Emotion Focused Therapy

Emotion-focused therapy (EFT) is a humanistic approach to psychotherapy. It holds that emotions are central to a person’s sense of self and ability to make healthy choices.

EFT assumes that lacking emotional awareness or avoiding difficult emotions can be harmful by depriving people of important information emotions provide.

EFT therapists help clients tune in to their emotions and use adaptive emotions to guide their behavior. Clients also learn to manage maladaptive emotions.

EFT Theory and Emotion Schemes

EFT is collaborative: therapist and client work as equal partners in interpreting the client’s emotional landscape. The therapist also actively guides the client toward specific emotional tasks (Elliott & Greenberg, 2007).

The theory draws on scientific research into emotion. This includes how emotions arise physiologically, their evolutionary purpose in promoting human functioning and survival, and their connections to cognition and behavior (Greenberg, 2002).

Core to EFT is the concept of “emotion schemes”: networks linking bodily sensations, action urges, ways of thinking, and behavioral tendencies associated with specific emotions (Greenberg & Pascual-Leone, 2006).

EFT helps clients accept and transform personal emotion schemes.

A scheme fires as one automatic package. Reasoning alone rarely changes it. The task is to help clients access the scheme and put it into words, which EFT calls symbolizing. They then reorganize it. The same trigger then activates a healthier response.

This is the basis of EFT’s signature move: changing emotion with emotion (Pascual-Leone, 2018). Instead of arguing a painful feeling away, the therapist helps the client access a different, more adaptive feeling that transforms it.

Types of Emotion in EFT

EFT sorts emotions along two dimensions (Greenberg, 2002; Elliott & Greenberg, 2007). The first separates primary from secondary emotions.

A primary emotion is the first, most direct response to a situation, such as sadness the instant a loss registers. A secondary emotion is a reaction to that feeling, or one used to influence others or hide the original. Anger masking hurt is a common example.

Secondary emotions say little about the original trigger. Therapy therefore moves past them to the primary emotion underneath.

The second dimension separates adaptive from maladaptive emotions.

An adaptive emotion orients a person to a real need or threat and prompts useful action, such as healthy anger that asserts a violated boundary. A maladaptive emotion is a well-learned but outdated response, often rooted in early experience, such as chronic shame triggered by ordinary criticism.

The distinction guides treatment. Adaptive emotions are accessed and intensified because their message is worth heeding. Maladaptive emotions are explored for their origin and original protective purpose, then transformed.

Example: The Grief Emotion Scheme

Grief is an emotion scheme that involves a complex network of bodily sensations, thoughts, action urges, and behaviors centered on the experience of loss.

For example, when a close friend moves away, the grief scheme fires across four levels at once:

• Body: an empty sadness in the chest.
• Thoughts: no one understands them anymore, and life lacks joy without this friendship.
• Action urge: to withdraw from social connections and ruminate endlessly on what was lost.
• Behaviors: staying at home, looking sadly at old photos, and crying into a pillow.

The grief emotion scheme channels attention towards what is missing rather than present support. It prompts withdrawal rather than engagement. Over time, grief generally subsides as the person emotionally adjusts to the loss.

But initially, the coordinated experience across physical, mental, motivational, and behavioral levels focuses awareness on irreplaceable absence.

Therapy can change that pattern. An emotion-focused therapist helps clients mindfully accept and express their grief while rediscovering underlying needs and more adaptive ways of getting support.

This transforms the maladaptive closed loop of the grief emotion scheme into emotionally attuned action promoting self-care.

EFT Techniques and Interventions

EFT sessions focus on increasing clients’ awareness and acceptance of their emotions.

Building Emotional Awareness

Therapists use empathic, reflective listening to help clients put feelings into words and make meaning of them. EFT calls this symbolizing. Specific “emotion coaching” interventions follow.

Not all empathic responses look alike. They range from empathic understanding, which builds safety, to empathic conjecture. A conjecture is a tentative, explicitly flagged guess at what the client has not yet put into words (Greenberg & Elliott, 1997).

In initial sessions, the goal is to foster emotional awareness. Therapists guide clients through focusing, an exercise adapted from Eugene Gendlin’s work that directs attention to the body’s “felt sense” of an emotion.

Clients then find words and images that capture the feeling accurately.

Dialogues explore different layers of feeling. The aim is to tell primary reactions from secondary responses, including instrumental emotions used to influence others. Mindfulness techniques help clients allow and regulate strong or painful emotions as they surface.

