ADHD Doomscrolling

Doomscrolling is repetitive scrolling through mostly negative online content, usually with difficulty stopping. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects not only how we focus and organize, but also how we engage with digital media.

Many ADHD individuals find themselves doomscrolling even when it leaves them anxious and drained.

This habit of consuming bad news despite feeling worse is like getting stuck in a “digital quicksand” of negativity. Each swipe pulls you in deeper.

For someone with ADHD, doomscrolling may be harder to stop. Differences in reward, impulse control and time perception are plausible reasons, though no study has tested this directly.

Social media is designed to keep us scrolling (Montag et al., 2019). Tailored algorithms supply endless content on topics that interest us. Anyone can get caught in a doomscroll.

Learning the impact of doomscrolling and strategies to reduce this behavior is the first step in engaging in healthier social media consumption.

Why Doomscrolling Hooks the ADHD Brain

Why Anyone Can Get Hooked

Not everything here is specific to ADHD. Most people who doomscroll do not have ADHD. Several ordinary mechanisms pull anyone towards negative feeds.

Negativity bias is the tendency for bad information to have more impact than good. The effect shows in the body. In a 17-country study of 1,156 people, reactions to negative news video were, on average, stronger than to positive news (Soroka et al., 2019).

Monitoring means coping with a threat by seeking as much information as you can. Strong monitors tend to stay anxious (Miller, 1987). A feed has no end. That removes the natural stopping points of a newspaper or news bulletin.

Unpredictable rewards also sustain behaviour. Most feed items are dull, but you cannot tell in advance which will be funny, shocking or important.

Finally, relief keeps the loop going. Scrolling can briefly soothe worry, which strengthens the habit, while the content supplies fresh worry. None of these four mechanisms has been tested directly as an explanation of doomscrolling.

Dopamine and Novelty Cravings

One reason doomscrolling is hard to put down is reward. Dopamine is the neurotransmitter that supports feelings of reward and motivation, and ADHD is associated with differences in how it signals.

A study of 53 adults diagnosed with ADHD found lower binding of dopamine transporters and receptors in parts of the reward pathway (Volkow et al., 2009).

That measures the availability of proteins, not the amount of dopamine itself. “Low dopamine” is a simplification.

Seeking stimulation may be the brain’s way to get a quick dopamine boost, and the internet provides an endless supply of novel content. No study has tested this for scrolling.

Clinical psychologist Ellen Littman, Ph.D., explains the pattern.

“ADHD brains experience a surge of motivation after a high-stimulation behavior triggers a release of dopamine, but in the aftermath… they return to baseline with an immediate drop in motivation.”

In other words, even if one more scroll isn’t truly satisfying, the ADHD brain still craves that next little “hit” of reward.

Doomscrolling provides continuous mini-rewards and emotional intensity that keep the ADHD brain hooked.

“I realize that I can’t go five minutes without searching for the minimal dopamine hit I can get from TikTok.”

Impulse Control and Hyperfocus

Beyond brain chemistry, ADHD involves challenges with impulse control and self-regulation.

The impulse to click on the next intriguing link or refresh the feed can overpower the voice telling you to stop.

ADHDers can be very “bingey” and tend to check their phones repeatedly, which fits differences in impulse control.

Research in the general population supports the link. In a study of 112 young adults, attentional impulsivity was the main correlate of problematic social network use (Wegmann et al., 2020). None of them was selected for ADHD.

Once engaged, stopping can feel almost impossible.

ADHD also brings the tendency to hyperfocus, a state of intense absorption in which other things go unnoticed. Some people describe getting “locked in” on an interesting stimulus.

What might be a brief news check for someone else can turn into hours lost. An ADHDer may tumble down the rabbit hole of related posts. Hyperfocus is self-reported, and no study has tested it with a scrolling task.

“28 videos down, I can’t get up anymore, I’m landlocked to the desolate island that is my couch.”

Time Blindness

Many ADHD individuals also describe time blindness, an informal label for not noticing how much time has passed. It is not a diagnostic term.

Research on timing backs part of the idea. A meta-analysis of 55 studies found that ADHDers are less accurate at judging durations from milliseconds to several seconds (Marx et al., 2022). Those tasks last seconds, so they do not show that hours of scrolling are misjudged.

During a doomscrolling session, hours can slip away. Concerns about staying up too late or neglecting tasks get overshadowed by the immediate reward of continuing to scroll.

