodernism . Routledge.

Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the West (Vol. 3). Oxford: Blackwell.

Butler, J. (2002). Gender trouble. Routledge.

Clark, D. (2003). The death and life of punk, the last subculture. The post-subcultures reader, 1.

De Witt, A., de Boer, J., Hedlund, N., & Osseweijer, P. (2016). A new tool to map the major worldviews in the Netherlands and USA, and explore how they relate to climate change. Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.012

Demasi, M. A. (2020). Post-truth politics and discursive psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14 (9), Article e12556. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12556

Drolet, M. (2004). The postmodernism reader: foundational texts.

Dunn, T., & Castro, A. (2012). Postmodern society and the individual: The structural characteristics of postmodern society and how they shape who we think we are. The social science journal, 49 (3), 352-358

Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture and style. na.

Hervieu-Leger, D. (2000). Religion as a Chain of Memory (p. 133). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Hutcheon, L. (2003). The politics of postmodernism. Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1977). Language, counter-memory, practice. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Cornell University Press.

Faigley, L. (1993). Fragments of rationality: Postmodernity and the subject of composition. University of Pittsburgh Pre.

Ghaill, M. M. A. (1996). ‘What about the boys?’: schooling, class and crisis of masculinity. The Sociological Review, 44 (3), 381-397.

Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures (F. Lawrence, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1985)

Huyssen, Andreas (1986). After the Great Divide. Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Lash, S. (2014). Sociology of postmodernism. Routledge.

Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (Vol. 10). U of Minnesota Press.

Rolfe, G. (2001). Postmodernism for healthcare workers in 13 easy steps. Nurse Education Today, 21 (1), 38-47.

Scruton, Roger (1996). Modern philosophy: an introduction and survey. New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-024907-9.

Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B. (1992). ‘Someone to watch over me’: Surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26 (2), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038592026002009

Sinağ, C., Toker, A., Çoşkun, A., & Hayran, C. (2025). Postmodern consumer identity projects on social media: Skincare consumer tribe. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 13 (1), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v13i1.2481

Sokal, A. D. (1996). Transgressing the boundaries: Toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, (46/47), 217-252. https://doi.org/10.2307/466856

Stacey, J. (1998). Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late-twentieth-century America. Univ of California Press.

Thompson, K. (2019). Postmodernism and education.

Vattimo, G. (1988). The end of modernity: Nihilism and hermeneutics in post-modern culture.

Webster, F., & Robins, K. (1993). ‘I’ll be watching you’: Comment on Sewell and Wilkinson. Sociology, 27 (2), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038593027002004

Wilska, T.-A., Holkkola, M., & Tuominen, J. (2023). The role of social media in the creation of young people’s consumer identities. SAGE Open, 13 (2), Article 21582440231177030. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231177030