Displacement Defense Mechanism

In psychology, displacement is an unconscious defense mechanism where unwanted feelings or impulses are redirected from a threatening or inappropriate target to a less threatening one. For example, someone angry at their boss might yell at their spouse instead. It helps reduce anxiety but can lead to problems in other relationships.

What Is Displacement? Definition and Mechanism

Displacement is one of the classic defense mechanisms, first described in psychoanalytic theory by Sigmund Freud and later analyzed by Anna Freud.

Defense mechanisms are unconscious strategies the mind uses to protect itself from anxiety or uncomfortable emotions.

In displacement, the mind shifts an unacceptable or threatening feeling (such as anger, fear, or shame) onto a substitute target that feels safer or more permissible. The feeling stays genuine. Only its target changes.

In this way, displacement reduces anxiety and internal tension. It gives an outlet to emotions that would otherwise stay bottled up or cause inner conflict.

The Threatening Target and the Safe Substitute

The original target is usually someone with the power to retaliate or withdraw something the person needs, such as a boss or parent. The substitute is typically less threatening or even powerless.

Expressing anger toward it carries little risk. Displacement is therefore often aggression flowing downhill, which is why it so readily lands on vulnerable people.

For example, confronting a boss might cost the person their job or lead to conflict, so they unconsciously withhold the anger at work. The pent-up emotion does not disappear. Instead, it is released later on a more acceptable target, such as a friend or family member.

The choice of substitute is not random. In experiments, the more a substitute resembles the original provoker, the more displaced aggression it attracts (Marcus-Newhall et al., 2000).

Why Displacement Stays Unconscious

This happens outside conscious awareness. People using displacement rarely notice the link between the original trigger and where they direct their feelings.

Only on reflection, or with professional help, might someone notice the link. Then comes the thought: “I wasn’t really angry at X; I was upset about Y and took it out on X.” That is the moment of insight.

Displacement differs from repression. Repression pushes a feeling out of awareness altogether. In displacement, the feeling is expressed. It is simply aimed at the “wrong” target, with its intensity intact.

Displacement most often involves anger and aggression. It can apply to other feelings or impulses too.

Understanding this mechanism reveals how the mind tries to regulate emotion and protect us. It does so by temporarily avoiding direct confrontation with what truly hurts or scares us.

Examples and Real-Life Applications

These examples show how displacement often involves blaming or attacking the wrong target.

In each example, the individual is dealing with strong emotions that they couldn’t express toward the actual source, so they find a safer outlet.

• Workplace: An employee gets berated by their boss for a mistake.
  
  The employee cannot retaliate against the boss, so later they yell at a waiter over a minor error in their lunch order​. The anger meant for the boss is displaced onto an innocent server.
• Family: A parent feels frustrated with their spouse for not helping with chores.
  
  When the children misbehave slightly, the parent explodes in anger at the kids, accusing them of never helping, even though the intensity of anger really came from the spouse issue​.
  
  The parent’s anger was redirected from spouse to children.
• Relationships: Someone is secretly attracted to their best friend’s partner, an emotion they know is unacceptable to act on.
  
  Instead, they unconsciously displace that forbidden desire by developing a sudden attraction to other people who resemble the friend’s partner (for example, becoming very interested in people who wear glasses, just because the friend’s partner wears glasses)​.
  
  In this way, the romantic feelings are channeled to a safer target.
• Social: A person who feels powerless after losing their job might displace their frustration onto a scapegoat.
  
  They blame a minority or other group in the community for their financial problems, even though that group is not the real cause​.
  
  This is known as scapegoating: blaming a person or group for problems they did not cause. It is essentially displacement on a group of people.

Research supports the workplace-to-home chain. Hoobler and Brass (2006) surveyed employees and their partners. Employees who faced hostile, demeaning treatment from a supervisor were more likely to undermine their partners at home.

The authors framed this as displaced aggression, because employees could not safely retaliate against a more powerful supervisor. The spillover also damaged the partner’s own attitudes at work.

