Cultural Transmission Theory

Cultural transmission theory explains how ideas, values, and behaviours pass from one generation to the next through learning and imitation, not through genes. It shows how culture evolves as people share traditions, teach social norms, and adapt. In short, it studies how culture is inherited.

How Culture Is Passed On: Three Main Pathways

Cultural transmission is the process that keeps a society’s culture (its shared knowledge, values, customs, and beliefs) alive across generations.

It also allows that culture to adapt and change as people face new realities.

This process is closely linked to socialization, the way people learn how to behave and what to believe within their culture. Together, they explain how societies stay stable while still evolving.

Through socialisation, people learn who they are, how to live in their society, and what’s expected of them.

Sociologists describe three main ways that this cultural learning happens:

---

1. Vertical Transmission: From Parents to Children

Vertical transmission happens when culture is passed directly from parents to their children.

This usually takes place within the family, which sociologists see as the most important agent of socialisation.

The Family’s Role

The family is where early learning takes place, long before a child starts school. Parents, siblings, and extended family members teach both practical skills and social values:

1. Learning Everyday Life: Families show children how to use everyday objects like clothes, tools, or eating utensils, and teach them cultural traditions such as holidays or table manners.

2. Moral and Social Rules: Parents pass on their ideas about right and wrong, fairness, respect, and how to behave with others.

3. Gender Roles: Families are also a key influence on how children learn what it means to be “male” or “female” in their culture. For example, boys may be praised for being assertive or adventurous, while girls may be encouraged to be caring or tidy. 

4. Learning by Watching: Children often imitate the adults around them, copying actions and attitudes through play (like pretending to be “mum” or “dad”). Parents act as role models, using praise or discipline to shape behaviour.

5. Passing on Social Class: Families also pass on values and expectations linked to their social position. For example, working-class families might emphasise obedience and respect for authority, while middle-class families may focus on independence and creativity. This helps reproduce the social class system from one generation to the next, a process sociologists call social reproduction.

6. Active Children: Some sociologists, especially interpretivists, argue that children aren’t just passive learners. They play an active role in socialisation: they question, influence, and even change their parents’ behaviour (sometimes called “pester power”).

Why Parental Values Don’t Always Stick

Grusec and Goodnow (1994) asked why children so often reject the values their parents try to instil, even in warm, well-functioning families.

The model reframed decades of discipline research around a testable two-stage account. A synthesis is only as strong as its sources. These were largely correlational and drawn disproportionately from White, Western, middle-class families.

Acceptance is also hard to measure independently of the outcomes it is meant to predict.

---

2. Horizontal Transmission: Among Peers

Horizontal transmission refers to cultural learning between people of the same generation, for example, between friends, classmates, or co-workers.

Peer groups play a major role, especially during childhood and adolescence, when people begin to form an identity separate from their family.

The Role of Peer Groups

1. Building Independence: Peer groups allow young people to test out new roles, express individuality, and learn how to fit in socially.

2. Shared Norms and Behaviour: Within peer groups, individuals learn what is considered “cool” or acceptable, from how to dress or speak to what music to like. These group norms can differ from those of parents or teachers.

3. Learning Deviance: According to Differential Association Theory (Sutherland), deviant or criminal behaviour is also learned socially, often through close friendships. If someone spends more time with peers who break the rules, they are more likely to adopt those behaviours and values themselves.

---

3. Oblique Transmission: Across Generations (Unrelated Individuals)

Oblique transmission occurs when people learn from older individuals who are not family members, such as teachers, coaches, or media figures.

This type of learning usually happens through formal institutions (like schools and workplaces) and informal ones (like the media or online communities).

The Role of Schools, Workplaces, and Media

1. Formal Education: Schools pass on both knowledge (like reading or history) and values (like respect, punctuality, and teamwork). This is sometimes called the transmission of culture, as education helps keep society functioning by teaching shared norms.

2. Hidden Curriculum: Beyond official lessons, schools also teach unspoken social rules, such as obedience, discipline, and competition.

3. Cultural Capital: Success in school often depends on cultural capital: knowledge, language, or behaviour that match the dominant culture’s expectations. This helps reproduce social class differences.

4. Workplace Learning: In workplaces, people are socialised into both formal rules (like dress codes and professional standards) and informal practices (like office culture or humour). Bosses, mentors, and colleagues all play a part in this cultural learning.

