Repression as a Defense Mechanism

Repression is a psychological defense mechanism in which the mind unconsciously banishes or blocks unacceptable thoughts, painful memories, and difficult emotions from conscious awareness​.

The person is not aware that this mental process is occurring. The distressing content is pushed into the unconscious mind automatically as a way to avoid the anxiety, guilt, or shame it would cause if acknowledged​.

How It Works

Unlike suppression, which is a deliberate (conscious) effort to put something out of mind, repression happens involuntarily.

The individual simply forgets the experience or thought on a conscious level, although it remains intact in the unconscious.

For example, a person who lived through a traumatic event might have no recollection of the incident, despite having been awake and aware during it, because the memory has been repressed by the mind as a protective measure​.

Importantly, the repressed thoughts and feelings do not truly disappear – they continue to influence the person from the unconscious.

Freud’s model of the psyche likened the mind to an iceberg, with the vast majority (the unconscious) hidden beneath the surface yet still exerting an effect on behavior​.

He observed that his patients often struggled to recall certain disturbing memories, leading him to conclude that some force in the psyche was actively preventing those thoughts from reaching consciousness​.

He named that force repression, and considered it a fundamental mechanism of the mind.

According to psychoanalytic theory, these buried feelings can leak out in indirect ways – in dreams, slips of the tongue, emotional reactions, or psychosomatic symptoms – indicating that the unconscious content is still active​.

In short, repression works by hiding mental content that the conscious self finds too threatening, thereby offering immediate relief from distress, but the hidden material can still shape one’s emotions and behaviors from behind the scenes​.

Advantages

Repression can have short-term advantages for an individual’s psychological survival and stability.

1. Protection from Overwhelming Emotions:

Repression acts as a buffer against extreme stress.

By unconsciously shoving intense fear, grief, or trauma out of awareness, the mind prevents these emotions from flooding the individual all at once.

This can be crucial in the midst of a crisis or trauma – it allows the person to continue functioning (at least outwardly) without being paralyzed by horror or pain.

In Freudian terms, the ego uses repression to avoid anxiety by keeping unacceptable impulses or events out of mind​.

Thus, in the immediate moment, repression can spare someone from debilitating panic or emotional breakdown. It essentially “numbs” the psyche to allow survival in difficult circumstances.

2. Maintaining Day-to-Day Functioning:

Repression can help an individual carry on with daily life after a severe shock or during ongoing adversity.

By compartmentalizing and burying distressing experiences, people are often able to focus on necessary tasks and responsibilities without constant distraction from emotional pain.

In this way, repression can act like an emotional bandage that blunts pain just enough to let the person continue with work, social interactions, and other normal activities.

3. Adaptation in Certain Situations:

In specific contexts, repression might be considered adaptive or beneficial.

Research has noted that people who employ repression as a coping mechanism sometimes have better well-being indicators than those who don’t, at least in the short term​.

Notably, studies have found that repressive coping becomes more common with older adults and may contribute to emotional resilience in later life​.

One explanation is that with age, individuals learn to “tune out” trivial or past negatives and focus on present positives – effectively a mild form of repression that avoids ruminating on losses or regrets. In moderation, this can preserve a positive outlook and reduce stress.

Moreover, from an evolutionary perspective, temporarily repressing fear or pain could be advantageous.

For example, a soldier repressing terror in battle in order to function, or a survivor of an accident pushing aside shock to act quickly.

In summary, repression can serve as a mental defense that provides short-lived stability, allowing people to withstand and navigate immediate hardships​.

Disadvantages

Repression is generally seen as a maladaptive coping mechanism in the long run.

Repression doesn’t resolve the underlying issue; it only postpones and conceals it. Over-reliance on repression can lead to significant downsides:

1. Long-Term Psychological Distress:

Sigmund Freud believed that repressed emotions and memories continue to operate unconsciously and can generate anxiety and psychological tension over time​.

The immediate anxiety might be avoided, but the internal conflict remains unresolved.

In fact, Freud argued that repression is at the root of many neurotic disorders: the person may develop anxiety, phobias, or other symptoms as a indirect expression of the buried feelings.

Modern research supports the idea that routinely repressing emotions is associated with higher stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms​.

By not processing the emotion, the individual essentially carries it hidden inside, where it can fester. Over the long term, this can lead to chronic tension and mood disturbances.