Advantages of Displacement

It’s important to note that these “advantages” are usually short-term and defensive.

Displacement can be considered a normal and sometimes healthy coping mechanism when used infrequently or in moderation. It offers four short-term benefits:

• Immediate Relief: Displacement discharges stress or anger that has no safe outlet, easing tension in the short run.
• Conflict Avoidance: Redirecting feelings spares the person retaliation or rejection by the true source of distress.
• Emotional Stability: It lets people carry on with daily responsibilities and protects self-esteem after humiliation.
• Social Acceptability: Venting at a safer target can break fewer social norms than confronting the real one.

1. Immediate Emotional Relief:

Displacement can alleviate stress or anger temporarily by providing an outlet.

Instead of keeping emotions bottled up (which could feel unbearable or cause internal turmoil), the person releases them on a safer object or person.

This eases anxiety and tension in the short run. It is a quick way to cope with feelings of stress, anger, or frustration that have no immediate solution or acceptable expression. It offers relief, not a fix.

For example, slamming a door or shouting into a pillow, rather than at one’s boss, can bring a brief sense of relief. That relief may be short-lived. Studies of venting find that discharging anger tends to feed it rather than extinguish it (Bushman, 2002).

2. Avoiding Direct Conflict or Punishment:

By redirecting feelings to a less threatening target, the individual avoids confronting the true source of distress when that source could retaliate or reject them.

This can protect the person from negative consequences.

For instance, not yelling back at a yelling boss prevents likely career damage; displacing that anger elsewhere spares the person from an even worse outcome at work​.

In this way, displacement works as a social conflict-avoidance mechanism. It helps someone steer clear of fights or dangers that could arise from expressing anger to the “wrong” person at the wrong time.

3. Emotional Regulation and Stability:

Though unhealthy if overused, a small degree of displacement might help an individual maintain emotional stability in challenging moments.

It allows them to carry on with daily responsibilities (finishing the workday, attending to family) by deferring an emotional breakdown or outburst at the source.

Psychologists note that defense mechanisms like displacement can preserve one’s ego or self-esteem temporarily​.

For example, a scolded person may feel powerless and ashamed. Later, asserting themselves over someone else, even inappropriately, can restore a sense of control.

This momentary boost can protect the individual’s self-image from total collapse in the face of humiliation or helplessness.

4. Social Acceptability (in some cases):

In certain situations, expressing anger or aggression directly would violate social norms (e.g., screaming at a parent, or crying at work out of fear).

Displacing the emotion to a more acceptable outlet can be a way to conform to social expectations while still letting off steam.

For instance, a child who is furious at a parent might punch a pillow or throw toys around in their room. This behavior is not ideal. Even so, it is more acceptable than yelling at or hitting the parent.

This serves as a pressure valve, releasing emotions in a way less likely to cause social sanction.

Disadvantages of Displacement

Disadvantages of displacement often outweigh the short-term relief it provides, especially if it becomes a go-to strategy.

It offers only a temporary escape from the real issue, while potentially causing collateral damage to relationships and personal well-being.

Over-reliance on displacement can trap a person in a loop of unresolved anger and conflict, preventing healthier coping or resolution of problems. Six costs stand out:

• Misdirected Aggression: Anger lands on an innocent target, who bears the brunt of an unfair, exaggerated reaction.
• Damaged Relationships: The safest targets are often loved ones, so trust and goodwill erode over time.
• Unresolved Problems: The original source of distress persists and can resurface in more troublesome ways.
• Negativity Cycles: One person’s displaced anger can pass down a chain of family members or colleagues.
• Maladaptive Coping: Habitual displacement is linked with wider difficulties, though the evidence is correlational.
• Scapegoating: At group level, displacement can fuel prejudice by blaming innocent people for hard times.

1. Misdirected Aggression:

Displacement often results in anger or hurt aimed at the wrong target.

The substitute target is usually innocent or unrelated to the original conflict, so they bear the brunt of an unfair reaction.