Everyone loses track of time when absorbed, and people’s own estimates of their digital media use are only moderately accurate (Parry et al., 2021).

Dr. Littman puts it simply. For a dopamine-hungry ADHD brain, “concerns about time or consequences are dwarfed by the pursuit of pleasurable reinforcement.”

In short, doomscrolling offers constant stimulation, frequent little rewards and an easy outlet for impulsivity, while time slips by. It is no surprise that many ADHDers describe feeling “sucked in” to this behavior. Whether these routes explain doomscrolling has not yet been tested.

Expert Insights

Mental health professionals and ADHD experts have observed the link between ADHD and doomscrolling. Each view is set beside what the research shows.

Alex Dimitriu and Russell Barkley: Drawn to Screens

Dr. Alex Dimitriu, a psychiatrist, notes that ADHDers can end up bingeing on negative content online. He calls it the “mental equivalent of bingeing on potato chips… and equally hard to stop.”

He explains that humans naturally have a negativity bias. The ADHD brain, he says, doesn’t necessarily discriminate between positive or negative stimulation. It just seeks intensity and novelty.

This means bad news can hook an ADHD brain as much as good news, sometimes even more.

No study has tested that claim directly. The one cross-national study of reactions to news found a negativity bias on average, with large individual differences, but it had no ADHD group (Soroka et al., 2019).

Russell Barkley, a clinical psychologist and ADHD researcher, says in a 2023 lecture that ADHD children and adults tend to drift towards screen time. He lists social media, television and internet games (Barkley, 2023).

As opinion, this is consistent with the moderate associations found in meta-analyses (Ding et al., 2025; Augner et al., 2023).

It is a general observation about screens, not doomscrolling. He offers no mechanism specific to scrolling.

Eric Tivers and Ellen Littman: The Dopamine Account

Eric Tivers, an ADHD coach, notes how the design of online platforms exploits ADHD traits. He uses an analogy.

Trying to satiate an understimulated ADHD brain with quick internet hits is like “trying to fill a bucket with a hole in it.” The pleasure leaks out as quickly as it comes.

You might scroll for stimulation but never feel fully satisfied, leading you to keep going in search of more.

Reward research offers a way to read this. In rat experiments, animals with depleted dopamine still enjoyed sweet tastes (Berridge & Robinson, 1998). The authors linked dopamine to “wanting”, not “liking”.

That makes it plausible to keep scrolling without enjoying it. Tivers’s account and Dr. Littman’s account above are both plausible. Nobody has tested either for scrolling.

Jessica McCabe: Stimulation, Not Wasted Time

“Most of us don’t spend hours scrolling because we think it’s a good use of time; we do it because we’re looking for the stimulation we need to function,” explains Jessica McCabe, an ADHD advocate.

This perspective shifts the issue from a moral failing to a coping mechanism. Understanding that you’re seeking stimulation, not “wasting time” on purpose, can help reduce self-blame and point toward solutions.

On this coping view, scrolling is mainly a way to manage feelings: to reduce uncertainty, soothe anxiety or avoid something harder. No study has tested McCabe’s account directly.

A study of news use during lockdown in Norway found that people regulated their exposure. They monitored closely, then deliberately avoided news when overwhelmed (Ytre-Arne & Moe, 2021). Its value is that it removes moral blame.

The Impact of Doomscrolling on ADHD Symptoms

Heightened Anxiety and Emotional Toll

Distressing news can send anxiety soaring.

For someone with ADHD’s sensitive nervous system, doomscrolling is like “adding fuel to a fire that’s already burning pretty hot.”

It amplifies worry, sadness, and anger, often leading to irritability and mood swings. Over time, this can mean exhaustion or hopelessness.

Many people also feel guilty about the time lost to scrolling, which can chip away at self-esteem.

Research in the general population backs the mood link. A 2026 meta-analysis of 21 studies found that doomscrolling goes with more anxiety, depression and psychological distress (Li & Yin, 2026). Certainty was very low, and the data cannot show cause.

Experiments show a quick effect. In two randomised experiments, two to four minutes of COVID news lowered positive mood, while kind news did not (Buchanan et al., 2021).

A 30-day diary of 61 young adults tied daily social media exposure to more depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms (Price et al., 2022). The link was stronger with a history of childhood maltreatment.