5. Media Influence: The mass media, including television, films, and social media, has become a powerful agent of socialisation. It offers role models and spreads cultural norms on a global scale.

---

Early Foundations in Sociology

The roots of cultural transmission go back to the European founders of sociology. They were trying to understand how societies stay together and why they change.

Émile Durkheim (1858–1917) – The Functionalist View

Durkheim, often called one of the founders of sociology, argued that shared beliefs and values hold people together. He called this the collective conscience.

• He believed socialisation (the teaching and learning of culture) was essential for creating social solidarity, the feeling of unity that binds people into a community.

• Schools, in particular, play a key role in this process by teaching moral values and the “social facts” that guide acceptable behaviour.

• Durkheim saw socialisation as society’s way of maintaining order and stability.

In short, Durkheim viewed cultural transmission as the glue that keeps societies functioning smoothly.

---

Max Weber (1864–1920) – Understanding Meaning

Weber focused on how culture shapes human action.

He believed that understanding society means understanding the meanings people attach to their behaviour. He called this method verstehen (German for “understanding”).

• Weber highlighted that people’s actions are influenced by values, religion, and beliefs, not just by economics or biology.

• This helped shift sociology toward studying subjective meanings, or how individuals interpret their world.

Weber’s ideas paved the way for modern interpretive sociology, which sees cultural transmission as an active process of meaning-making.

---

Karl Marx (1818–1883) – Culture and Inequality

Marx, known as the founder of modern communism, saw culture in a different light. He argued that cultural ideas often serve the interests of the powerful.

• According to conflict theory, culture and socialisation can reproduce inequality.

• The ruling class uses ideology (shared beliefs and values) to justify their power and maintain control over workers.

• For example, the belief that success is always the result of “hard work” can hide structural inequalities in society.

Marx’s perspective reframed cultural transmission. It was not only a stabilising force but also a way inequality is passed from one generation to the next.

---

The Role of Anthropology

While sociologists studied the structure of societies, anthropologists focused on culture itself: the patterns of behaviour, belief, and knowledge that define human groups.

• Anthropologist George Murdock (1949) identified cultural universals: customs found in all societies, such as language, family systems, and humour.

• Bronislaw Malinowski (1922) argued that culture meets human needs: biological (like food and shelter), practical (like laws), and social (like belonging). His work helped shape functionalism, the view that every part of society has a purpose.

• Margaret Mead (1935, 1950) showed that gender roles are culturally created, not biologically fixed. Her studies of preindustrial societies demonstrated that what is considered “masculine” or “feminine” varies greatly across cultures.

Anthropologists made it clear that culture is learned, not inherited. This is a key idea shared by sociologists studying socialisation.

---

The Psychological Dimension

Cultural transmission is also a focus in psychology, where researchers have explored how individuals learn from others through observation, interaction, and communication.

Lev Vygotsky (1896–1934) – Sociocultural Theory

Vygotsky, a Russian psychologist, emphasised that human development depends on social interaction and the use of cultural tools, especially language.

• He argued that children learn through guided interaction with others, including imitation, instruction, and collaboration.

• Because cultures provide different tools and practices, learning and thinking vary widely across societies.

Vygotsky’s theory links culture directly to cognitive development, showing that learning is always social and cultural, not just individual.

---

Albert Bandura (1925–2021) – Social Cognitive Theory

Bandura’s work explained how people learn through observation: by watching others and modelling their behaviour.

• This process, known as observational learning, happens both face-to-face and through media.

• Bandura showed that repeated exposure to certain behaviours, such as aggression on television, can influence how people think and act.

His ideas extended cultural transmission to the modern world of mass media and social learning.

The Bobo Doll Experiment

The Bobo doll experiment by Bandura, Ross, and Ross (1961) is the classic test of whether culture can be transmitted by observation alone.

The study is foundational, but its limits are well known. The Bobo doll rights itself when knocked down, so children may have shown play suited to the object rather than a general urge to hurt people.

The laboratory also invites demand characteristics, meaning cues that signal what behaviour is expected. Children may have inferred that hitting the doll was sanctioned because an adult had just done so. The study also measured immediate imitation, not lasting enculturation.