Working With Adaptive and Maladaptive Emotions

Once an emotion is clearly described, the therapist asks what it does. How does it orient the client towards meeting, or not meeting, their needs? The answer shapes what happens next:

• Adaptive emotions: intensified through methods such as chair dialogues, where clients speak between parts of the self. This clarifies the emotion’s message and its power to guide action.
• Maladaptive emotions: explored for their origin stories and self-protective purposes, even as their detrimental impacts are acknowledged.
• Transformation: clients access alternate underlying emotions that promote health and self-care, or directly meet the unfulfilled needs perpetuating distress.

Nearly every maladaptive pattern made sense where it was first learned, even though it no longer serves the person.

Changing emotion with emotion creates new action urges. Clients can then behave differently in triggering situations.

Emotion transformation is reinforced through practicing coping thoughts and making step-by-step plans to break dysfunctional patterns connected to harmful feelings. Support continues throughout. In all phases, the therapist provides empathy, validation, and guidance to sustain the client’s motivation and hope.

Chair Work: Two-Chair and Empty-Chair Dialogues

Chair work is EFT’s most recognizable technique. It was adapted from Gestalt therapy, which shares EFT’s experiential, here-and-now style.

Two-Chair Dialogue: Self-Critical Splits

The two-chair dialogue is used when a client shows a self-evaluative split. One part of the self, a harsh "should" voice, attacks another part: the client’s felt, experiencing self.

The client moves between two chairs. In the first, they voice the critical side fully: what it says, in what tone, and by what standard.

In the second, they answer as the criticized side, voicing its hurt, fear, or counter-assertion.

Each side’s underlying need and emotion becomes visible.

The aim is a softening: the critic becomes less harsh and more compassionate, or the experiencing self asserts a need the critic had been overriding.

Greenberg (1979) described two kinds of split. In a conflict split, one part of the self opposes another. In an attribution split, blame is externalized onto a part of the self that feels separate.

Later work identified a self-interruptive split, in which one part blocks the expression of an emotion or need belonging to another (Greenberg et al., 1993).

Empty-Chair Work: Unfinished Business

Empty-chair work addresses unfinished business with a significant other. This is often someone who caused an unresolved injury and who is absent, deceased, or unsafe to confront.

The client speaks to an empty chair representing that person, voicing feelings and needs never expressed. They may also sit in the other chair to voice the person’s likely reply.

The goal is an internal shift, not reconciliation. The client comes to hold previously unmet needs and unexpressed emotions in a resolved way.

The comparison group received an active intervention rather than a waitlist, which makes this one of the stronger early EFT outcome studies. Its main limitation is sample size, with several dozen clients.

A follow-up study asked what resolution looks like inside the session. Clients who voiced unmet needs to the imagined other and began to see that person differently had better outcomes (Greenberg & Malcolm, 2002). That in-session marker predicted outcome better than the therapeutic alliance.

Chair work has since spread beyond EFT. Narrative reviews describe its use in cognitive-behavioral therapy and schema therapy (Pugh, 2017; Pugh & Rae, 2019).

Applications: Depression, Anxiety and Trauma

Attempting unsuccessfully to control emotions can worsen many mental health issues.

EFT may alleviate conditions where avoidance or disproportionate responses are central by reframing emotions as valuable insights rather than to-be-suppressed states.

EFT was first applied to depression, and later anxiety disorders, trauma, eating disorders, borderline personality disorder, relationship problems, and more.

Researchers have since tested EFT across several presentations:

• Anxiety: exploratory studies in generalized anxiety (Timulak et al., 2017) and social anxiety (Shahar et al., 2017) reported encouraging results. See our guide to EFT for generalized anxiety disorder.
• Trauma: studies of adult survivors of child abuse use empty-chair work (Paivio & Nieuwenhuis, 2001; Paivio et al., 2010). Deeper experiencing and a strong alliance together predict better outcomes (Harrington et al., 2021).
• Eating disorders: chair work targets the split between a harshly self-critical, restriction-driving voice and the client’s own needs (Pugh & Rae, 2019).
• Borderline presentations: a 2025 theoretical proof of concept reframes personality disorders as emotional disorders and adapts EFT’s goals for them (Kramer & Timulak, 2025).
• Offenders: a three-year outcome study of incarcerated offenders convicted of intimate partner violence reported measurable change (Pascual-Leone et al., 2011).
• Autistic adults: a small, uncontrolled nine-week group study reported large gains in observer-rated emotional processing (Robinson & Elliott, 2026).

