Intimacy to a man is usually a blend of emotional closeness and physical touch: feeling understood, trusted, and safe with a partner. What it means to a particular man depends on his personality, upbringing, attachment style, and socialization.
Key Takeaways
- Meaning: For the men interviewed, intimacy meant closeness, trust, understanding, affection, touch, and sex, with no single factor outranking the rest.
- Physical Touch: Sex and touch mattered, but the men described them as one part of intimacy, not all of it.
- Emotional Needs: Like women, men want to feel cared for, understood, and safe with a partner.
- Barriers: The “boys don’t cry” narrative, fear of seeming weak, and upbringing can make opening up harder.
- Building It: Ask what he needs, listen well, share experiences, and let him open up at his own pace.
- Verdict: ✅ Supported, with limits — research leans towards intimacy being more than sex, though much of it only watched couples.
One of the men I spoke to said, “What intimacy means is a personal thing. Saying “this is what men think intimacy is” is a huge generalization.”
Do Men Only Want Physical Intimacy?
There is a widespread generalization that men put a lot more importance on the physical side of intimacy than women.
Society has historically expected men to be strong and emotionless, and “toxic masculinity” teaches us that a man is weak when he shows emotions and talks about his feelings.
The old “boys don’t cry” narrative.
This way of thinking may create a vicious cycle:
- Silence: Men may feel they cannot express themselves authentically.
- Fear: They struggle to open up because they worry they’ll be perceived as weak and, therefore, “less manly”.
- Suppression: They may suppress their emotions and focus more on sex to feel intimate.
- Result: That perpetuates the stereotype that men are “only interested in the sex” and “don’t have any emotions”.
Or maybe it’s true. Most men are naturally inclined to favor physical intimacy over emotional, spiritual, intellectual, and experiential types of intimacy.
What do men have to say about this? Does their idea of intimacy involve all aspects of intimacy? Or are they only interested in sex, as is commonly believed?
I spoke to eight guys about what intimacy means to them, what makes them feel more intimate, and what gets in the way of intimacy. Here’s a summary of their responses.
Eight men cannot speak for all men, so read their answers as individual experiences, not research findings.
What Enhances Intimacy for Men?
Intimacy encompasses closeness, trust, understanding, connection, familiarity, mutual affection, physical touch, and sex.
All these factors mattered to the men I spoke to. For most of them, no single factor was more valuable than the others: true intimacy contains them all.

Physical Touch and Sex
It’s commonly believed that for men, sex and emotional connection are separate things.
However, the men I spoke to think that sex and physical closeness are important for intimacy, and I’m sure it’s the same for many women.
Ricky said, “Sex is important. It’s always special to get intimate with someone you love.”
Marlin agreed, “For me, intimacy is about feeling physically connected with someone. Physical touch is definitely one of my love languages.”
Why is sex important?
In Jason’s opinion, “When bodies work together and match each other, that feels very intimate because you’re in tune with each other.”
Andy thinks it’s about vulnerability, “You’re vulnerable when you’re having sex with someone, so it creates a kind of connection and familiarity.
But it’s more than sex, it’s also things like being the small spoon or the leaner on the sofa.”
He added, “But of course, a random, joyous, and intense sexual experience is incredibly intimate.”
Eric had a different opinion, “Honestly, I don’t think sex is necessary for intimacy at all. It’s taken a long time for me to understand that intimacy doesn’t require sex. Really, it’s a porn problem because, subconsciously, it cheapens intimacy and suppresses the emotions you need to really connect with someone and experience real intimacy.”
It’s true that watching too much porn (especially of a certain type) is unhealthy on many levels, including for your ability to experience intimacy by having sex. In most porn, sex is just entertainment and depicted as a purely physical thing.
Sex is, of course, a physical act, but from my conversations, it’s clear that men do appreciate the emotional and spiritual closeness sex can bring.
So maybe we can conclude that “Intimacy is way beyond sex – but of course, that’s part of it too,” as Rasheed put it.