Even so, the core finding has been broadly replicated. Watching a model is enough to transmit a new behaviour.

---

Edwin Sutherland (1939) – Differential Association Theory

Sutherland applied the idea of cultural transmission to crime and deviance.

• He argued that criminal behaviour is learned, not inherited.

• People learn values and techniques for crime through interaction with others, especially within close peer groups or communities.

• Drawing on the Chicago School of sociology, he showed that deviant values can pass between generations in disorganised neighbourhoods, just like any other cultural norm.

This idea helped bridge sociology, psychology, and criminology under the shared theme of learned behaviour.

---

Symbolic Interactionism 

In early 20th-century America, sociologists such as George Herbert Mead and Herbert Blumer developed Symbolic Interactionism, which focuses on the small-scale, everyday transmission of culture.

• People create and share meanings through language and symbols, for example handshakes, greetings, or uniforms.

• Through social interaction, individuals learn how to see themselves and how others see them, forming a self-concept or identity.

• Culture, in this view, is constantly being made and remade as people interact.

Symbolic interactionism shifted attention from large institutions to everyday life. Cultural transmission happens not just through schools or families but in every conversation and shared experience.

---

Cultural Evolution and Dual Inheritance Theory

The three pathways come from an attempt to model culture with the mathematical tools of population genetics. That work led to dual inheritance theory, which treats culture as a second inheritance system alongside genes.

Transmission Models and Biases

Cavalli-Sforza and Feldman (1981) modelled culture with the mathematics population geneticists use for genes. Their models tracked traits moving down a family line (vertical), across a generation (horizontal), or from unrelated elders (oblique).

The pattern of transmission matters as well as the content.

Horizontal and oblique transmission can spread a trait through a population far faster than vertical transmission alone. This is one reason peer culture and mass media can shift norms within a single generation.

Boyd and Richerson (1985) extended this into dual inheritance theory.

Also called gene–culture coevolution, it holds that humans have two interacting inheritance systems, one genetic and one cultural. Culture is subject to variation, selection, and drift, even though it runs on a non-biological channel.

Their key contribution was to identify transmission biases that shape which ideas spread, beyond simple exposure:

• Content bias: some ideas are copied more often because they are memorable, useful, or attention-grabbing.
• Conformist bias: people disproportionately copy the most common variant in their group. This stabilises norms and can make cultures diverge sharply.
• Prestige bias: people preferentially copy successful, high-status, or admired models. This is one mechanism behind celebrity and influencer effects on fashion and behaviour.

People do not simply copy whoever they meet. Some models and ideas are copied far more than others, in patterned and predictable ways.

Cultural Evolution as a Science

Mesoudi (2011) argued for treating cultural evolution as one unified science. It integrates anthropology, psychology, and evolutionary biology around a shared claim. Norms, values, technologies, and beliefs undergo three population-level processes:

• Variation: new variants arise through individual or social learning, invention, or error.
• Selection: some variants are copied, retained, and taught more than others because of the biases above.
• Transmission: variants pass along the vertical, horizontal, and oblique pathways described earlier.

The process resembles biological natural selection, with one key difference. Cultural “mutations” can be directed, since a person can deliberately improve on what they were taught.

This reframes Durkheim’s collective conscience and Marx’s ideology.

They look less like fixed blocks of shared belief and more like populations of competing cultural variants. Some persist because they serve group cohesion or elite interests. Others persist because they are easier to learn, remember, or perform.

Enculturation and Acculturation

Enculturation is the process by which a person absorbs the culture they are born into as part of ordinary development.

It is vertical, horizontal, and oblique transmission described from the individual’s side.

Acculturation is different. It is the process of adapting to a second, host culture, most often studied in migrants and their children. They must keep elements of their culture of origin while acquiring elements of the new one, sometimes in tension.

Cultural transmission theory explains reproduction within a culture. Acculturation research asks what happens when contact with a second cultural system disrupts it.

The distinction has practical stakes for services supporting migrant families. These families often navigate the transmission of a home culture at home and of a host culture through school and peers. Support services increasingly try to ease that tension rather than resolve it in favour of one culture.

---

Cultural Continuity and Adaptation

Cultural transmission performs two crucial roles:

It maintains stability by preserving shared traditions and values, and it allows change by enabling societies to develop, innovate, and adapt to new circumstances.