No study has compared how ADHD and non-ADHD adults respond to negative feeds. The idea that an ADHD nervous system is more sensitive remains a hypothesis.

Fractured Focus and Productivity

Doomscrolling may leave you craving constant novelty. After a long session, tasks that aren’t as stimulating can be hard to concentrate on.

The evidence is thin. In 528 Thai children, short-form video use went with more parent-rated inattention after adjusting for total screen time (Chiencharoenthanakij et al., 2025). A single survey cannot show cause.

Additionally, every hour spent doomscrolling is an hour not spent on something productive. It becomes a form of procrastination that can lead to missed deadlines and piling work, ultimately creating more stress.

“I spend hours every day just mindlessly thumbing through my phone; my inner monologue is screaming to get up and actually do something, but it’s like a paralysis.”

Sleep Disruption and Fatigue

Doomscrolling often stretches late into the night. The light from your phone screen and the mental stimulation of reading upsetting news can both interfere with sleep.

The next day, you’re exhausted, and we know ADHD symptoms (like concentration and mood) get much worse when you’re tired.

Persistently losing sleep to doomscrolling creates a vicious cycle of daytime fatigue and even more vulnerability to distraction and stress.

Several routes may be at work:

• Screen light: light from a device can delay sleep timing and lower alertness the next morning.
• Mental arousal: upsetting content keeps the mind alert when it should be winding down.
• Lost time: every minute of scrolling is a minute not spent asleep.

Studies cannot yet separate them, and the evidence for each is indirect. Reading on a light-emitting e-reader before bed delayed sleep and lowered next-morning alertness, compared with a printed book (Chang et al., 2015).

A meta-analysis of 20 studies including 125,198 children and adolescents linked bedtime device use to inadequate sleep (odds ratio 2.17) and poor sleep quality (1.46) (Carter et al., 2016).

ADHD may add vulnerability. A meta-analysis of 16 studies found that children diagnosed with ADHD had more sleep difficulties than comparison children (Cortese et al., 2009). That evidence comes from children. No study has tested whether late-night scrolling hits harder.

“Eventually, you’re not even enjoying the activity anymore. You’re emotionally depleted, but your brain is still reaching out for dopamine and the activity you’re doing is still providing it, so you keep going until you’re so depleted you have no energy or emotion left over. Which is when you end up feeling ’empty,’ though people describe it in different ways. Basically, you crash.”

Can Doomscrolling Cause ADHD?

Can doomscrolling or heavy phone use cause ADHD? Nobody has shown that it can. The evidence points to a small, two-way relationship.

A review of screen media studies in young people found a small link with ADHD-related behaviours (Beyens et al., 2018). It called for studies of cause. Studies that follow the same people over time give better evidence.

Ra and colleagues followed 2,587 US adolescents who had no significant ADHD symptoms at the start.

Each extra high-frequency digital media activity went with higher odds of later symptoms (odds ratio 1.11; Ra et al., 2018). The symptoms were self-rated, so they are not diagnoses.

In 543 Dutch adolescents, problematic social media use increased ADHD symptoms over time (Boer et al., 2020). The intensity of use did not.

The problem was loss of control, not hours. Problematic use is sometimes called social media addiction, though that label is debated.

A review of 28 longitudinal studies of children and adolescents found only partial support for effects in both directions, and the effects were small (Thorell et al., 2024). Almost all participants were young, so the evidence for adults is thinner.

Evidence Check: Does the Research Support the ADHD Link?

Verdict: Supported with qualifications.

Doomscrolling goes with poorer mood, and ADHD symptoms go with problematic social media use. Both links are consistent. Cause is weakly shown.

• Mood: Doomscrolling is moderately associated with anxiety, depression and psychological distress, and short exposures lower positive mood. Lasting harm is not established.
• ADHD and Use: ADHD symptoms and problematic social media or internet use are moderately correlated, with partial support for small effects in both directions.
• Stopping Harder: Differences in reward, impulse control and timing are plausible reasons, but this has not been tested in doomscrolling. It is a hypothesis.

A 2026 meta-analysis pooled 21 studies. It found correlations of 0.35 with anxiety, 0.35 with depression and 0.51 with psychological distress (Li & Yin, 2026). Certainty was very low, because the studies were cross-sectional self-reports.