What felt like relief initially often turns into greater anxiety later, as the effort to keep content repressed drains mental energy and the suppressed material seeks expression​.

2. Emotional Numbing and Interpersonal Difficulties:

A common byproduct of habitual repression is a general numbing of emotion.

Because the person constantly pushes down feelings, they may start to lose touch with what they truly feel even in situations where they could safely express emotion.

People with a repressive coping style often report feeling blank or emotionally flat – for example, they regularly feel numb or indifferent​.

They might also feel low-level nervousness or stress for no reason, which in reality is the leakage of unconscious anxiety​.

This emotional blunting can create problems in relationships: the individual finds it hard to open up or talk about things that matter, and may even become defensive or irritated when others probe their feelings​.

Loved ones might experience them as distant or unresponsive.

Repressed emotions can thus impede intimacy and communication, since the person is essentially walling off a part of themselves.

Additionally, because they avoid confronting feelings, they might lack empathy for others’ emotions or feel uncomfortable when someone else shows distress​.

Over time, this pattern of emotional avoidance can alienate friends and family, leading to loneliness or misunderstanding.

3. Sudden Outbursts and “Leakage” of Emotions:

Pushing emotions out of awareness does not eliminate them; instead, the feelings often build up pressure unconsciously. Sooner or later, that pressure finds a release.

Clinical psychologist, Dr. Julie Smith, likens repression to holding a beach ball underwater – you can only push it down for so long before it pops back up.

A classic example is an individual who represses anger: they convince themselves they are “not upset” and swallow their irritation repeatedly, but eventually they explode over a trivial matter.

The reaction seems disproportionate because it’s fueled by a reservoir of unacknowledged anger that has been accumulating.

Psychologists note that repressed emotions tend to surface in indirect or uncontrolled ways – sometimes called a return of the repressed.

One sign is when a relatively small trigger causes an unexpectedly intense emotional reaction.

Indeed, research on emotional repression finds that if someone cannot express feelings in healthy ways, those feelings may burst out inappropriately after accumulating.

Examples include sudden crying spells, angry outbursts, or panic attacks that seem to come out of nowhere.

The person might not even connect the episode to the original, buried source of emotion, which makes it harder to address.

These uncontrolled outpourings can be disruptive and even frightening, both for the individual and those around them.

4. Physical Health Effects:

The mind and body are deeply connected, and repressing emotions for long periods can take a physical toll.

The chronic stress of holding in painful feelings has been linked to a variety of health issues.

Freud himself observed that some patients’ repressions manifested in physical symptoms (a concept seen in conversion disorders and psychosomatic illness).

Modern research has similarly found correlations between emotional suppression/repression and health problems.

Some signs that have been linked with repressed emotions include high blood pressure, fatigue, headaches, and various aches and pains with no clear medical cause​

The internalized stress may dysregulate bodily systems, contributing to tension headaches or gastrointestinal issues, for example.

In general, when emotional energy is not released or managed, it may weaken the immune system and increase inflammation, making the person more vulnerable to illnesses.

Therefore, repression can undermine physical well-being as well as mental health.

5. Stunted Personal Growth:

Another downside of repression is that it blocks psychological growth and self-understanding. Emotions (even very painful ones) serve as signals about our needs, boundaries, and experiences.

By repressing them, a person loses access to valuable information about themselves.

They may repeat unhealthy patterns or stay in harmful situations because the emotions that would normally push them to change (like anger to signal injustice, or fear to signal danger) are being denied.

In therapy, much of personal growth comes from confronting and working through difficult feelings; repression prevents this process.

It can also create an inner split – the person doesn’t fully integrate aspects of their own history or personality.

This can lead to feelings of emptiness or the sense that one doesn’t truly know oneself. In sum, what was a short-term coping mechanism ends up limiting emotional capacity and resilience in the long run.

Coping

Coping with repressed emotions involves reversing the habit of avoidance.

Through therapy, self-reflection, safe expression, and support, individuals can learn to face and feel their emotions gradually.

This process can be difficult, but it leads to better long-term outcomes – reducing the psychological and physical strain of repression and fostering a more integrated, healthy psyche.

1. Professional Psychotherapy (Talk Therapy):

Seeking help from a mental health professional is often a crucial step in dealing with repressed material.

In classic psychoanalysis, which was Freud’s method, the therapist uses techniques like free association, dream analysis, and interpretation to help the client uncover repressed memories and feelings from the unconscious.