Sex, Eroticism, and Imagination
Esther Perel is a couples and family therapist. She is the author of Mating in Captivity. She says only humans have an erotic life rather than simply a sexual one.
Eroticism, she explains, is sexuality “transformed by the human imagination”. Its ingredients are aliveness, curiosity, and creativity, not frequency.
Couples who say their sex life has gone quiet, Perel says, are usually asking for better sex, not more of it.
She also names a paradox. Good intimacy does not guarantee good sex. The needs behind safety, such as predictability and stability, can pull against the needs behind excitement, such as novelty and mystery. Perel calls reconciling them “the paradox that you manage”.
One account of why is that passion tracks how fast intimacy is growing, not how high it is. As a relationship settles, passion can fade even while closeness keeps deepening[1].
Beyond the Physical
All the men I spoke to put a lot of emphasis on the non-physical aspects of intimacy.
Brendan summarized this well when he said, “Real intimacy is about creating a deep connection that goes beyond the physical aspects.”
A few themes that emerged were:
- Familiarity: Feeling at ease enough to be yourself, without hiding or worrying about being judged.
- Care and Understanding: Having a partner who listens, supports you, and is on your side.
- Sharing: Closeness grows through shared emotions, private fears, and time spent doing things together.
- Safety and Trust: Feeling safe with someone makes it easier to share your inner world.
- Self-Intimacy: Being comfortable in your own company, which may be the base for closeness with others.
Familiarity
Familiarity is feeling at ease enough to be yourself, without hiding, performing, or worrying about being judged. It shows up as laughing together, being silly together, and letting a partner see your unguarded side.
As Jason put it, “Being at ease and being able to just be myself without worrying or hiding anything. You make each other laugh, and you’re silly together. Letting one rip in front of your partner is true intimacy!”
Feeling Cared for and Understood
Men want to feel cared for and understood, just like women do too.
Their specific needs may be different. Naturally, they vary from person to person. But all the men I spoke to touched on this theme.
Eric said, “Intimacy to me is to be held and soothed, being seen for who I am and how far I’ve come.
It’s about bringing me back to the moment, taking me away from fear and worry about the world.”
For Brendan, it was obvious. Although men might not say so, they also want emotional closeness, and need to feel accepted and appreciated.
He said, “Men want to be emotionally supported and understood, just like women do.”
Jason described it as mutual support.
“It’s about being there for one another, going through the good and the bad times, feeling like someone is your close confidant who is there to help you.”
Rasheed added, “Bringing me peace and taking an interest in my interests. It’s also about understanding boundaries and tough decisions – respect. And little things like getting me meds when I’m sick.”
Having empathy and listening was important to Keenan, who said, “You need to feel like your partner really cares about what you’re saying and actually listens. I need to feel supported and like my partner is on my side no matter what.”
Why does feeling understood matter so much? Reis and Shaver’s[2] interpersonal process model says intimacy is built moment by moment, in a two-part cycle.
One partner discloses something personal, such as a fear or an opinion. The other responds in a way the first person sees as understanding, validating, and caring.
Disclosure alone does not create closeness. The response does the work. That is one reason talking more does not reliably deepen a relationship if the reply does not land as genuine care.
It fits what Keenan described: feeling that a partner really listens and is on his side.
Sharing Emotions and Experiences
Another theme that arose was that sharing emotions and experiences can make a man feel closer to his partner. Here’s what the men I spoke to said:
- “Cooking meals for us, chatting for hours about random things, and making me laugh.”
- “Sharing things that you wouldn’t necessarily share with others. Private things like your fears and doubts, the ups and downs of life, and encouraging one another.”
- “Shared experiences. I feel closest to her when we do things together.”
“Intimacy is also all the gossip and knowledge you learn about others like their family, friends, and work. The stuff that goes deep. You must be mixed up in each other’s business, like Ribena and water, to experience that real intimacy.”
- “Shared experiences and spending quality time together make intimacy easier to achieve and maintain.”
- “Missing someone is intimate. Those thoughts you have about what you’ve shared are very intimate.”
Safety and Trust
It was clear from the responses that men (like women) need to feel safe to be able to share their inner world with another person.
