11 Cognitive Distortions Identified in CBT

By Olivia Guy-Evans, published March 01, 2022

Fact checked by Saul Mcleod, PhD

---

Overgeneralization

With this type of cognitive distortion, this involves making broad negative conclusions that are far beyond what the situation indicates. A person may take one instance that happened in either the past or present and impose this onto all current or future situations. 

Someone may have started a new job and had an awkward first interaction with their co-worker. Someone who overgeneralizes may take this one interaction and believe that because of this, they will be terrible at the job as a whole. They will irrationally believe broad conclusions at now being able to succeed based on one negative interaction.

With overgeneralization, words like ‘always’, ‘never’, ‘everything’, and ‘nothing’ as frequently used in trains of thought.

For instance, a person who overgeneralizes may say ‘I never accomplish anything’, ‘everyone hates me’, or ‘I always clean up after you’. If the individual took a step back and analyzed the evidence, they may find that these broad statements are far from the truth.

These thoughts may arise from a sense of learned helplessness, depression, or anxiety disorders.

Making generalized and global conclusions on the basis of only little evidence can leave someone thinking that things are uncontrollable, inevitable, and out of control.

If this cognitive distortion ruminates, it could leave people feeling frustrated, discouraged, depressed, and annoyed. 

Mental Filters

This thinking style involves a ‘filtering in’ and ‘filtering out’ process, similar to tunnel vision. This involves a disproportionate amount of attention being given to small, negative details instead of seeing the larger picture, which often has more positive details.

All the positive aspects of a situation get ignored or are distorted due what may be a single negative detail. A good way to think of this is as if someone is looking at the world through dirty glasses, and not seeing the whole picture. 

An example of this cognitive distortion is to imagine going out for a romantic meal with a partner. You may be having a really nice time together, but at the end of the dinner, you have a disagreement about how much of a tip to leave.

If using mental filters, you may stew on this disagreement for the rest of the evening. Although the rest of the evening may have been a positive experience, you may focus solely on the one negative thing that happened and exclude all other details that were enjoyable.

This means you may not remember the night as pleasant when looking back on it, instead you may keep experiencing the negative feelings associated with that event. 

People may be more likely to remember negative parts of events, especially when feeling depressed.

If someone continues to dwell on all the negative details in every situation, this could make someone feel more depressed. This distortion can also contribute to problems including anxiety, poor self-belief, and interpersonal problems. 

Discounting The Positive

This cognitive distortion is similar to mental filtering, the difference is that the positive aspects of a situation are dismissed as something of little value. This is common for people who are depressed in that they may only focus on the negatives of a situation and not give themselves credit for the positives. 

They will usually explain away or have reasons for why they achieved something. For instance, when they passed an exam, they may say ‘it was an easy exam’ or ‘it’s something I should have known anyway so it doesn’t matter’.

Another example is if someone compliments the way you look and you dismiss it as them only ‘being polite’, or if you do well in a job interview, you may think this is because they didn’t realize that you’re not that good yet. 

People who have low self-esteem tend to use this cognitive distortion. This distortion is unhelpful as people may never feel proud of their accomplishments, can have a lower sense of self, or may push themselves to do better, beyond what is realistically achievable.

Jumping To Conclusions

Although there are times when we can have gut feelings which turn out to be right, there are times when we are not right. People who jump to conclusions do so in two ways.

They can do this when they assume they know what someone else is thinking (mind reading) and when they make predictions about what is going to happen in the future (predictive thinking).

These conclusions are usually negative to the individual, rather than positive conclusions. 

Mindreading 

Mindreading involves the belief in knowing what others are thinking, instead of considering more likely possibilities. Those who mindread tend to assume that they know what someone else is thinking or that they know the rationale behind someone else’s behavior.

For example, when spending time with a friend, they check their phone when you are talking to them. Someone who mindreads may think ‘they must think I am boring’, whereas a more likely explanation could be that the friend is expecting an important phone call.

Another example is if your boss asks to see you in their office. You may think ‘They must be mad at me. I am going to get fired’, when there are countless other explanations that may be more likely. 

Predictive Thinking

People can also jump to conclusions when they start making predictions about what is going to happen on some future occasion, called predictive thinking.

These are predictions where someone overestimates the negative emotions or experiences that are going to be encountered. For instance, when about to give a presentation for an assignment, you may have thoughts such as ‘I will mess up’, ‘my voice will be shaky’, ‘I will do terribly’.

You may have succeeded at doing something many times before, but despite this, you may still predict things will go wrong.

This type of thinking is very common for people with generalized anxiety and social anxiety disorder, and it is a way to increase anxiety and stress further.

