Durkheim's Organic Solidarity

Organic solidarity is a concept by the sociologist Émile Durkheim. It describes the type of social bond in modern, complex societies where people depend on each other because everyone has different jobs and roles. Instead of everyone being alike, society functions like a body, with each part performing a specialized function. People are connected through interdependence, not similarity.

Key Takeaways

Durkheim believed that as societies become more complex, the division of labor increases and people become more dependent on each other for survival. This interdependence gives rise to organic solidarity.
Organic solidarity can be seen in any society where there is a high degree of specialization and people are dependent on each other for essential goods and services.
For example, in modern industrial society, people specialize in different occupations (e.g., manufacturing, agriculture, healthcare, finance, etc.) and rely on each other to produce the goods and services they need.

What Is Organic Solidarity In Sociology?

In sociology, organic solidarity is the type of social cohesion that develops in complex, industrial societies, where individuals are connected through mutual dependence rather than similarity.

Unlike simpler societies, where people share the same beliefs and lifestyles, modern societies are structured around different roles and specializations, making interdependence essential.

Émile Durkheim introduced this concept in his foundational work, The Division of Labor in Society (1893).

He contrasted it with mechanical solidarity, which characterizes preindustrial societies where social bonds are based on similarity and shared values.

How Organic Solidarity Works

In industrial societies, no single person can meet all their own needs.

People rely on each other’s skills and labor to function:

For example, steelworkers depend on coal miners for raw materials; farmers rely on transportation workers to deliver crops; teachers depend on healthcare workers for well-being.

This division of labor creates a network of interdependence, forming the backbone of social cohesion.

However, organic solidarity does not mean equality, class divisions and social inequalities can still exist.

Key Features of Organic Solidarity

Mutual Dependence: Social unity comes from the reliance on specialized roles. Each individual depends on others to fulfill essential functions, which strengthens social bonds.
Weakened Consensus: Unlike mechanical solidarity, shared values are less central. People may not identify with each other in the same way, so social integration relies more on practical cooperation than on shared morality.
Nature of Interaction: Interactions are often task-focused, status-oriented, and less personal. Cooperation is driven by practical needs rather than emotional or moral connections.
System of Law: Laws in societies with organic solidarity are formal and focused on restitution (repairing harm) rather than punishment. This reflects the society’s complex social and economic interdependence.
Individual Freedom: Durkheim saw organic solidarity positively, as it allows for both social cohesion and greater individual autonomy. People are connected through their roles without losing personal freedom.

Why It Develops

Organic solidarity is more likely in societies that are:

Technologically advanced: complex tasks require specialization.
Large and diverse: more roles and functions increase interdependence.
Geographically mobile: frequent contact with different people fosters skill-sharing and reliance.

In short, organic solidarity is the social glue of modern industrial societies, holding people together through their differences and mutual reliance, rather than through shared identity or tradition.

Biological Analogy

Durkheim deliberately chose the term organic solidarity based on an analogy with biological organisms.

Just as a living body composed of highly specialized organs must cooperate for the organism to survive, the highly specialized parts of a society based on organic solidarity must cooperate for the society to persist.

The complex economy of industrialized nations, such as the U.S. economy, meets the definition of organic solidarity.

Once a society reaches organic solidarity, Durkheim considered it to have finished its development.

Functions

The function of organic solidarity is to replace the “social glue” of mechanical solidarity (shared values and traditions) with a social framework based on mutual dependence.

Society holds together not because everyone is alike, but because its members need each other to survive and thrive.

This system allows complex societies to maintain order, foster cohesion, and balance individual freedom with collective stability.

Examples

Organic solidarity, a concept developed by Émile Durkheim, describes the social cohesion found in highly advanced, industrial societies.

Unlike preindustrial societies, where unity comes from similarity, organic solidarity arises from mutual dependence created by specialized roles (the division of labour).

Examples of Mutual Interdependence

Healthcare System: Doctors, nurses, lab technicians, and pharmacists all have different roles, but society depends on each of them working together to keep people healthy.
Restaurants: The chef cooks, the waiter serves, and the cleaner keeps the place tidy. Each job is different, but everyone relies on each other to run the restaurant smoothly.
Technology Companies: Programmers write code, designers make the app look good, marketers sell it, and customer service helps users. Each person has a specialized job, but the company works because everyone contributes.
Schools: Teachers teach, principals manage, janitors clean, and cafeteria staff cook. Students rely on all these roles, even though they’re different, to have a functioning school.
Cities: Electricians fix power lines, bus drivers transport people, grocery store workers stock food, and police keep everyone safe. Each role is different, but everyone depends on one another.