Marlin said, “When I trust someone, that brings out a want in me to be intimate with them.”
I asked Ricky whether he finds intimacy difficult. His answer: “As long as I trust that person, I don’t find it difficult to share my emotions with them.”
Men also seek safety and comfort from their partners. It’s a tough world out there, and knowing that someone has your back is as important to men as it is to women.
As Eric said, “When I don’t feel good enough or when I’m anxious, I seek closeness and want my partner to lift me up and make me feel safe.”
Andy feels that “Intimacy has a protective quality – you give and receive protection on a physical and psychological level.”
Intimacy with Yourself
When we speak of intimacy, we’re usually referring to a between-person dynamic.
But what about the relationship we have with ourselves? Can you foster intimacy with yourself? Ricky thought so, and he gave an example.
“I used to skinny dip in the summer. No one would know I was there even if they walked past 10 meters away. Sitting among trees in the ice-cold fresh spring water butt naked. I wouldn’t really do that if other people were around, I’d stay in my boxers.”
He feels comfortable in his own company. He didn’t put it into these words, but our conversation made it clear. He feels connected to himself.
If you don’t have a close relationship with yourself, you can’t really be intimate with other people either.
Maybe some men (or people rather) are not emotionally open with themselves and, therefore haven’t developed the thought processes and language necessary for intimacy.
As the saying goes “People can only meet you as deeply as they’ve met themselves” (Matt Kahn).
What Gets in the Way of Intimacy for Men
This is a big question as it’s not just about the individual but the way we view and treat men as a society.
As I touched on in the introduction, societal expectations and our socialization have a lot to do with why some men may struggle with intimacy.
But it’s not only that. Every man has had a unique upbringing and has a different attachment style and personality. These also play a role in his need and desire for intimacy.
Attachment theory offers one explanation. Hazan and Shaver[3] proposed that romantic love works as an attachment process, shaped by the same secure, anxious, and avoidant styles seen between infants and caregivers.
An adult with an avoidant style may struggle with several parts of intimacy at once. To them, closeness itself feels threatening.
Attachment style is also linked to openness about sex. In a meta-analysis of 30 studies, attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety were both associated with lower sexual self-disclosure to a romantic partner[4]. These are correlations, not proof of cause.
Brendan said, “Intimacy is a big black hole for most men.
When most of them are asked how they feel or to discuss an emotional topic, it makes them feel uncomfortable and vulnerable.” He links this partly to his upbringing.
He added, “Society and upbringing are fundamental reasons why men struggle with intimacy. I grew up with three sisters and I think that made it easier for me to be intimate. I’m very comfortable opening up and being vulnerable – it’s a personal choice.”
In Keenan’s opinion, “Many men think that speaking about and showing emotions is for women. They think they should be strong and show no mercy or feelings. But although many men struggle to open up, they also seek emotional support, connection, and understanding. I don’t think men can feel intimate or close to someone unless those things are there.”
Eric said, “As a man, it feels really easy for my brain to fall into a panic about what’s expected of me – a weight of responsibility.
I feel like there’s pressure to achieve something, to be a provider and dominate life, rather than to just live it.
When someone can make me feel like I don’t need to achieve anything to be loved, that’s a very high level of intimacy for me.”
What About on a Personal Level?
Marlin thinks men might close off when they feel they can’t meet their partner’s expectations.
These expectations may partly be due to what society expects a man to provide and how it expects him to behave. Men likely put these expectations on themselves as well.
Ricky said, for him, “Misunderstanding and lack of communication can get in the way of intimacy.”
Rasheed also mentioned communication, and named three situations that make a man pull away:
- “when a woman doesn’t take time to understand what you’re trying to communicate in a disagreement”
- “when she deals with disagreements illogically or irrationally”
- “when you feel you and your boundaries have been disrespected.”
He added, “All of that can cause a man to disconnect emotionally. The emotional disconnection can also lead to sexual disconnection, which can lead to cheating.”