Cause is better tested by experiment. Two randomised online experiments (299 and 603 participants) tested this. Two to four minutes of COVID news lowered positive affect (d about 0.4). Kind news did not (Buchanan et al., 2021).

An earlier experiment found that a negative television bulletin raised anxious and sad mood (Johnston & Davey, 1997).

The experiments show a brief dip in positive feeling, not lasting anxiety or depression. Lasting harm has not been established.

A 2025 meta-analysis of 15 studies with 35,223 participants found a correlation of 0.361 between ADHD symptoms and problematic social media use (Ding et al., 2025). Meta-analyses of internet use found similar links (Augner et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2017).

On direction, a review of 28 longitudinal studies of children and adolescents found partial support for effects in both directions (Thorell et al., 2024). The effects were small.

Problematic use mattered more than hours of use. Two cohorts found that media use came before later ADHD symptoms (Ra et al., 2018; Boer et al., 2020). Almost no participants were adults diagnosed with ADHD, so the evidence for adults is thinner.

Now the third claim, that ADHD makes stopping harder. It rests on neighbouring findings.

A meta-analysis found lower responsiveness in a reward-related brain region, the ventral striatum, when anticipating reward in ADHD (d 0.48 to 0.58) (Plichta & Scheres, 2014). The effect reversed in impulsive people without ADHD.

A meta-analysis of 55 studies found timing differences on tasks lasting seconds (Marx et al., 2022). A study of 112 young adults, none selected for ADHD, found attentional impulsivity the main correlate of problematic social network use (Wegmann et al., 2020). No study has tested doomscrolling in an ADHD sample.

In practice, ADHD traits may well make stopping harder. Hold that as a working theory, not a proven fact. The strategies below are worth trying for the same reason.

Breaking the Cycle: Practical Strategies

The good news is that there are concrete steps you can take to reduce doomscrolling and reclaim your time and mental well-being.

Breaking this habit might feel daunting, but even small changes can make a big difference. Here are several ADHD-friendly strategies to help you escape the doomscrolling vortex:

• Reflect: Notice how scrolling leaves you feeling, and decide how much time it deserves.
• Dopamine Menu: Keep a list of quick, enjoyable activities to try before you scroll.
• Timers and Blockers: Use external limits that do the timekeeping for you.
• Habit Stacking: Attach a different behavior to the moments when you usually scroll.
• Mindful Scrolling: Decide what an app is for, and for how long, before opening it.
• Accountability: Ask someone to support you and talk worries through with them.
• Movement: Use short bursts of activity to reset restlessness.

Consider how doomscrolling makes you feel

Take some time to think about the impact doomscrolling is having on you, both mentally and physically.

List the feelings you get during and after a doomscroll. For example:

• Guilt for wasting time
• Headaches from information overload
• Frustration and sadness from the news

While it is good to want to stay informed about the news, it is also important to have a healthy balance of news input and your own mental well-being.

If doomscrolling is affecting your life or health, decide how much time you want to give it.

Consider: Can you reasonably stay informed if you scroll for a few minutes a day and avoid a lot of the negative impacts of doomscrolling?

Create Dopamine-Friendly Alternatives

Your brain is seeking stimulation, so give it healthier “snacks.”

Make a list of dopamine-rich activities you enjoy. Some experts call it a “dopamine menu”, an informal term for a personal list of quick, enjoyable things to do instead of scrolling.

Keep the list handy. Whenever you feel the itch to scroll, try one of the options first. Quick, fun ones work well:

• Play a 10-minute game
• Do a few jumping jacks
• Sketch or doodle

No trial has tested a dopamine menu. It should work better with activities you enjoy and find absorbing. Skip ones that are merely good for you.

You could make this list into an image that looks like an actual menu using templates on websites such as Canva. Set this image as your phone background so it is easy to see and remind you.

By satisfying your brain’s need for novelty or pleasure in a better way, you’ll curb the urge to seek it from endless scrolling.

Use Timers and App Blockers

Implement external guardrails to compensate for time blindness and impulsivity.

Set a timer before you start browsing (“I’ll scroll for 10 minutes, then stop”). When the alarm goes off, take it as your cue to pause and put the phone down.

Phones and apps can add more structure:

• Daily limits: Use app-blocking tools or built-in screen time limits. Screen time is simply the minutes you spend on screens.
• Lock-outs: Allow only 15 or 30 minutes a day on news or social media apps. Some apps will even lock you out after your limit.
• Quiet hours: Switch off notifications or use “Do Not Disturb”, especially late at night, to avoid pings that lure you back in.