Psychoanalytic theory holds that making the unconscious conflicts conscious allows the person to work through them, so psychoanalysis is a primary tool for releasing repressed emotions​.

In modern practice, other forms of talk therapy can also be very effective. Therapists provide a safe space where clients are encouraged to explore their feelings without judgment.

Simply being able to name and discuss long-buried emotions with an empathic listener can be tremendously healing.

Approaches like psychodynamic therapy or emotion-focused therapy (EFT) specifically help individuals become aware of and process emotions that they have been avoiding.

EFT, for example, emphasizes expressing and understanding emotions as key to improving one’s mental health, and can be particularly helpful for people who have chronically repressed their feelings​.

Over time, therapy can increase a person’s comfort with confronting difficult feelings and provide them with healthier strategies to deal with those emotions​.

It’s important to note that therapy proceeds at the client’s pace – the goal is not to force someone to recall a traumatic memory or feel an emotion before they are ready​.

A skilled therapist will gently guide the process of uncovering repressed material, ensuring that the client has adequate support and coping tools as they face those feelings.

Therapeutic approaches like trauma-focused therapy, EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing), or guided imagery can assist individuals in safely revisiting and processing traumatic memories that were long buried.

The process is typically slow and carefully managed: the therapist will ensure you have coping skills in place (like grounding techniques) before delving into the trauma.

Over time, as the repressed memory is brought to light and emotionally processed, its power diminishes.

You might also use narrative techniques – for instance, writing a story or letter about what happened – to give structure and sense to the memory, which can reduce its fear factor.

2. Mindfulness and Emotional Awareness:

Developing a habit of mindfulness can counteract repression by fostering greater awareness of one’s internal state.

Mindfulness means intentionally paying attention to the present moment – including any emotions that arise – without immediately trying to push them away or judge them.

Practices like meditation, deep-breathing exercises, or body scans help individuals notice subtle emotional cues and bodily sensations associated with feelings.

Since repressed emotions often manifest as physical sensations (tight chest, lump in throat, etc.), tuning into the body can alert a person that something is bothering them emotionally.

Once you notice an emotion beginning (even something vague like “I feel uneasy”), you can acknowledge it instead of automatically repressing it.

Journaling is another powerful mindfulness tool: writing down your thoughts and feelings regularly can help bring buried emotions to the surface.

Some therapists suggest using a feelings journal or art to express what’s inside – for example, writing freely about whatever comes to mind, or drawing with colors that match your mood​.

This kind of private, creative expression can circumvent the inner censor and reveal emotions you didn’t realize you had.

The key is to practice observing and naming your emotions: you might start by simply checking in with yourself a few times a day, asking “What am I feeling right now?” and labeling it without judgement (“I feel angry,” or “I feel sad”).

By recognizing and accepting those feelings in the moment, you reduce the tendency to repress them.

3. Gradual Emotional Expression:

If you have a long history of repressing emotions, it can be scary to start expressing them.

It’s often best to take small steps. One technique is to use “I statements” when talking about feelings, even if only to yourself at first.

For example, say (or journal) “I feel hurt,” “I feel afraid,” etc., to practice putting emotions into words.

This reinforces the idea that you have feelings and are allowed to state them. You can also start by expressing milder emotions or positive emotions to build confidence.

It might be easier to say “I really liked that movie, it made me happy” as practice, and later work up to saying “I felt upset when you said that” in a more charged situation​.

Letting go of self-judgment is crucial during this process. If you’ve been repressing, you might have an internal critic telling you that certain emotions are “wrong” or that you’re weak for feeling them.

Try to consciously counter that with a non-judgmental stance: remind yourself that any feeling is valid. For instance, instead of thinking “I shouldn’t be angry about this,” tell yourself “I do feel angry about this, and that’s okay – there’s a reason for it.”

By reframing your mindset to accept emotions rather than judge them, you make it safer for your mind to let emotions rise up.

Over time, practicing these skills transforms emotional expression from something threatening (that must be repressed) into something normal and manageable.

4. Supportive Relationships and Communication:

Engaging with trusted friends or support groups can help in un-repressing emotions.

Often, repression thrives in isolation – when you feel you’re alone with your feelings or that no one would understand.

Finding at least one person you trust and talking about your feelings can be very liberating.