This dual process ensures that while societies hold on to their identity, they also evolve with the times.

---

1. Keeping Culture Stable

Culture includes the shared knowledge, language, customs, values, beliefs, and material objects passed from one generation to another.

Without the deliberate teaching and learning of these cultural elements, society could not function. There would be no shared framework to unite people or guide behaviour.

Shared Values and Social Order

Cultural transmission provides the foundation for social order by ensuring that people internalise the values, norms, and beliefs that hold society together.

• Value Consensus: According to Functionalist sociologists like Émile Durkheim and Talcott Parsons, societies remain stable because most members share a common understanding of what is right and wrong. This shared moral framework, known as value consensus, forms the moral glue that binds individuals into a functioning social system.

• Social Integration: When people agree on fundamental values (e.g., honesty, hard work, respect for others), they can live together cooperatively. This promotes social integration, reducing conflict and creating predictability in social life.

• Example: In many societies, the value placed on education or family loyalty helps maintain cohesion and motivates people to fulfil socially approved roles.

Rules and Norms

Culture also relies on norms: the unwritten rules that guide behaviour in everyday situations.

These range from small conventions (e.g., queuing politely) to major moral expectations (e.g., not stealing or lying).

Through socialisation, people learn to follow these norms, which helps maintain order and predictability.

• Social Control: Norms act as a form of social control. When people deviate from accepted standards, sanctions such as disapproval, punishment, or exclusion remind them of the limits of acceptable behaviour.

• Example: A student who cheats in an exam may be punished formally by the school, but also informally by losing the trust of friends and teachers.

In this way, cultural transmission doesn’t just preserve knowledge. It teaches people how to live together peacefully, reducing chaos and uncertainty.

---

2. Allowing Change and Innovation

While culture provides stability, it is not static.

Societies constantly evolve through new discoveries, inventions, and interactions with other groups.

This adaptability is what enables cultures to survive over time.

Mechanisms of Cultural Change

Sociologists identify three main mechanisms by which culture changes and develops:

1. Discovery – The process of recognising or learning about something that already exists but was previously unknown or undervalued.

   • Example: The recognition of women’s athletic achievements and leadership skills challenged old gender stereotypes, leading to broader acceptance of female participation in sports and politics.

2. Invention – The creation of something new by combining existing cultural elements.

   • Example: The invention of the smartphone transformed communication by merging the telephone, internet, and camera. Such technological changes can rapidly alter work, education, and social relationships.

3. Diffusion – The spread of cultural ideas, technologies, or practices from one society to another.

   • Example: Food, music, and fashion trends like sushi, hip-hop, and denim have spread worldwide through cultural diffusion.

   • Globalisation has accelerated diffusion, allowing ideas to spread quickly through media, travel, and the internet. However, societies often adapt borrowed elements to fit their own traditions, a process known as cultural hybridisation.

Cultural Lag

Change does not always happen smoothly.

Cultural lag occurs when material culture (things and technologies) changes faster than non-material culture (values, laws, and beliefs).

• Example: When social media became widespread, societies struggled to adapt moral and legal standards around privacy, data sharing, and misinformation.

• This lag can lead to social tension, as institutions and laws try to catch up with technological and ethical realities.

Overall, cultural transmission balances continuity and change, maintaining the core of society while allowing innovation and adaptation to new challenges.

---

Shaping Identity

Cultural transmission is not just important for societies; it is essential for individual identity and development.

Through socialisation, people learn to see themselves as members of a community, understand their social roles, and form a sense of self.

Learning Who We Are

Human beings are social creatures: we develop our sense of self through interaction.

• Without social contact, people cannot learn language, empathy, or basic social skills.

• Values and beliefs are internalised through repeated experiences until they feel natural and automatic.

• According to Symbolic Interactionism, people don’t just passively absorb culture: they help create and reshape it through everyday interactions.

Example: A child learns the meaning of fairness by playing with peers and negotiating over turns; through this process, moral concepts become personally meaningful.

---

Roles, Gender, and Identity

Socialisation teaches people the roles and expectations associated with different social positions.

Social Roles and Expectations

People learn how to behave as students, parents, friends, or workers. Each role carries norms that define how a person should act in specific situations.