The evidence comes from general samples, not ADHD ones. In a three-week trial, 143 undergraduates limited Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat to 10 minutes per platform per day. They reported less loneliness and depression than usual users (Hunt et al., 2018).

A one-week break from social media also improved well-being in 154 adults (Lambert et al., 2022). Reviews are less clear. Across 21 digital-detox studies, results were mixed (Radtke et al., 2022).

Your phone’s usage log is a better guide to how much time is going than memory, since people’s own estimates are only moderately accurate (Parry et al., 2021).

Habit-Stack & Replace Doomscrolling

Identify when and where you most often doomscroll, and attach a different behavior to those moments.

For example, if you usually scroll in bed at night, leave your phone in another room at bedtime. Listen to calming music or an audiobook instead.

If you tend to scroll during idle moments, keep a book or a fidget toy handy to use at those times. Replacing a habit with a new one is often easier than trying to simply quit it cold turkey.

This is an implementation intention: a specific if-then plan. For example, “If I am in bed, then the phone stays in the kitchen.”

A meta-analysis of 94 tests found a medium-to-large effect on goal attainment (d = 0.65) (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006). In ADHD children, if-then plans also improved response inhibition on a laboratory task (Gawrilow & Gollwitzer, 2008).

Habits take time. In one study, new daily habits took anywhere from 18 to 254 days to feel automatic (Lally et al., 2010).

Mindful Scrolling vs. Mindless Scrolling

Practice being intentional with your online time instead of automatic.

Before you open an app, decide what you’re there for and about how long you’ll spend. For example, you might tell yourself, “I’ll check the news for 5 minutes” or “I’m going on Instagram to see my friends’ updates.”

Stick to that plan. If you find yourself scrolling without a clear purpose, pause and close the app. By turning each session into a conscious choice, you’ll be less likely to fall down a rabbit hole by accident.

This might take some practice to consciously notice so don’t feel disheartened if you fall back into old habits at first.

Buddy System and Accountability

Breaking habits can be easier with support. Tell a friend or family member about your goal to stop doomscrolling – ask them to help keep you accountable.

For instance, you might agree to update each other on your progress, or have them gently remind you if they notice you scrolling excessively. Someone rooting for you can keep you on track.

If world events are triggering your urge to scroll, try talking about those worries with a friend or in a support group. Getting reassurance and validation from a person can reduce the need to seek relief from endless news updates.

Online communities can help too.

According to an interview study of 20 adults diagnosed with ADHD, large ADHD Facebook groups worked as safe spaces that reduced isolation (Isser & Gazit, 2026).

One participant, a 27-year-old woman, described joining a group in the year after her diagnosis and getting “hooked”. She went on to join every group she could find, because reading about others’ experiences let her recognise herself again and again.

Time online is not always a problem. It can meet real needs.

Healthy Stimulation and Exercise

Physical movement can burn off excess restlessness and provide the brain with a healthy dose of dopamine.

When you feel the urge to doomscroll, try doing a quick exercise – stand up and stretch, do a few jumping jacks, or take a short walk.

Even brief activity can reset your mind and reduce the craving for digital stimulation.

Exercise also benefits young ADHDers. Meta-analyses of randomised trials found benefits for attention, hyperactivity, impulsivity and executive function (Cerrillo-Urbina et al., 2015; Vysniauske et al., 2020). No study has tested whether movement cuts the urge to scroll, so treat this as a sensible experiment.

Evidence for Each Strategy

No trial has tested any of these strategies for doomscrolling in ADHDers. The table shows what the closest evidence says.

Strategy	What the closest evidence shows	Tested in ADHD?
Limits, timers and blockers	Randomised trials in general samples improved well-being (Hunt et al., 2018; Lambert et al., 2022). A review of digital-detox studies found mixed results (Radtke et al., 2022).	No trial in ADHDers
If-then plans and habit swaps	Medium-to-large effect on goal attainment across 94 tests (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006).	ADHD children only, in a laboratory task (Gawrilow & Gollwitzer, 2008)
Dopamine menu	No trial found. It should work better if the activities are ones you enjoy.	No
Mindful scrolling	Correlational only. Mindfulness and secondary traumatic stress together explained the link between doomscrolling and well-being in 400 Turkish adults (Taskin et al., 2024).	No
Accountability and peer support	No trial found. Interviews with 20 adults diagnosed with ADHD describe online groups as a source of belonging (Isser & Gazit, 2026).	Qualitative only
Exercise	Meta-analyses show short-term benefits in young ADHDers (Cerrillo-Urbina et al., 2015; Vysniauske et al., 2020).	Not for scrolling

Staying informed matters too. When people deactivated Facebook for four weeks, well-being rose but factual news knowledge fell (Allcott et al., 2020). The aim is a balance, not zero news.