Organic Solidarity in a Family

In a family, organic solidarity can be seen in the way each member performs different roles that the others rely on.

For example, one parent might cook meals while another handles repairs around the house and manages the family finances.

An older sibling might help younger siblings with homework or take care of them when the parents are busy, while the younger sibling contributes in smaller ways, such as helping with chores or bringing joy and energy to the household.

Each person’s role is different, but the family functions effectively because everyone depends on each other.

This interdependence is what makes it organic solidarity: cohesion is not based on everyone being the same, but on the fact that each member’s specialized contributions are necessary for the family to run smoothly.

If one member could not perform their role, the family would struggle, just as modern societies depend on specialized roles—like doctors, teachers, and engineers—to function.

Advantages

The key advantages of organic solidarity relate to enhanced social stability through interdependence, increased individual freedom, and the development of formal social regulation:

1. Strong Social Cohesion through Interdependence

Organic solidarity replaces the unity based on likeness (mechanical solidarity) with a powerful form of cohesion rooted in mutual functional dependence.

Everyone Depends on Each Other: In modern societies, people have different roles, like doctors, teachers, engineers, and shop workers. Society works because everyone relies on each other.
Essential for Daily Life: This interdependence makes sure that we have the services we need, such as food, clean water, healthcare, and education.
Keeps Society Stable: Even as life changes quickly, society stays stable because people know they need each other to survive. Cooperation and compromise are necessary, so people follow the rules and work together.

2. More Individual Freedom

A significant advantage of organic solidarity is the increased scope for individuality and diversity, a development Durkheim found valuable despite the associated risks.

Acceptance of Differences: People can have different jobs, beliefs, and lifestyles without being punished for not fitting in.
Freedom to Be Yourself: Weakening old traditions gives people more freedom to think, act, and live in their own way.
Tolerance: Modern societies generally accept more diversity in beliefs and behavior than traditional societies.

3. Clear Rules and Laws

Modern societies need formal rules to manage all the complex interactions between people.

Formalized Laws: Rules are written down and organized, helping society run smoothly.
Restitution over Punishment: Laws focus on fixing problems and making amends rather than only punishing people.
A Mature Society: Durkheim thought that reaching this stage of organic solidarity was the final step in society’s development, creating a well-functioning and fair system.

The shift to organic solidarity represents a transformation where integration occurs not through shared likeness, but through functional difference, enabling highly complex economies and societies to function efficiently while accommodating individual choice and specialization.

Disadvantages

While organic solidarity allows large, modern societies to function efficiently, it also brings weaker moral bonds, social isolation, competition, and psychological stress.

People gain freedom, but they may lose the guidance, support, and connectedness that traditional communities once provided.

1. Weaker Social Bonds

Organic solidarity weakens the shared values and close ties that held traditional societies together.

Less Agreement Between People: People in modern societies are less likely to share the same beliefs and values, making them less connected.
Impersonal Relationships: Interactions are often practical rather than personal. People may only know each other for work or specific goals, not because of friendship or community.
Loss of Community: Individuals focus more on their own goals, so neighbourhoods and communities are less tight-knit.
Decline of Traditional Institutions: Families, religion, and other traditional institutions are less powerful in guiding behavior, leaving people less connected to society.

2. Anomie (Feeling of Normlessness)

A major problem of organic solidarity is anomie, a state where society’s rules and shared values are unclear or weak.

What Anomie Means: “Without law” – people are unsure how to behave because society’s shared rules are missing or confusing.
Psychological Effects: People may feel lost, anxious, or unsure about what is right or wrong.
Self-Interest Rises: Without strong moral guidance, people focus more on themselves than on helping others.
Causes: Rapid social change, like new technology or industrialization, can disrupt traditional rules and expectations, making anomie more likely.

3. Higher Crime and Deviance

Weak social bonds and anomie can lead to more crime and anti-social behavior.