You might start by simply sharing small truths (“I’ve been stressed at work” or “I’m feeling a bit down lately”) with a close friend or family member.

If this person is supportive, you’ll likely discover that speaking about your feelings doesn’t cause the sky to fall – in fact, it usually brings relief and closeness.

Little by little, you can challenge the habit of silence that repression imposes.

Some people also find group therapy or support groups helpful, as they provide a space where others are opening up about their emotions, making it easier for you to do the same.

Communication is the antidote to the secrecy of repression.

By making it a habit to share your emotions regularly (and encouraging loved ones to do the same), you normalize emotional expression in your life.

This reduces the fear or shame that keeps emotions bottled up.

Remember that you don’t have to divulge your deepest traumas immediately; even discussing day-to-day frustrations or joys can flex those emotional muscles and prevent bottling up.

The empathy and feedback from others also remind you that feelings are human and acceptable, not something to hide away.

Freudian Theory of Repression

Sigmund Freud’s theory of repression is one of the cornerstones of his psychoanalytic model.

Freud originally formulated the concept of repression as he tried to understand why many of his patients could not recall important memories, especially those related to traumatic or distressing events in their childhoods.

During his psychoanalytic sessions (in the late 19th century), Freud observed that patients often became resistant or unable to continue when a painful memory was near the surface.

It was as if some invisible mental force was holding the memory back.

He described this force as one that “prevented [memories] from becoming conscious and compelled them to remain unconscious,” and he named the process repression​.

In a famous statement, Freud later referred to the theory of repression as “the corner-stone on which the whole structure of psychoanalysis rests.”​

This highlights how central repression was in Freud’s understanding of the mind.

In Freud’s structural model of the psyche, the ego (the conscious self that mediates reality) uses repression to keep threatening impulses of the id (the primitive, instinctual drives) out of awareness, often in response to pressure from the superego (the internalized moral standards).

Repression was thus seen as a fundamental ego defense mechanism – an unconscious strategy the ego employs to reduce internal conflict and anxiety​.

In fact, Freud considered repression to be the primary defense mechanism that lays the groundwork for all others.

He identified repression as the first defense mechanism discovered, and believed it to be the most important one​.

Other defense mechanisms (like denial, projection, rationalization, etc., many of which were later catalogued by Freud’s daughter Anna Freud) were thought to either supplement repression or operate on content that had already been repressed.

In simple terms, repression kicks in when an experience or impulse is so unacceptable that the person completely removes it from conscious thought, effectively banning it to the unconscious.

Only after this does the mind might use other defenses – for example, if an aggressive impulse is repressed, the person might then project it onto someone else, seeing others as hostile (here projection is a secondary defense, with repression being the initial step of blocking the impulse internally).

Freud’s topographical model (the iceberg metaphor of conscious, preconscious, and unconscious) illustrates repression’s role. He believed much of mental life resides in the unconscious, thanks to repression pushing it there​

These repressed wishes and memories, often originating in childhood, do not vanish; rather, they form what Freud called the dynamic unconscious, continually influencing feelings and behavior.

Freud linked repression particularly to childhood sexuality and trauma.

For example, in his early work with hysterical patients, he thought that repressed traumatic memories (such as childhood abuse or frightening experiences) were converted into physical symptoms.

He also proposed that children repress desires or feelings that society deems inappropriate (famous concepts like the Oedipus complex involve a child repressing incestuous wishes toward the opposite-sex parent)​.

In Freud’s theory, repression explains why people are often unaware of the real motives behind their actions or the real origins of their psychological problems.

The content is locked away in the unconscious, but it exerts influence indirectly, causing unexplained moods, slips of the tongue (Freudian slips), dreams with symbolic meanings, and neurotic symptoms​.

The goal of Freudian psychoanalysis is fundamentally to undo repression – “where id was, ego shall be,” as Freud famously said, meaning the unconscious must be made conscious.

Freud developed techniques like free association (encouraging patients to say whatever comes to mind without censorship) to bypass the conscious defenses and tap into repressed material.

He interpreted dreams as the “royal road to the unconscious,” believing that even in their disguised form, dreams could reveal repressed wishes​

By bringing repressed thoughts and feelings into consciousness within the safety of the therapeutic relationship, Freud aimed to allow the patient to confront and resolve those hidden conflicts.