Self-Compassion and ADHD

Be kind to yourself. Treating doomscrolling as a moral failing or a sign of laziness adds shame without helping.

Recognize that doomscrolling often starts as a coping mechanism. It helps people deal with boredom, anxiety, or feeling overwhelmed.

It’s not a personal failure; it’s your brain trying to self-soothe or seek stimulation. Rather than thinking “I’m just lazy” or “I have no willpower,” reframe it as, “My brain was seeking comfort or stimulation, and I can find better ways to give it that.”

Practice self-compassion by understanding that this habit formed for a reason and that changing it will take time. If you slip up, three habits help:

• Skip the self-criticism: If you spend an hour doomscrolling, resist the urge to beat yourself up.
• Note the trigger: Gently ask what set it off (“I was stressed and wanted to escape for a bit”), then use that insight to adjust next time.
• Credit small wins: If you cut down your scrolling time or avoided it during a tempting moment, give yourself credit.

No study has yet tested whether self-compassion changes scrolling. The advice rests on the coping view of the habit, which is plausible but only indirectly supported.

Remember, you’re not alone in this struggle. ADHD is neurological, and needing different strategies or extra support is nothing to be ashamed of.

If scrolling regularly costs you sleep, work, mood or relationships, raise it with a doctor or therapist. The same goes for persistent anxiety or low mood. ADHD, anxiety and depression are common, treatable and often co-occur.

References

Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020). The welfare effects of social media. American Economic Review, 110(3), 629–676. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190658

Augner, C., Vlasak, T., & Barth, A. (2023). The relationship between problematic internet use and attention deficit, hyperactivity and impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 168, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.10.032

Barkley, R. A. (2023, May 22). Life course outcomes of ADHD – Part 4 – Psychiatric, social, sexual, & economic [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CF1XcqN8pwE

Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: Hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Research Reviews, 28(3), 309–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00019-8

Beyens, I., Valkenburg, P. M., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2018). Screen media use and ADHD-related behaviors: Four decades of research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(40), 9875–9881. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611611114

Boer, M., Stevens, G., Finkenauer, C., & van den Eijnden, R. (2020). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-symptoms, social media use intensity, and social media use problems in adolescents: Investigating directionality. Child Development, 91(4), e853–e865. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13334

Buchanan, K., Aknin, L. B., Lotun, S., & Sandstrom, G. M. (2021). Brief exposure to social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: Doom-scrolling has negative emotional consequences, but kindness-scrolling does not. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0257728. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257728

Carter, B., Rees, P., Hale, L., Bhattacharjee, D., & Paradkar, M. S. (2016). Association between portable screen-based media device access or use and sleep outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 170(12), 1202–1208. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2341

Cerrillo-Urbina, A. J., García-Hermoso, A., Sánchez-López, M., Pardo-Guijarro, M. J., Santos Gómez, J. L., & Martínez-Vizcaíno, V. (2015). The effects of physical exercise in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(6), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12255

Chang, A.-M., Aeschbach, D., Duffy, J. F., & Czeisler, C. A. (2015). Evening use of light-emitting eReaders negatively affects sleep, circadian timing, and next-morning alertness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(4), 1232–1237. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418490112

Chiencharoenthanakij, R., Yothamart, K., Chantathamma, N., Sukhumdecha, W., Charoensri, S., Thanyakulsajja, B., & Anuroj, K. (2025). Short-form video media use is associated with greater inattentive symptoms in Thai school-age children: Insights from a cross-sectional survey. Brain and Behavior, 15(7), e70656. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70656

Cortese, S., Faraone, S. V., Konofal, E., & Lecendreux, M. (2009). Sleep in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Meta-analysis of subjective and objective studies. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(9), 894–908. https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181ac09c9