EFT is generally contraindicated for impulse control issues. It also requires client honesty and compassionate self-examination.

While not focused on symptom reduction per se, EFT shows empirical support in enabling adaptive emotional awareness and regulation across presenting issues.

Emotionally Focused Therapy for Couples

Emotionally Focused Therapy for couples (EFT-C) is related but distinct. Sue Johnson and Leslie Greenberg developed it from an early comparison of experiential and problem-solving interventions for marital conflict (Johnson & Greenberg, 1985; Greenberg & Johnson, 1988).

Individual EFT rests on emotion-scheme theory and targets one person’s emotion processing. EFT-C rests on adult attachment theory and targets the cycle of interaction between partners.

That cycle is self-reinforcing. One partner’s anxious pursuit of reassurance, for example, meets the other’s defensive withdrawal, which intensifies the pursuit.

As Sue Johnson explains, emotion in a relationship "becomes the music of their interactional dance". In her view, that underlying rhythm matters more to a couple’s distress than the surface content of any argument.

EFT-C moves through three broad stages:

1. De-escalation: the therapist helps the couple name their negative cycle and see the cycle, not either partner, as the shared problem. This lowers reactivity and defensiveness.
2. Restructuring interactions: partners express vulnerable emotions and unmet attachment needs, such as fear of abandonment, that sit beneath anger or withdrawal.
3. Consolidation and integration: the couple practices the new patterns of responsiveness and reflects on the changed story of their relationship.

The goal is a more secure attachment bond between two people, not the transformation of one person’s emotion scheme. A brief adaptation applies the same logic to parents of children and adolescents with mental health difficulties (Foroughe et al., 2019).

Effectiveness and Evidence

EFT is widely described as an evidence-based approach, though its trial base is smaller than CBT’s and of uneven quality. Reviews of humanistic-experiential therapies find them broadly comparable to other major therapies across a range of problems (Elliott et al., 2021).

Individual EFT: Trials and Real-World Evidence

Process research links deeper, more productive emotional processing in EFT sessions to better outcomes (Watson & Bedard, 2006). More recent work asks whether EFT works outside trials.

With no comparison group, this design cannot isolate EFT’s active ingredient. It does show that trial gains largely carry over to routine practice, at a smaller size.

The authors also flag publication bias and largely poor-quality trials, with small samples and inadequate randomization. The wide interval therefore reflects a genuine evidence gap, not a settled null result.

Disorder-specific work points the same way. A feasibility trial comparing EFT with CBT for generalized anxiety found large improvements in both, sustained at six months.

Dropout was 10% for EFT and 27% for CBT, though that difference was not statistically significant. The authors called EFT a promising candidate for a properly powered trial (Timulak et al., 2022).

Clients themselves report mostly positive experiences.

A qualitative meta-analysis of 11 studies found chair work and intense emotional work were commonly experienced as helpful. A minority of clients also found aspects difficult or unhelpful (Marren et al., 2022).

Emotionally Focused Therapy for Couples: Meta-Analytic Evidence

Including dissertations and quasi-experimental studies adds statistical power but also uneven study quality.

Smaller syntheses agree. EFT-C and behavioral couples therapy looked broadly comparable (Rathgeber et al., 2019), and a review of EFT-C’s first 19 years reached a similarly positive verdict (Beasley & Ager, 2019).

What Clients Say About EFT

Nødtvedt et al. (2019) interviewed 18 clients about three months after time-limited EFT for depression, anxiety, or self-criticism. Several described feeling genuinely attended to.

"You feel they have a heart and are not afraid to show that they have it. And that they care."

"I was listened to. I felt that when I cried, she almost sat there and cried together with me."

Others felt less alone with emotions that had seemed shameful or isolating, the clinical target of EFT’s work on maladaptive shame.

"I think it had something to do with not being alone with your emotions – that somebody is there and sees it."

These accounts fit EFT’s own claim that the relational conditions inherited from person-centered therapy are necessary, though not sufficient on their own.

Limitations of EFT

EFT’s limitations come partly from its clinical logic and partly from what it shares with other experiential therapies:

1. Excessive Reactivity: a poor fit when the core problem is already excessive emotional reactivity, such as panic attacks or impulse control disorders.
2. Honest Engagement: EFT relies on honest self-examination and a compassionate stance toward emotions. Manipulative, deceptive, or hostile clients are unlikely to benefit.
3. Indirect Symptom Relief: EFT improves overall emotional relating rather than targeting acute symptoms, so clients wanting rapid, marked symptom reduction may prefer other approaches.
4. Verbal Expression: the emphasis on articulating emotion in words and imagery will not suit clients who express emotion through art, movement, or music.
5. Temporary Destabilization: exploring emotionally laden issues can unsettle clients before it helps, so extra support may be needed.
6. Younger Model: EFT is young among therapies, so training and dissemination lag behind CBT and psychodynamic approaches.