Gender and Ethnicity

• Gender Socialisation: From early childhood, boys and girls are often taught to behave in ways that reflect their society’s views of masculinity and femininity. For example, boys might be encouraged to be competitive or independent, while girls might be encouraged to be caring and cooperative.

• Racial and Ethnic Socialisation: Families and communities also pass on messages about cultural pride, traditions, and strategies for dealing with prejudice or discrimination. These messages help shape personal identity and belonging.

Social Class

Social class also influences the kind of values and attitudes people learn:

• Working-class families may emphasise discipline, respect for authority, and practical skills.

• Middle-class families often value independence, reasoning, and achievement. This contributes to what Pierre Bourdieu called cultural capital: the knowledge, language, and manners that give certain groups advantages in education and employment.
  
  As a result, socialisation can reinforce existing inequalities by preparing children for the social positions their parents hold.

---

Societal Evolution

Cultural transmission not only maintains society. It fuels social change and human progress.

By sharing knowledge and building on past achievements, people create more complex and advanced societies.

Knowledge and Language

Language is the primary tool for transmitting culture.

• It allows people to communicate ideas, share experiences, and pass on wisdom.

• Language connects generations and frees humans from the limits of time and space, enabling cultural memory and innovation.

• Sociologist Durkheim saw shared language and stories as essential for social solidarity, giving people a common identity and purpose.

---

Education and Innovation

Formal education systems are designed to transmit society’s core knowledge, skills, and values.

• Schools prepare individuals to participate in modern life and work, teaching everything from literacy to teamwork.

• They also encourage creativity and innovation, providing the knowledge base that allows scientists, artists, and thinkers to develop new ideas and technologies.

• In this way, education ensures both cultural continuity and cultural progress.

---

Modernisation and Technology

Over time, societies undergo social change: long-term transformations in structure, culture, and everyday life.

• Technology is one of the main forces driving this change. Innovations in communication, transport, and medicine reshape how people live, work, and connect.

• As societies modernise, they often become larger, more diverse, and more impersonal. Traditional values may weaken, but individuals usually gain greater personal freedom and opportunities for self-expression.

• These changes reflect the ongoing balance between cultural stability and adaptation, between the old and the new.

---

Critical Evaluation of Cultural Transmission Theory

The theory’s central strength is also its central vulnerability. It is an integrative framework, drawing on anthropology, sociology, developmental psychology, and evolutionary theory. That breadth makes the whole theory harder to falsify than any single claim.

Explanatory Power

The typology has lasted because it does more than describe.

Cavalli-Sforza and Feldman (1981) showed that the pattern of transmission predicts the speed and scope of cultural change. Boyd and Richerson (1985) later generalised this into a full account of biased cultural evolution.

Together, these accounts explain why peer-driven and media-driven shifts can outpace the generation-paced change of vertical transmission. Vertical transmission is slower by nature. It cannot match the speed of peers or mass media.

A new slang word shows the pattern. It spreads through peer groups in months, while parents rarely pass it on.

That is a prediction with real content, not just a classification. It is why the typology remains useful long after the early models were built.

The Internalisation Problem

Grusec and Goodnow (1994) exposed a persistent weak point. The theory explains how content is presented better than how it is internalised.

Exposure to a value, norm, or practice is necessary but not sufficient. Some transmitted content takes hold and some does not. Why depends on harder-to-measure constructs such as perceived legitimacy, warmth, and accurate perception, not on transmission itself.

Their two-step model makes the point.

A child must first perceive the parent’s message accurately, then accept it as valid. Harsh or arbitrary discipline weakens both steps, producing compliance without internalisation.

Imitation research shows it too (Legare & Nielsen, 2015). From the outside, a child’s acceptance of a convention and mere compliance with it are hard to tell apart.

Transmission alone cannot tell us which values a child ends up holding.

Measurement and Causation

Much of the evidence for cultural transmission is correlational. Family social class predicts the content that gets transmitted, as the cultural capital literature shows.

But separating transmission’s own causal contribution from the genetic and material advantages passed down alongside it is difficult. Observational family data alone cannot do it.

Parents often pass on material advantages and genes alongside their cultural habits.

Grusec and Goodnow’s synthesis shares this limit. It draws on largely correlational studies, disproportionately of White, Western, middle-class families. Its key concept, acceptance, is also hard to measure independently of the outcomes it is meant to predict.