This cathartic release and integration of previously buried material would, in theory, alleviate the neurotic symptoms that the repression had caused.

Essentially, Freud saw repression as a double-edged sword: it was a necessary mental function for avoiding immediate pain, but if used excessively, it was the source of psychological illness.

Criticisms

Freud’s concept of repression has generated considerable debate and critique in modern psychology.

While the idea of pushing painful experiences out of awareness is intuitively appealing and has been influential, researchers and clinicians have raised questions about its validity, prevalence, and the mechanisms behind it.

1. Lack of Empirical Evidence:

• Psychoanalytic view: Repression remains a core concept in contemporary psychoanalysis, albeit with refinements and nuances. Psychoanalysts often differentiate between various defense mechanisms and consider repression a clinically observable phenomenon.
• Lack of empirical evidence: Freud’s theory relied heavily on clinical observations and interpretations, which are subjective and difficult to replicate scientifically.
• Difficulty in scientifically proving repression: Attempts to demonstrate repression in laboratory settings have produced mixed and inconclusive results.
• Alternative explanations: Many contemporary psychologists argue that phenomena attributed to repression can be explained by other mechanisms like normal forgetting, conscious suppression, or avoidance.
• Lack of neuroscientific evidence: Neuroscience has not identified a specific brain mechanism that directly corresponds to Freud’s concept of repression.
• Metaphorical vs. literal: Concepts like the id, ego, and superego are now often viewed as metaphorical representations of psychological processes rather than literal brain structures.

2. The Repressed Memory Debate:

The idea that our mind can banish a trauma and later perfectly recover it is highly debated – many psychologists argue that this simplistic notion is not supported by current memory research​.

• Trauma is usually remembered: The idea that traumatic memories are automatically repressed is largely outdated.
  
  Research consistently shows that traumatic events, due to their high emotional intensity, tend to be well-remembered, often intrusively so (as seen in PTSD). This is supported by studies on memory and stress hormones.  
  
  More commonly, trauma is remembered but not discussed, or it is partially forgotten in a normal way (e.g., details fade over time), or the person avoids thinking about it (suppression) rather than it being locked away by the unconscious.
  
  While complete repression of trauma is not impossible, it’s considered rare and should not be assumed.
  
  Memory is a reconstructive process, and traumatic memories, while often vivid, can be fragmented, distorted, or incomplete.
• False memories are a real risk: Elizabeth Loftus’s work has been highly influential in demonstrating the fallibility of memory. Suggestive questioning or therapeutic techniques can lead to the creation of false memories, even ones that feel very real to the individual. This is a major concern in the context of recovered memories.  
• Repression is not the only explanation for forgetting: There are many reasons why someone might not remember a traumatic event, including:
  • Normal forgetting: Details fade over time, especially if the event happened in early childhood.
  • Avoidance: Consciously or unconsciously avoiding thinking about the trauma (suppression).
  • Dissociation: A mental process involving detachment from reality, which can disrupt memory encoding and retrieval during extreme stress.  
  • Childhood amnesia: It’s normal to have limited memories from early childhood (before age 3-4).  
• Caution is crucial: Therapists and the legal system now approach claims of repressed memories with much greater caution due to the potential for false memories and the harm they can cause.

Points to Consider:

• Dissociative Amnesia: Repression as an explanation for memory loss has largely been supplanted by concepts like dissociative amnesia (a condition where memory loss for trauma occurs, but even this is understood as possibly due to extreme stress hormones and state-dependent memory.
  
  It’s worth emphasizing that this is a recognized condition in the DSM-5, involving gaps in memory for traumatic events. However, the mechanisms behind it are still being researched, and it’s not necessarily equivalent to Freudian repression.  
• The complexity of trauma: Trauma is not a monolithic experience. Factors like the age of the individual, the nature of the trauma, and individual differences in coping can influence how memory is affected.  
• Ongoing research: While the simplistic notion of repression has been challenged, research on memory, trauma, and dissociation continues to evolve. There may be subtle ways in which unconscious processes influence memory, but these are likely far more complex than Freud’s original concept.

3. Alternative Explanations:

Modern psychology offers other frameworks to explain why people sometimes don’t remember or don’t feel upsetting things, without invoking Freud’s exact model.

Dissociation

Dissociation is a process where a person mentally disconnects from their experience – it’s like a psychological escape hatch during trauma.

A dissociating person might feel unreal, separated from their body, or in a dreamlike state.