People with anxiety disorders may be more likely to avoid situations where they predict something bad will happen, which in turn makes it harder for them to overcome their anxiety. 

Magnification

This type of cognitive distortion involves unreasonably magnifying the negatives and unreasonably minimising the positives. This is similar to discounting the positive, but instead of dismissing the positive attributes, they are minimized in themselves, but magnified in other people.

Likewise, the negative attributes in themselves are magnified, but minimized in others. People may often explain away their own positive characteristics or achievements as if they are not important.

This distortion can be thought of as looking through the world through either end of the same pair of binoculars. 

An example of minimisation is if you got a promotion at work, you may think ‘I was just lucky’. Or if you pass an exam you might believe ‘it didn’t count, it wasn’t important’.

An example of magnification is if you made a mistake on a work assignment, you may think ‘this is terrible’ or ‘I have failed at my job’. 

Disqualifying one’s own attributes or achievements can have negative effects such as lowering feelings of self-worth and sense of self. This type of thinking can also affect behavior in a variety of ways.

It can contribute to feelings of anxiety, fear, and panic, because it causes people to exaggerate the important of insignificant events. 

People often believe that other people notice and judge their small mistakes, when in reality, other people are probably more concerned with their own errors.

At the same time, they will minimize their own ability to cope with feelings of stress and anxiety, which can then contribute to increased anxiety and avoidance of many situations. 

Emotional Reasoning

This cognitive distortion involves believing something to be true because the person feels that it is true. This is basing views of situation, oneself, or others, on the way the person feels about them.

They will usually ignore or discount any evidence that doesn’t support their conclusion, the only evidence that something bad will happen is that they feel like something bad will happen. 

People may experience emotional reasoning when they feel anxious about something. They may have a feeling that things will not work out, despite any evidence of this being true.

People who use emotional reasoning tend to take their emotions as being evidence of the truth. This thinking can contribute to a number of problems including feelings of anxiety and depression.

Whilst this distortion is common in those who have anxiety or depression, it’s thought that emotional reasoning is a very common way of thinking that many people engage in.

‘Should’ And ‘Must’ Statements

‘Should’ and ‘must’ statements create precise and fixed ideas of how others should behave, and overestimate how bad it is when these behavioral expectations are not met.

It is not necessarily unhelpful to have some shoulding and musting statements, such as ‘I should get to work on time’ or ‘I shouldn’t drink alcohol and drive home’. These statements only become unhelpful when they put unreasonable demands or pressure on yourself and others. 

Some example statements which are unhelpful include ‘I should always get things right’, ‘I must be the best’, ‘they should know better than that’.

Someone who repeatedly uses these kinds of statements may feel guilt or disappointed in themselves. Likewise, they may leave someone feeling frustrated, angry, or disappointed in others, resulting in interpersonal issues.

Labeling

This type of cognitive distortion involves assigning labels to the self, others, and the world. These are often negative labels which make global statements based on behavior in specific situations.

People may use negative labels even thought there are many more examples that aren’t consistent with that label. 

For example, you may knock over a hot drink onto the carpet and say, ‘I am such an idiot’. Or, if a friend appears to ignore you when you pass them in the street, you may think ‘they are inconsiderate’. 

These labels essentially generalize about people and ignores all the other positive characteristics and actions. When stepping back from the situation, you may realize that one action does not define someone.

The friend you saw on the street may have had a lot on their mind and truly did not see you. Labeling people in this way based on only one situation, can result in interpersonal issues. Likewise, labeling the self in a negative way can impact on self-esteem and self-worth. 

Personalization and Blame

Personalization and blame involve beliefs that others are behaving negatively because of them, without giving any consideration for more likely explanations for this behavior. They make take other’s behaviors personally and take total responsibility for external events occurring. 

The person may take 100% of the responsibility for the occurrence of external events, usually when something hasn’t gone quite as wanted or expected.

People can blame themselves for everything that goes wrong or could go wrong, even when they may only be partly responsible or not responsible at all. 

Example statements of this cognitive distortion are ‘this is all my fault’ and ‘I’m to blame’. Carrying all the responsibility for something that the person probably had little control over is a large burden and one that’s likely to leave them feeling discouraged or overwhelmed.

Personalization and blaming are found to be common for people who have experienced trauma or have been in abusive relationships. People who have depressive or anxiety disorders are also likely to blame themselves for external events. 

Catastrophizing 

Catastrophizing is also thought of as making mountains out of molehills. When something negative happens, no matter how small, a person who catastrophizes blows the situation out of proportion and will view the situation as terrible or dreadful, even though the reality is that the problem itself is quite small. 