Excessive Emotional Reactivity

EFT’s core strategy is to help clients access, tolerate, and express emotion. Sometimes that is the wrong move. If the underlying problem is already excessive, poorly regulated reactivity, more access can make things worse.

Take panic attacks. The problem is catastrophic misinterpretation of bodily arousal, which needs correcting rather than fuller access. In impulse control difficulties, intensifying emotional experience risks intensifying the very urges treatment aims to contain.

The encouragement to turn towards and accept all internal experiences could therefore exacerbate symptoms driven by exaggerated reactivity. The limit is structural, not a matter of clinician skill.

Even for other clients, evoking intense material can leave people feeling worse before they feel better. Clients with fragile coping resources or weak outside support need careful pacing and, sometimes, a different first treatment.

Indirect Route to Symptom Relief

EFT targets overall emotional processing and relational functioning. It does not aim at rapid reduction of one specific symptom. Improved well-being often brings relief as a byproduct.

Some clients want the fastest possible relief from one circumscribed symptom, such as a phobia or compulsion. A narrower approach, such as exposure therapy or exposure and response prevention, may serve them better.

While shown effective as a short-term treatment of under 30 sessions, longer-term or open-ended therapy is not uncommon. EFT must adapt traditional timeframes to each case.

The evidence is also thinner than for CBT. Disorder-specific trials are few and small, and real-world effects run smaller than trial effects (Kramer et al., 2025).

The most comprehensive synthesis so far finds EFT comparable to, not better than, other active therapies (Whittington et al., 2026).

Training and Dissemination

EFT is a young therapy. It was formally systematized from the late 1970s, so it remains less widely taught than CBT or psychodynamic approaches.

Its individual evidence base is real and growing, but smaller in total trial volume than CBT’s.

That reflects maturity and infrastructure, not demonstrated efficacy where head-to-head or naturalistic data exist. Access is the practical cost. Well-trained EFT clinicians are harder to find in many healthcare systems.

One attempt to close the gap taught trainees to use psychotherapy process measures before conventional empathic-reflection and intervention skills.

The aim was to help them spot clinically significant in-session moments earlier. The results were encouraging. But it was a single, relatively small trial (Pascual-Leone & Andreescu, 2013).

Meanwhile, EFT’s orientation matches cultural trends favoring emotional awareness and mindfulness.

History and Development of EFT

EFT founder Leslie Greenberg sought to elucidate how people change, intentionally developing the approach over 30 years (Goldman, 2019).

Beginning publishing in 1979, EFT integrates person-centered, cognitive-behavioral, Gestalt, and problem-solving frameworks, along with systemic perspectives when applied to couples.

It centers on compassionately understanding one’s own emotions to improve overall well-being and relationships. The name causes confusion. Emotionally focused therapy for couples is a related but separate approach, co-developed by Sue Johnson and Greenberg and grounded in attachment theory (Johnson & Greenberg, 1985).

Nonetheless, intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional attunement likely facilitate one another.

EFT Compared With Other Therapies

EFT grew out of the humanistic tradition but borrows from several others. The table shows where it overlaps with related therapies and where it departs.

Therapy	Shared ground with EFT	Key difference
Person-centered therapy	Empathy, unconditional positive regard, and congruence.	EFT adds active, marker-guided tasks. Rogers held the conditions were sufficient.
Gestalt therapy	Experiential and here-and-now; source of the chair techniques.	EFT adds emotion-scheme theory and a sustained programme of outcome research.
Cognitive-behavioral therapy	Directly compared in process-outcome research.	CBT treats thought as the lever. EFT treats emotion as primary information.
Psychodynamic therapy	Earlier experience shapes present difficulties.	EFT locates change in present-moment emotional experience, not gradual verbal insight.
Dialectical behavior therapy	Emotion regulation is a central target (Linehan, 2015).	DBT uses a biosocial model and cognitive-behavioral skills training.
Narrative therapy	Interest in how self-stories shape distress.	Narrative therapy works through language and re-authoring, not embodied enactment.