In extreme cases, dissociation can lead to dissociative amnesia, where the person cannot recall parts of the traumatic event, not because of a deliberate repression, but because the mind was in an altered state during the trauma.

Unlike classic repression, truly dissociated memories typically cannot be recovered at will (they may be permanently lost or only return in fragmentary ways)​.

Critics point out that some reports of repressed memory might actually be instances of dissociation, or simply normal forgetting.

Suppression and Avoidance

People often choose not to think about things that upset them – for example, someone might steer their thoughts away whenever a painful memory intrudes.

Over time, this conscious avoidance can make the memory less accessible (since we’re not rehearsing it), which might feel like it was repressed when in fact it was an active albeit subtle choice not to remember.

Cognitive psychology research on thought suppression has shown that telling people to suppress a thought can indeed reduce their ability to recall that information later, though paradoxically it can also cause intrusive thoughts in some cases (the “white bear” effect)​.

While Freud might call that repression at work, cognitive scientists might attribute it to attentional processes or prior conditioning.

Emotional Avoidance

The concept of emotional avoidance or experiential avoidance helps understand how people may avoid certain thoughts, feelings, or situations that trigger distress.

This framework is often used in therapies like CBT or acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) by teaching the person to tolerate and accept those experiences instead of avoiding them.

4. Evidence of Repression or Its Effects:

Overall, the research on motivated forgetting provides some evidence that the mind can actively suppress unwanted memories.

While this doesn’t definitively prove Freud’s theory of repression, it does suggest that there are mechanisms in the brain that can limit access to certain memories.

Further research is needed to explore the relationship between motivated forgetting, unconscious repression, and their implications for mental health and well-being.

• Motivated Forgetting: This refers to the phenomenon where people intentionally or unintentionally try to forget unwanted memories. Research using techniques like the “think/no-think” paradigm has shown that people can indeed suppress memories, leading to reduced recall.  
• Repressive Coping Style: Individuals with a repressive coping style (those who tend to avoid negative thoughts and emotions) seem to be more effective at motivated forgetting. This aligns with the idea that some degree of “tuning out” unpleasant memories might be adaptive for mental well-being.
• Conscious vs. Unconscious: It’s important to distinguish between conscious suppression and unconscious repression. The research on motivated forgetting primarily focuses on conscious efforts to forget, while repression is theorized to be an unconscious process.
• Memory Inhibition: The findings suggest that the brain has mechanisms to inhibit memory retrieval, which could be seen as analogous to repression. However, the exact neural mechanisms and their relationship to unconscious repression are still unclear.

Additional Considerations:

• Individual Differences: The effectiveness of motivated forgetting likely varies across individuals and depends on factors like the nature of the memory, emotional regulation skills, and overall psychological well-being.
• Ethical Implications: The ability to intentionally suppress memories raises ethical questions about its potential misuse, such as in suppressing evidence of wrongdoing or manipulating personal narratives.
• Therapeutic Applications: Understanding motivated forgetting could have implications for therapeutic interventions, particularly for individuals with trauma or anxiety disorders.

Sources

• Baumeister, R. F., Dale, K., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: Reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 1081-1124.
• Boag, S. (2020). Repression (defense mechanism). In Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 4425-4428). Springer, Springer Nature.
• Cramer, P. (2015). Defense mechanisms: 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(2), 114-122.
• Erskine, J., Kvavilashvili, L., Myers, L., Leggett, S., Davies, S., Hiskey, S., … & Georgiou, G. (2016). A longitudinal investigation of repressive coping and ageing. Aging & mental health, 20(10), 1010-1020.
• Freud, A. (1937). The Ego and the mechanisms of defense, London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
• Freud, S. (1894). The neuro-psychoses of defence. SE, 3: 41-61.
• Freud, S. (1896). Further remarks on the neuro-psychoses of defense. SE, 3: 157-185.
• Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis. Pp. xi + 240.
• Freud, S. (1936). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 5(1), 1-28.
• Prasertsri, N., Holden, J., Keefe, F. J., & Wilkie, D. J. (2011). Repressive coping style: Relationships with depression, pain, and pain coping strategies in lung cancer out patients. Lung cancer, 71(2), 235-240.
• Rofé, Y. (2008). Does repression exist? Memory, pathogenic, unconscious and clinical evidence. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 63-85.