Most accounts of intergenerational continuity face the same problem. A theory built on correlations struggles to show that transmission, rather than shared circumstances, made children resemble their parents.

Why Transmission Is Not Uniform

Functionalist readings (Durkheim, Parsons) risk overstating how smoothly a culture is passed down. Peer transmission and media transmission routinely produce sub-groups whose values diverge sharply from the mainstream culture their parents tried to transmit.

Dual inheritance theory predicts exactly this. Its conformist bias can produce durable subcultural divergence within groups as well as across them, rather than a single shared culture.

Crime shows both its reach and its limits. Through differential association theory, it explains how deviant values and techniques spread through close association.

But it struggles to explain why some people exposed to deviant peers never adopt deviant values, while others with no such exposure do. That gap points to individual differences the transmission framework alone does not capture.

Comparison With Rival Theories

Cultural transmission theory overlaps with several rival or complementary accounts:

• Sociocultural theory: Vygotsky also holds that higher functions are learned through cultural tools, but explains one child’s mind, not population-level reproduction.
• Sociobiology: sociobiology proposes a genetic basis for some social behaviour. Dual inheritance theory treats genes and culture as co-evolving channels, not rivals.
• Cultural capital: Bourdieu’s theory applies vertical transmission to social class, specifying which content families pass on differently and why schools reward it.
• Symbolic interactionism: sees culture as continuously remade in interaction, so each generation reinterprets what it receives.
• Differential association: applies the same mechanism narrowly to learning crime, rather than to the whole of culture.

These theories are best read as complementary. Cultural transmission theory supplies the general mechanism, and the others refine one level or application of it.

Contemporary Research

Recent work asks a finer question than whether observation transmits culture. It asks when learners copy exactly and when they depart from what they were shown. Legare and Nielsen’s (2015) synthesis offers the strongest answer: it depends on the type of content being transmitted.

Imitating Versus Innovating

Overimitation protects against missing a hidden causal step. Conventions work differently: copying them faithfully is what makes the performance correct.

The review draws on several converging experimental paradigms, so it sits relatively high on the evidence hierarchy for a developmental claim. It has also been widely cited. Its main limit is sampling: most experiments used Western, laboratory-based samples of young children.

How far the distinction holds in non-Western settings, where much learning happens through informal apprenticeship, is not yet firmly established.

Cultural Evolution Research

Mesoudi (2016) reviewed the cultural evolution research programme. It descends from the early quantitative models (Cavalli-Sforza & Feldman, 1981) and from dual inheritance theory (Boyd & Richerson, 1985).

The review surveys the case for treating cultural change as a process of variation, selection, and transmission. It also catalogues live controversies. One is how far the biological analogy should be pushed. Another is how to weigh content, conformist, and prestige biases against one another.

Read together, the developmental and population-level literatures converge. Cultural transmission is neither a uniform copying reflex nor a free-for-all of individual reinvention. It is a structured, biased process. Its outcomes depend on what is transmitted, who transmits it, and how faithfully that content is expected to be reproduced.

---

References

Anderson, E. (1994). The code of the streets. Atlantic monthly, 273(5), 81-94.

Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045925

Berg, M. T., & Stewart, E. A. (2009). Cultural transmission theory. 21st century criminology: A reference handbook, 228-235.

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton University Press.

Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (2013). Delinquency and opportunity: A study of delinquent gangs. Routledge.

Cohen, A. K. (2015). Delinquent boys. Criminology Theory: Selected Classic Readings, 133-148.

Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.4

Legare, C. H., & Nielsen, M. (2015). Imitation and innovation: The dual engines of cultural learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(11), 688–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.005

Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Mead, M. (1935). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. William Morrow.

Mead, M. (1950). Male and female: A study of the sexes in a changing world. Victor Gollancz.

Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. University of Chicago Press.

Mesoudi, A. (2016). Cultural evolution: A review of theory, findings and controversies. Evolutionary Biology, 43(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9320-0

Miller, S. L. (2011). After the crime. New York University Press.

Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. Macmillan.

Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of criminology (3rd ed.). J. B. Lippincott.

Wolfgang, M. E., Ferracuti, F., & Mannheim, H. (1967). The subculture of violence: Towards an integrated theory in criminology (Vol. 16). London: Tavistock Publications.