Person-Centered Therapy: The Directiveness Difference

EFT keeps person-centered therapy’s belief in the client’s capacity for growth, along with empathy, unconditional positive regard, and therapist congruence.

Carl Rogers held that these conditions were necessary and sufficient for change. The therapist should follow the client’s process, not steer it. EFT rejects the sufficiency claim. It treats the conditions as necessary but not sufficient.

EFT therapists therefore add therapist-directed tasks, such as chair dialogues. They propose each task in response to an in-session marker.

A marker is a client statement or state. It signals a particular emotional-processing opportunity, such as a conflict between two parts of the self (Elliott & Greenberg, 2007; Goldman, 2019).

Elliott and Greenberg (2007) describe this blend of empathic safety and active task facilitation as the essence of the approach.

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: Thought Versus Emotion

CBT treats maladaptive thought as the main lever for changing emotion and behavior, using cognitive restructuring and behavioral experiments.

EFT treats emotion as primary information that argument cannot reach alone.

It works by accessing and transforming the emotion scheme directly, and only secondarily addresses the thoughts embedded in it.

Take a client stuck in shame. CBT would typically test the belief behind the feeling.

EFT would help the client access the shame itself, trace its origin, and transform it, for example with self-compassion or legitimate anger at mistreatment.

Researchers have compared them directly (Watson & Bedard, 2006).

Chair work, first systematized in EFT, has since been absorbed into CBT practice (Pugh, 2017). The traditions rest on different theories of change but are not wholly incompatible.

References

Beasley, C. C., & Ager, R. (2019). Emotionally focused couples therapy: A systematic review of its effectiveness over the past 19 years. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 16(2), 144-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2018.1563013

Elliott, R., & Greenberg, L. S. (2007). The essence of process-experiential/emotion-focused therapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 61(3), 241-254.

Elliott, R., Watson, J., Timulak, L., & Sharbanee, J. (2021). Research on humanistic-experiential psychotherapies: Updated review. In M. Barkham, W. Lutz, & L. Castonguay (Eds.), Bergin & Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (7th ed.). Wiley.

Foroughe, M., Stillar, A., Goldstein, L., Dolhanty, J., Goodcase, E.T., & Lafrance, A. (2019). Brief emotion focused family therapy: An intervention for parents of children and adolescents with mental health issues. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 45, 410-430.

Goldman, R. N. (2019). History and overview of emotion-focused therapy. In L. S. Greenberg & R. N. Goldman (Eds.), Clinical handbook of emotion-focused therapy (pp. 3-35). American Psychological Association.

Greenberg, L. S. (1979). Resolving splits: Use of the two chair technique. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085895

Greenberg, L. S. (2002). Emotion-focused therapy: Coaching clients to work through their feelings. American Psychological Association.

Greenberg, L. S., & Elliott, R. (1997). Varieties of empathic responding. In A. C. Bohart & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 167-186). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10226-007

Greenberg, L. S., & Goldman, R. N. (Eds.). (2019). Clinical handbook of emotion-focused therapy. American Psychological Association.

Greenberg, L. S., & Johnson, S. M. (1988). Emotionally focused therapy for couples. Guilford Press.

Greenberg, L. S., & Malcolm, W. (2002). Resolving unfinished business: Relating process to outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.70.2.406

Greenberg, L. S., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2006). Emotion in psychotherapy: A practice-friendly research review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 611-630.

Greenberg, L. S., Rice, L. N., & Elliott, R. (1993). Facilitating emotional change: The moment-by-moment process. Guilford Press.

Harrington, S., Pascual-Leone, A., Paivio, S., Edmondstone, C., & Baher, T. (2021). Depth of experiencing and therapeutic alliance: What predicts outcome for whom in emotion-focused therapy for trauma? Psychology and Psychotherapy, 94, 895-914.

Hayes, S. C., Hofmann, S. G., Stanton, C. E., Carpenter, J. K., Sanford, B. T., Curtiss, J. E., & Ciarrochi, J. (2019). The role of the individual in the coming era of process-based therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 117, 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.005

Johnson, S. (n.d.). An interview with Sue Johnson, EdD [Interview by V. Yalom]. Psychotherapy.net.