This can lead to exaggerated outbursts. The emotion is out of proportion to the triggering event.

For example, someone who blows up at a waiter over a small mistake, when the real issue is an earlier fight with a spouse, is overreacting. The waiter did nothing to deserve it.

Such inappropriate expressions of emotion can cause confusion or pain to others and may damage the displaced-upon target (emotionally or even physically, if objects are broken in anger).

In essence, displacement can turn loved ones, friends, or bystanders into emotional punching bags.

2. Strained and Damaged Relationships:

Because people tend to take out their negative feelings on those closest or safest to them, displacement frequently targets friends, family, or other loved ones​.

Over time, this can seriously erode trust and goodwill. The recipients of displaced anger may feel hurt, confused, or resentful at being constantly blamed or yelled at for minor things.

Repeated episodes of displaced aggression can lead to ongoing conflict, resentment, or withdrawal in relationships​.

For instance, a spouse who is regularly subjected to anger that actually stems from their partner’s job stress will likely feel unjustly treated.

This dynamic undermines the health and stability of the relationship​.

Friends and family might start to distance themselves to avoid being targets, leaving the individual more isolated.

In short, while displacement might avoid one conflict, it often creates new conflicts with others, pushing away the very people who provide support.

3. Failure to Resolve Root Problems:

Displacement never addresses the actual source of distress. It is a detour for the emotion.

As a result, the original issue remains unresolved, and the associated feelings can persist or even intensify over time.

The person may continue to suffer the same stress or fear that caused the anger, such as an unfair boss or a deeper insecurity. They have not confronted or processed it.

This can lead to an accumulation of unresolved psychological stress.

Psychologists note that relying on defenses like displacement makes it harder to understand one’s true emotions and the root causes of those feelings​.

The individual might be angry all the time without realizing exactly why, since they always displace it instead of acknowledging the real trigger.

This lack of insight hinders personal growth and problem-solving​.

In essence, displacement only postpones or masks the issue. It may provide relief today. Later, the original conflict or emotion is likely to resurface, possibly in a more troublesome way.

4. Cycle of Negativity:

Displacement can set off a chain reaction of negative behavior.

One person’s displaced anger can provoke irritation or distress in the new target, who in turn might go on to displace their own feelings onto a third party.

For example, one grievance can travel through a whole household:

• An employee angry at their boss comes home and yells at their spouse.
• The upset spouse then snaps at the children.
• The frustrated children fight with each other.

This way, a single instance of displacement ripples outward, creating a cycle of anger and negativity that affects multiple people​.

Such cycles can make the overall emotional atmosphere in a family or group much worse, spreading conflict rather than containing it.

5. Escalation into Maladaptive Behavior:

If displacement becomes a frequent coping method, it can be associated with broader mental health issues or unhealthy behaviors.

Defense use predicts adjustment (Cramer, 2015). Displacement itself is classed as a neurotic-level defense: more mature than denial or projection, but less mature than sublimation or humor (Vaillant, 1977).

For instance, one study noted that individuals with alcohol use disorder scored higher on measures of displacement than those without the disorder. Such findings are correlational and self-report based. They cannot show that displacement causes the disorder.

One suggestion is that habitual displacement may worsen problems like addiction. A person may turn to substances to cope with residual anger or to justify aggressive outbursts. The causal link remains unproven.

Constantly avoiding direct confrontation through displacement can also:

• Lead to chronic patterns of avoidance.
• Make it harder to handle stress in a healthy way.
• Reinforce feelings of helplessness, since the real issues are never tackled.
• Reduce the person’s capacity to cope adaptively.

6. Prejudice and Scapegoating:

Displacement also operates at a larger social level. It can fuel unfair blame toward groups or individuals who are not truly responsible for one’s problems.

Someone frustrated by personal failures might blame an ethnic minority, immigrants, or another group. The group becomes a scapegoat for their anger.

History provides tragic examples, such as scholars suggesting that post–World War I economic frustrations among Germans were displaced onto Jewish people, contributing to prejudice and violence​.