Ding, J., Liu, Z., & Chao, M. (2025). The association between problematic social media use and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptomatology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 189, 544–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.07.009

Gawrilow, C., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Implementation intentions facilitate response inhibition in children with ADHD. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-007-9150-1

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1

Hunt, M. G., Marx, R., Lipson, C., & Young, J. (2018). No more FOMO: Limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(10), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2018.37.10.751

Isser, M., & Gazit, T. (2026). Scrolling for support: Informational, emotional, and social support in adult ADHD Facebook groups. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, Article 1755437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1755437

Johnston, W. M., & Davey, G. C. L. (1997). The psychological impact of negative TV news bulletins: The catastrophizing of personal worries. British Journal of Psychology, 88(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02622.x

Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Potts, H. W. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.674

Lambert, J., Barnstable, G., Minter, E., Cooper, J., & McEwan, D. (2022). Taking a one-week break from social media improves well-being, depression, and anxiety: A randomized controlled trial. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(5), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0324

Li, Q., & Yin, X. (2026). Doomscrolling, mental health, and psychological well-being in adolescents and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1893800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1893800

Marx, I., Cortese, S., Koelch, M. G., & Hacker, T. (2022). Meta-analysis: Altered perceptual timing abilities in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 61(7), 866–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2021.12.004

Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.345

Montag, C., Lachmann, B., Herrlich, M., & Zweig, K. (2019). Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2612. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142612

Parry, D. A., Davidson, B. I., Sewall, C. J. R., Fisher, J. T., Mieczkowski, H., & Quintana, D. S. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(11), 1535–1547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01117-5

Plichta, M. M., & Scheres, A. (2014). Ventral-striatal responsiveness during reward anticipation in ADHD and its relation to trait impulsivity in the healthy population: A meta-analytic review of the fMRI literature. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 38, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.012

Price, M., Legrand, A. C., Brier, Z. M. F., van Stolk-Cooke, K., Peck, K., Dodds, P. S., Danforth, C. M., & Adams, Z. W. (2022). Doomscrolling during COVID-19: The negative association between daily social and traditional media consumption and mental health symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 14(8), 1338–1346. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001202

Ra, C. K., Cho, J., Stone, M. D., De La Cerda, J., Goldenson, N. I., Moroney, E., Tung, I., Lee, S. S., & Leventhal, A. M. (2018). Association of digital media use with subsequent symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among adolescents. JAMA, 320(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.8931

Radtke, T., Apel, T., Schenkel, K., Keller, J., & von Lindern, E. (2022). Digital detox: An effective solution in the smartphone era? A systematic literature review. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 190–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211028647

Soroka, S., Fournier, P., & Nir, L. (2019). Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(38), 18888–18892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116

Taskin, S., Yildirim Kurtulus, H., Satici, S. A., & Deniz, M. E. (2024). Doomscrolling and mental well-being in social media users: A serial mediation through mindfulness and secondary traumatic stress. Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.23111

Thorell, L. B., Burén, J., Ström Wiman, J., Sandberg, D., & Nutley, S. B. (2024). Longitudinal associations between digital media use and ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 33(8), 2503–2526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02130-3

Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Kollins, S. H., Wigal, T. L., Newcorn, J. H., Telang, F., Fowler, J. S., Zhu, W., Logan, J., Ma, Y., Pradhan, K., Wong, C., & Swanson, J. M. (2009). Evaluating dopamine reward pathway in ADHD: Clinical implications. JAMA, 302(10), 1084–1091. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1308

Vysniauske, R., Verburgh, L., Oosterlaan, J., & Molendijk, M. L. (2020). The effects of physical exercise on functional outcomes in the treatment of ADHD: A meta-analysis. Journal of Attention Disorders, 24(5), 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054715627489

Wang, B.-Q., Yao, N.-Q., Zhou, X., Liu, J., & Lv, Z.-T. (2017). The association between attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and internet addiction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 17, Article 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1408-x

Wegmann, E., Müller, S. M., Turel, O., & Brand, M. (2020). Interactions of impulsivity, general executive functions, and specific inhibitory control explain symptoms of social-networks-use disorder: An experimental study. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 3866. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60819-4

Ytre-Arne, B., & Moe, H. (2021). Doomscrolling, monitoring and avoiding: News use in COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Journalism Studies, 22(13), 1739–1755. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1952475