An example of catastrophizing thinking could occur when you are home alone at night, and you hear a noise which startles you.

You may think, ‘someone has broken into my house, they are going to kill me’. Another example is if you wake up feeling depressed in the morning and think ‘what if I always stay depressed?’

These thoughts can relate to other cognitive distortions such as predictive thinking and jumping to conclusion. Even thought the reality of the problem itself may be small, when someone catastrophizes, things can get very big very quickly and an individual may get themselves to a point where it all seems out of control.

People with generalized anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, and social anxiety often experience this thinking where they believe things are going to be a lot worse than they really are. 

Black And White Thinking

This is also known as all-or-nothing thinking as people who use this distortion tend to see only one extreme or the other. They may view things as either right or wrong and good or bad, without seeing the shades of grey in-between. 

An instance of this is if a student does not achieve straight As in all of their classes, they may believe they are a failure. They may think ‘If I am not the best at what I do then I am worthless.

This type of thinking is very unhelpful as it can lead to extremely unrealistic standards, you’re the self and others, and can affect motivation and relationships.

It can also set you up for failure if you quit something that you think you will not be perfect at. This type of polarized thinking can also make people miss the complexity of most people and situations. 

Benefits of CBT

CBT is globally recognized as one of the most successful and broadly applicable therapeutic approaches. This type of therapy is based on the cognitive model of emotional response.

This model tells us that our feelings and behaviors stem from our thoughts, as opposed to external stimuli. CBT is goal-orientated and problem-focused, unlike other therapies such as psychoanalysis.

As a result, CBT focus on the present, rather than on a lengthy analysis of the individual’s history. 

CBT is known for its quick results, the number of sessions depending on the needs of the client, but usually range between 5 to 20 sessions. In comparison, other kinds of therapy may take months or even years of regular sessions in order to see results. 

The cognitive distortions are often discussed in CBT so that the clients can identify their negative thought patterns. Once identified, together with the therapist, the individual learns to approach situations with more realistic thinking, rather than reaching for those negative automatic thoughts.

The goal of CBT is to teach people that while they cannot control every aspect of the world around them, they can take control of how they interpret and deal with situations. 

CBT allows the individual to engage in healthier thinking patterns by becoming more aware of their thoughts which affect their mood and feelings. There are usually homework assignments for the client to complete outside of therapy sessions.

These allow the individual to apply what they have learnt to situations which may arise and builds their confidence to cope with these situations. In this way, the client is accountable for their therapeutic outcomes. 

Research into CBT have consistently found effectiveness in treating different mental health conditions, as well as finding that the relapse rate for these individuals is significantly lower compared to medicative treatments, especially for those with depression (DeRubeis et al., 2008).

A meta-analysis in 2012 reviewed CBT’s efficacy in treating a variety of conditions. The researcher’s findings revealed overwhelming support for CBT as an effective therapeutic treatment option for conditions such as anxiety disorders, personality disorders, depression and bipolar disorders, eating disorders, anger control problems, and general stress (Hofmann et al., 2012).

Likewise, other meta-analyses have found that CBT helped to improve the symptoms of people with anxiety and anxiety-related disorders including obsessive compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder (Carpenter et al., 2018).

APA Style References

Carpenter, J. K., Andrews, L. A., Witcraft, S. M., Powers, M. B., Smits, J. A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta‐analysis of randomized placebo‐controlled trials. Depression and anxiety, 35(6), 502-514.

DeRubeis, R. J., Siegle, G. J., & Hollon, S. D. (2008). Cognitive therapy versus medication for depression: treatment outcomes and neural mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(10), 788-796.

Hartney, E. (2021, November 13). 10 Cognitive Distortions Identified in CBT. Very Well Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/ten-cognitive-distortions-identified-in-cbt-22412

Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive therapy and research, 36(5), 427-440.

Nathan, P., Rees, C., Lim, L., & Correia, H. (2003). Back from the Bluez. Perth, Western Australia: Centre for Clinical Interventions 

Riopel, L. (2021, December 12). 8 Benefits of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Positive Psychology. https://positivepsychology.com/benefits-of-cbt/ 

Silva Casabianca, S. (2021, May 6). Stuck in the Negatives? 15 Cognitive Distortions To Blame. PsychCentral. https://psychcentral.com/lib/cognitive-distortions-negative-thinking#definition 

Stanborough, R. J. (2019, December 18). What Are Cognitive Distortions and How Can You Change These Thinking Patterns? Healthline. https://www.healthline.com/health/cognitive-distortions