The evidence is weaker than it first appears. The classic societal test is a study by Hovland and Sears (1940).

Hepworth and West (1988) reanalyzed the same data with time-series methods. Once the shared trends were modeled, the association shrank substantially. A smaller association remained.

Green et al. (1998) found only weak, inconsistent support for the same account in modern antigay assault data.

In everyday life, a person having a bad day might lash out at the first stranger who crosses their path. A community might direct its anger about hard times toward an innocent subgroup. Both are displacement.

Such displacement not only harms the targets (through discrimination or aggression) but also distorts one’s perception of reality, creating irrational hatreds and social rifts.

It represents emotions gone astray on a broad scale.

History and Theory of Displacement

Displacement began as a theory of dreams, became a theory of defense, and then entered experimental psychology.

Freud’s Dream-Work

Freud first described displacement (German Verschiebung, “a shifting”) in The Interpretation of Dreams (1900), as part of his theory of dreams. The dream we remember, he argued, is a disguised version of a censored dream-thought. Two operations do the disguising: condensation and displacement.

In displacement, the emotionally important elements of the hidden thought appear as trivial, peripheral images. The emotional emphasis shifts onto something apparently unimportant.

As Freud put it, the dream is “differently centred from the dream-thoughts.”

That is the prototype for every later use. An emotional charge is peeled off its true object and attached to a safer one. Freud also tied the process to association: the substitute links to the original through resemblance or a shared feature.

At first, displacement was not specifically about aggression.

It described the mobility of feeling, which can slide from its proper object onto another. The anger-focused “kick the dog” reading is a later specialization.

Little Hans and the Phobias

Freud soon extended displacement to neurotic symptoms. His case study of Little Hans, Analysis of a Phobia in a Five-Year-Old Boy (1909), is the clearest example. Hans developed an intense fear of horses that stopped him leaving the house.

Freud read the phobia through the Oedipal situation, in three steps:

• Conflict: Hans loved his father but also harbored hostile, rivalrous wishes toward him.
• Displacement: The resulting anxiety shifted onto horses, which resembled the father: the black muzzle and blinkers evoked his mustache and glasses.
• Avoidance: Hans could avoid horses by staying home, but he could not avoid his father.

In this view, phobia is displacement plus avoidance.

The same logic applies to obsessional neurosis, where affect shifts from a significant idea onto a trivial one.

A symptom can then be both meaningful and disguised. It points back to a real conflict, but its overt object is a substitute.

Anna Freud and the Classification of Defenses

Anna Freud consolidated the study of the ego defenses in The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence (1936). Popular accounts sometimes say she added displacement to the list of defenses. That overstates her role.

Her enumerated defenses were regression, repression, reaction formation, isolation, undoing, projection, introjection, turning against the self and reversal, plus sublimation. Displacement was not one of her separately numbered techniques.

Instead, she analyzed displacement at work in childhood animal phobias. She compared a boy who feared a lion with Little Hans. In each child, she wrote, “aggressiveness was transformed into anxiety and the affect was displaced from the father onto an animal.”

The classification of displacement as a named defense came later. Vaillant’s (1977) maturity-based taxonomy placed it at the neurotic level, alongside repression and reaction formation.

Cramer (2015) likewise treats it as a standard, codable defense.

Frustration, Aggression and Miller’s Gradient

Displacement entered experimental psychology through the frustration-aggression hypothesis. In Frustration and Aggression (1939), Dollard, Doob, Miller, Mowrer and Sears claimed that frustration, the blocking of a goal, always produces some instigation to aggression.

Displacement explained why people often do not aggress against the true source. The frustrater may be too powerful, abstract or dangerous to attack. The aggression is displaced instead.

Two factors govern the choice of substitute: the strength of the urge to aggress and the strength of the inhibition against attacking the original target. The more dangerous the true target, the safer the substitute.