Less Respect for Rules: People in modern societies may feel less bound by laws or social norms.
Deviance is More Likely: With less shared morality, behavior that was once unacceptable may be tolerated.
Strain Between Goals and Means: When people are encouraged to achieve success (like wealth or status) but don’t have the means, frustration can lead to crime or deviant behavior.

4. Competition and Impersonal Relationships

The specialization that comes with organic solidarity can also have negative effects.

Focus on Achievement: Status comes from education, job, or success, not family or tradition, which increases competition.
Social Inequality and Risk: Wealth and opportunities tend to concentrate at the top, while risks fall on those at the bottom.
Impersonal Interactions: Relationships often become transactional—based on what others can do for you—rather than emotional or personal.
Potential Family Problems: Highly specialized nuclear families may struggle to support children fully, potentially leading to anti-social behavior or underachievement.
Conflict of Roles: Jobs and qualifications can clash with traditional family or community expectations, creating stress or tension.

Organic Solidarity vs Mechanical Solidarity

Organic solidarity and mechanical solidarity explain how societies stay together (social solidarity) as they change from simple, traditional communities to complex, industrial ones.

Durkheim said social cohesion comes from a society’s structure, especially how work is divided.

By comparing mechanical and organic solidarity, we can see how different societies maintain order in different ways.

Quick Comparison Table

Feature	Mechanical Solidarity (MS)	Organic Solidarity (OS)
Type of Society	Preindustrial, small communities (villages, hunter-gatherers)	Industrial, large, modern societies (cities, industrial nations)
Basis of Unity	Shared beliefs, values, and traditions. People are bonded by what they are.	Mutual dependence. People are bonded by what they do (specialized roles).
Division of Labour	Minimal. Most people do the same kind of work.	Highly specialized. Everyone has a different role.
Social Integration	Strong sense of belonging and community.	Weaker consensus. People rely on practicality, not shared morality.
Individualism	Low. Group comes before the individual.	High. Individual freedom and personal choice grow.
Law	Repressive (punishments and strict sanctions).	Restitutive (making amends, formal laws for contracts and property).
Analogy	Like parts of a simple machine or community (Gemeinschaft).	Like organs in a body or association (Gesellschaft).

Key Differences Explained

1. Source of Unity

Mechanical Solidarity: People feel connected because they share the same beliefs, traditions, and daily routines. Everyone behaves in similar ways, and the group is more important than the individual.
Organic Solidarity: People feel connected because they depend on each other. A teacher relies on farmers, farmers rely on doctors, and so on. Unity comes from practical cooperation, not shared values.

2. Role of the Division of Labour

Mechanical Solidarity: Most people do similar work, like farming or blacksmithing. Life experiences and thinking patterns are similar, reinforcing shared values.
Organic Solidarity: Work is highly specialized. Society relies on many different skills working together, creating interdependence.

3. Social Structure and Laws

Mechanical Societies: Social rules are enforced by tradition and close community ties. Breaking a rule affects the whole community, so punishment is often severe.
Organic Societies: Moral ties are weaker, so formal laws are needed. Laws focus on making amends (restitution) rather than revenge. They regulate complex interactions in society.

4. Historical Context and Consequences

Durkheim believed societies move from mechanical to organic solidarity as they industrialize and grow.

Mechanical solidarity keeps strong bonds but limits freedom.
Organic solidarity allows more individual freedom while still maintaining social cohesion through interdependence.
Rapid change can cause anomie, a state where shared norms are unclear. This can lead to higher crime or deviance until new norms are established.

References

Alpert, H. (1940). Emile Durkheim and the theory of social integration. J. Soc. Phil., 6, 172.

Deliege, R. (2001). Societies, Types of. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.

Durkheim, E. (1893). The division of labor in society. The Free Press, New York. Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide [1897]. na. Durkheim, E. (2010). From mechanical to organic solidarity. Sociology: Introductory Readings, 2 (1).

Giddens, A. (1971). Durkheim”s political sociology. The sociological review, 19 (4), 477-519.

Malinowski, B. (1926). Myth in primitive psychology (Vol. 6). K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company, Limited.

Merton, R. K. (1994, March). Durkheim”s division of labor in society. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 17-25). Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers.

Ritzer, G. (1992). Sociological Theory. McGraw-Hill.

Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations [1776] (Vol. 11937). na.

Durkheim’s Organic Solidarity