Johnson, S. M., & Greenberg, L. S. (1985). Differential effects of experiential and problem-solving interventions in resolving marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.2.175

Kramer, U., Sutter, M., Rubel, J., Blanco Machinea, J., Woldarsky, C., Auszra, L., Herrmann, I., & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2025). Effectiveness of emotion-focused therapy: Main results of a practice-research network study. Psychotherapy Research, 36(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2454455

Kramer, U., & Timulak, L. (2025). Emotion-focused therapy for personality disorders: A proof of concept. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 56(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-025-09709-2

Linehan, M. (2015). DBT skills training manual (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Marren, C., Mikoška, P., O’Brien, S., & Timulak, L. (2022). A qualitative meta-analysis of the clients’ experiences of emotion-focused therapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 29(5), 1611-1625. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2745

Nødtvedt, Ø. O., Binder, P.-E., Stige, S. H., Schanche, E., Stiegler, J. R., & Hjeltnes, A. (2019). “You feel they have a heart and are not afraid to show it”: Exploring how clients experience the therapeutic relationship in emotion-focused therapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1996. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01996

Paivio, S. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (1995). Resolving “unfinished business”: Efficacy of experiential therapy using empty-chair dialogue. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(3), 419-425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.3.419

Paivio, S. C., & Nieuwenhuis, J. A. (2001). Efficacy of emotion focused therapy for adult survivors of child abuse: A preliminary study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14, 115-133.

Paivio, S. C., Jarry, J. L., Chagigiorgis, H., Hall, I., & Ralston, M. (2010). Efficacy of two versions of emotion-focused therapy for resolving child abuse trauma. Psychotherapy Research, 20, 353-366.

Pascual-Leone, A. (2018). How clients “change emotion with emotion”: A programme of research on emotional processing. Psychotherapy Research, 28(2), 165-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1349350

Pascual-Leone, A., & Andreescu, C. (2013). Repurposing process measures to train psychotherapists: Training outcomes using a new approach. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 13, 210-219.

Pascual-Leone, A., & Nardone, S. (2023). Emotion-focused therapy. In J. C. Norcross and M. A. Seligman (Eds.), Handbook of clinical psychology (6th ed.). Guilford Press.

Pascual-Leone, A., Bierman, R., Arnold, R., & Stasiak, E. (2011). Emotion-focused therapy for incarcerated offenders of intimate partner violence: A 3-year outcome using a new whole-sample matching method. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 331-347.

Pugh, M. (2017). Chairwork in cognitive behavioural therapy: A narrative review. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41, 16-30.

Pugh, M., & Rae, S. (2019). Chairwork in schema therapy: Applications and considerations in the treatment of eating disorders. In S. Simpson & E. Smith (Eds.), Schema therapy for eating disorders: Theory and practice for individual and group settings (pp. 101-120). Routledge.

Rathgeber, M., Bürkner, P.C., Schiller, E.M., & Holling, H. (2019). The efficacy of emotionally focused couples therapy and behavioral couples therapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 45, 447-463.

Robinson, A., & Elliott, R. (2026). Neurodiversity-affirming emotion-focused group therapy: An exploratory outcome study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.70075

Shahar, B., Bar-Kalifa, E., & Alon, E. (2017). Emotion-focused therapy for social anxiety disorder: Results from a multiple-baseline study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(3), 238-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000166

Spengler, P. M., Lee, N. A., Wiebe, S. A., & Wittenborn, A. K. (2024). A comprehensive meta-analysis on the efficacy of emotionally focused couple therapy. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 13(2), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000233

Timulak, L., Keogh, D., Chigwedere, C., Wilson, C., Ward, F., Hevey, D., Griffin, P., Jacobs, L., Hughes, S., Vaughan, C., Beckham, K., & Mahon, S. (2022). A comparison of emotion-focused therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: Results of a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy, 59(1), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000427

Timulak, L., McElvaney, J., Keogh, D., Martin, E., Clare, P., Chepukova, E., & Greenberg, L.S. (2017). Emotion-focused therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: An exploratory study. Psychotherapy, 54, 361-366.

Watson, J. (2019). Role of the therapeutic relationship in emotion-focused therapy. In L. S. Greenberg & R. N. Goldman (Eds.), Clinical handbook of emotion-focused therapy (pp. 111-128). American Psychological Association.

Watson, J. C., & Bedard, D. L. (2006). Clients’ emotional processing in psychotherapy: A comparison between cognitive-behavioral and process-experiential therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(1), 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.1.152

Welling, H. (2012). Transformative emotional sequence: Towards a common principle of change. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 22, 109-136.

Whittington, D. D., Jafari, M., & Borgogna, N. C. (2026). Emotion-focused therapy for distress-based psychopathology in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2026.2650152