Neal Miller (1948) turned this idea into a testable prediction. Using stimulus generalization, he argued that a substitute attracts aggression in proportion to how much it resembles the original provoker.

Fear of retaliation also generalizes, but it fades more steeply with dissimilarity. The prediction follows: displaced aggression should peak at an intermediate degree of resemblance, not at the extremes.

Displacement vs Other Defense Mechanisms

Displacement is often confused with neighboring defenses. The table shows how each handles the same unwanted impulse.

Defense	What happens to the impulse	Example
Displacement	Kept and expressed, but aimed at a safer substitute	Berated by a boss, a person shouts at their family
Sublimation	Channeled into a constructive, socially valued activity	Takes aggression to the gym or into sport
Reaction formation	Converted into its conscious opposite	Hostility shown as exaggerated kindness
Projection	Attributed to another person	“I’m not angry, you are”
Repression	Pushed out of awareness, so not expressed	The anger is not consciously felt

In scapegoating, projection and displacement often combine. Hostility is projected onto an out-group (they are the aggressors) and displaced onto it (they are attacked).

One false friend remains. Displacement also names an unrelated theory of forgetting in memory research, in which new information pushes older items out of short-term memory. The two share only a name.

Recognizing Displacement in Yourself

Recognizing when displacement is occurring is crucial to avoid these pitfalls. Because it operates unconsciously, it can be hard to spot in yourself. Often, a person only realizes in hindsight, if at all. However, several strategies can help.

Notice Disproportionate Reactions and Patterns

One key to spotting displacement is to pay attention to disproportionate or misplaced reactions. Ask yourself if your reaction fits the situation.

If you are unusually angry or upset over a small incident, reflect on whether something else is bothering you beneath the surface.

Suppose you catch yourself yelling at a waiter over a minor mistake. Pause. Consider whether your frustration stems from an earlier event, such as an argument or a bad day.

Journaling or keeping a diary of daily stresses and outbursts can help make these connections clearer. You might notice patterns, like “Every time I have a conflict with my boss, I end up arguing with my partner at night.”

Noticing such a pattern is a strong indicator of displacement.

Get an Outside Perspective

It can also be difficult for individuals to see their own displacement blind spots, so input from others can be valuable. Friends or family might gently point out, for instance, “You seem really upset about X, but is it possibly because of Y that happened earlier?”

The aim is to ask what earlier, unaddressed feeling the reaction might be carrying.

In therapeutic settings, counselors are trained to observe these patterns. A therapist may notice if a client consistently redirects frustration onto unrelated people or overreacts to minor issues. The therapist then helps the client link it back to the true source.

In short, self-awareness is the first step. Monitor your triggers and reactions. When you cannot see the pattern yourself, a trusted friend or therapist can highlight the displacement you might miss.

Managing Displacement

Once you recognize the signs of displacement, the goal is to channel your emotions in healthier ways or address the root cause rather than misdirecting them.

Here are four techniques and strategies:

• Pause and Reflect: Stop before reacting and ask what you are really upset about.
• Find Healthy Outlets: Release the pressure safely, without harming your relationships or yourself.
• Mindfulness and Relaxation: Calming the body lowers anger more reliably than venting it does.
• Address the Underlying Issue: Confront or cope with the real source of distress where you can.

Pause and Reflect:

When you feel a surge of anger or distress, try to pause before reacting.

Take a moment to identify what you’re really upset about.

Simply asking yourself “Why am I feeling this way, and is it really because of this immediate situation?” can create a gap between the feeling and the action.

This pause may prevent an unconscious displacement from occurring and give you a chance to respond more thoughtfully.

Find Healthy Outlets:

Instead of unleashing anger on a person who doesn’t deserve it, redirect that energy into a safe, constructive outlet.

For example, you could write in a journal about what happened and how you feel. Expressing your emotions on paper can release tension without hurting anyone.

Physical activity can still lift mood. As a way to vent anger, though, it is less reliable than it sounds. A meta-analysis of 154 studies found that arousal-raising activities, such as hitting a bag or jogging, did not reliably reduce anger (Kjærvik & Bushman, 2024).

Engaging in a hobby or creative activity (such as drawing, knitting, playing music, or cooking) when upset can also channel strong emotions into something productive​.

The idea is simple. Release the pressure safely, without harming your relationships or yourself. Channeling the energy into a valued activity is closer to sublimation, a more mature defense, than to displacement.

Mindfulness and Relaxation Techniques:

Practicing mindfulness can help you stay aware of your emotions in real time so that you catch displacement tendencies early.

Techniques like meditation or deep breathing exercises teach you to observe your feelings without immediately reacting.

For instance, daily meditation or yoga can increase your awareness of rising anger or anxiety. That awareness creates a choice. You can decide how to handle the feeling instead of reflexively displacing it.

These practices also reduce overall stress, which makes emotional explosions less likely. Research supports this approach.

In a meta-analysis of 154 studies, arousal-lowering activities such as deep breathing, mindfulness and yoga reliably reduced anger and aggression (Kjærvik & Bushman, 2024).

By being mindful, you can remind yourself: “I’m angry right now; let me acknowledge that without taking it out on the next person I see.” This conscious acknowledgment can defuse the urge to displace.

Address the Underlying Issue (When Possible):

Ultimately, dealing with the root cause of your distress will provide more lasting relief than displacement.

If feasible, confront or resolve the real problem constructively.

This might mean having a calm, honest conversation with the person who upset you. You could talk to your boss about how you felt during the reprimand. Or discuss the household chore balance with your spouse.

If direct confrontation is not possible (or not safe), even just acknowledging to yourself what the true source of your feelings is can be helpful. You might say internally, “I’m not actually angry at my kids; I’m angry at my situation at work.”

This self-validation can sometimes reduce the need to lash out.

Some issues are long-term or complex, such as past trauma or ongoing work stress. Gradually improving or coping with the situation will reduce the pressure that leads to displacement. Setting boundaries, seeking social support and problem-solving can all help.

Critical Evaluation of Displacement

Displacement is best supported as a measurable behavior. Aggression provoked by one person, but held back from them, is redirected onto a substitute. The redirection tracks the substitute’s resemblance to the source, and minor triggers amplify it.

Its two traditional promises fare worse. The unconscious-defense claim is unproven, and cathartic relief appears to be false.

Experimental Evidence for Displaced Aggression

Displacement is unusual among psychoanalytic ideas because it has a robust experimental literature. The strongest evidence is a meta-analysis by Marcus-Newhall et al. (2000).

Because it aggregates many controlled experiments, this is the strongest evidence that displacement is real as a behavior. Most studies used brief laboratory provocations and analogue measures, so real-world validity must be argued, not assumed.

The meta-analysis also does not test whether an unconscious impulse is involved. It vindicates displacement as description, not as a Freudian mechanism.

A second set of experiments explains why displaced aggression is sometimes explosive and sometimes absent. Pedersen, Gonzales and Miller (2000) tested how provocation and a trivial trigger combine.

This is triggered displaced aggression. It explains the everyday overreaction to a spilled drink.

Denson, Pedersen and Miller (2006) then developed the Displaced Aggression Questionnaire. It measures angry rumination, revenge planning and a tendency to displace. Scores predict outcomes such as self-reported domestic abuse and road rage.

Contemporary Research

The classic rationale for displacement, and for “letting off steam,” is catharsis: discharging anger onto a substitute should drain it away. Modern research tests that assumption.

Kjærvik and Bushman (2024) found that the benefit of arousal-lowering activities held across genders, ages and cultures, and across digital, researcher-led and therapist-led delivery. If discharging anger does not lower it, the short-term relief attributed to displacement is largely illusory.

This echoes Bushman (2002), who found that venting anger, even against a punching bag, fed later aggression rather than extinguishing it.

Two further strands complete the picture. Angry rumination links an initial provocation to later displaced aggression (Pedersen et al., 2000). A person who broods on a slight carries its charge into the next trivial trigger.

Defense research also continues to place displacement in a codable hierarchy that predicts adjustment (Cramer, 2015).

Limits of the Unconscious-Defense Claim

The behavior is well supported. The claim that an unconscious impulse drives it is not. Because the redirection is defined as unconscious, it is hard to test. Ordinary spillover, habit or rumination could explain the same reaction.

The concept is easier to invoke after the fact than to predict. Given any overreaction, one can propose a hidden original target. That raises a falsifiability worry.

The classic societal test, the lynching and cotton-price correlation, shrank under reanalysis (Hepworth & West, 1988). Evidence linking displacement to alcohol use is correlational, so it cannot show which causes which.

Reviews of the Freudian defenses reach a measured verdict. The descriptive core of displacement is well supported (Baumeister et al., 1998; Cramer, 2015; Neubauer, 1994). The surrounding machinery of repressed drives and unconscious censorship remains theory.

Rival Explanations of Misdirected Aggression

Other frameworks explain the same pattern without an unconscious defense. Three alternatives stand out:

• Stimulus Generalization: Miller’s (1948) model is pure learning theory. Aggression and its inhibition both generalize along a similarity gradient, with no psychic impulse needed.
• Excitation Transfer: Zillmann (1971) proposed that leftover arousal from a provocation is misattributed to a later, unrelated annoyance, intensifying the reaction.
• General Aggression Model: Anderson and Bushman (2002) argue that provocation primes hostile thoughts and feelings, so whoever is present becomes the target.

All three agree with displacement theory on the observable core: provocation from one source raises aggression toward an unrelated target. They diverge on why the substitute is chosen.

Displacement claims the target is selected because it is safer than the true provoker. Excitation transfer and the General Aggression Model need no such selection, and no unconscious defense. Arousal transfer works even onto entirely neutral targets.

Sources

• Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231
• Baumeister, R. F., Dale, K., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: Reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 1081-1124.
• Bowins, B. (2004). Psychological defense mechanisms: A new perspective. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 1-26.
• Bushman, B. J. (2002). Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 724-731.
• Cramer, P. (2015). Understanding defense mechanisms. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 43(4), 523-552. https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2015.43.4.523
• Denson, T. F., Pedersen, W. C., & Miller, N. (2006). The displaced aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 1032-1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.1032
• Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. Yale University Press.
• Freud, A. (2018). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. Routledge. (Original work published 1936)
• Freud, S. (1953). The interpretation of dreams. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vols. 4-5). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1900)
• Freud, S. (1955). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 10, pp. 1-150). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1909)
• Green, D. P., Glaser, J., & Rich, A. (1998). From lynching to gay bashing: The elusive connection between economic conditions and hate crime. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.82
• Hepworth, J. T., & West, S. G. (1988). Lynchings and the economy: A time-series reanalysis of Hovland and Sears (1940). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 239-247.
• Hoobler, J. M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1125-1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1125
• Hovland, C. I., & Sears, R. R. (1940). Minor studies of aggression: VI. Correlation of lynchings with economic indices. The Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1940.9917696
• Kjærvik, S. L., & Bushman, B. J. (2024). A meta-analytic review of anger management activities that increase or decrease arousal: What fuels or douses rage? Clinical Psychology Review, 109, 102414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102414
• Marcus-Newhall, A., Pedersen, W. C., Carlson, M., & Miller, N. (2000). Displaced aggression is alive and well: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 670-689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.670
• Miller, N. E. (1948). Theory and experiment relating psychoanalytic displacement to stimulus-response generalization. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43(2), 155-178.
• Neubauer, P. B. (1994). The role of displacement in psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 49(1), 107-119.
• Pedersen, W. C., Gonzales, C., & Miller, N. (2000). The moderating effect of trivial triggering provocation on displaced aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 913-927. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.913
• Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Little, Brown.
• Zillmann, D. (1971). Excitation transfer in communication-mediated aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(4), 419-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(71)90075-8