For Eric, it’s about relationship anxiety, “Sometimes I get this existential worry that I’m not good enough. It makes me feel desperate and causes me to shut down emotionally and not experience intimacy authentically – in those moments, all I want is to take and be validated. Intimacy shouldn’t be about taking, which I think is a big problem for men – they expect their other half to provide and give emotionally, while they just take. It’s about appreciating the experience and beauty of connection and closeness.”
Andy’s thoughts were, “We can end up in a cycle of watching TV shows and sitting down and eating, which is perfect for the cultivation of a decadent relationship.
But you need to push each other and make sure your relationship stays exciting or at least interesting.”
He added, “There’s nothing more irritating than someone who thinks they know you better than you know yourself. When they think they know your past, especially when it comes to previous relationships. That kinda thing makes me shut down.”
What Research Says About Masculine Norms
Larger studies point the same way, though most are correlational. A meta-analysis pooled 78 samples (19,453 participants) on conformity to traditional masculine norms[5]. Conformity was modestly but consistently linked to worse mental health, and more strongly to reluctance to seek psychological help.
Not every norm mattered equally. Self-reliance, power over women, and playboy behavior were the norms most clearly linked to poorer outcomes. Putting work first showed no significant link.
Studies of men in relationships find a similar cost. Normative male alexithymia is a learned difficulty putting feelings into words. Among 175 men, higher scores on it went with lower relationship satisfaction, poorer communication, and greater fear of intimacy[6].
A later study of 158 adults in couples found that alexithymia and fear of intimacy together statistically explained the lower satisfaction of more alexithymic partners[7].
These designs cannot show that emotional restriction causes unhappiness. An unhappy relationship could make a man more guarded. Still, the same pattern recurs across samples and outcomes.
Emancipation From Toxic Masculinity
“Men who believe emotions are “for women” struggle to connect with their own emotions”, according to Jason. And it’s true; if you’re emotionally closed off, you can’t experience true intimacy.
He believes that some men’s rejection of intimacy comes from a place of fear, “it’s fear of losing control, of no longer being the alpha in the relationship. Some men want to be in control of the relationship dynamic. They think that if they’re too vulnerable or give a woman too much, they’ll be seen as weak.”
Women aren’t innocent in all of this because they’ve also been socialized to believe the “boys don’t cry” narrative.
Let’s be real: many women are put off by men who cry or show too much emotion, and men know that.
Jason continued, “Men fear losing their partner. They know how men work and that some of them are predators. Women also get approached more often than men. It can make men feel really insecure.”
Naturally, these attitudes and behaviors aren’t helpful for intimacy. In Jason’s opinion, “Men who are emancipated from toxic masculinity and feel secure in themselves are much more comfortable with intimacy.”
Rasheed agreed: “Feeling emasculated gets in the way of intimacy.”
Ricky shared that when he and his friend used to have emotional conversations, they would call it “our non-gay intimate moment”.
This is an example of men being scared that emotional openness and vulnerability make them effeminate. Curiously, homosexuality has been associated with being like a woman. For some men, it’s the worst insult they could receive.
Nevertheless, despite their derogatory description of it, they were still seeking closeness, understanding, and openness. So, even if it makes some of them feel uncomfortable and less manly, they do desire emotional intimacy.
Masculinity as a Constant Test
Why is vulnerability so hard? Esther Perel offers a therapist’s view.
She argues that masculinity is less a settled identity than an imperative that men must keep proving. The cultural command to “man up” captures it.
Popular debate often centers on men’s power. Perel says her clinical work spends more time with men’s sense of powerlessness and their fear of losing what little power they feel they have.
In her view, male vulnerability is part of the structure of masculine identity, not a personality quirk.
The constant pressure to re-prove that identity is, she suggests, an under-recognized driver of men’s mental-health struggles.
Jason described a similar fear of losing control.
Evidence Check: Is Intimacy More Than Sex?
Verdict: ✅ Supported, with limits. Research points towards yes on the first question and partly on the second, but it is not firm proof.
Does sharing personal things build closeness?
✅ Yes, at least straight afterwards. The main evidence is one lab experiment with strangers, repeated once with children, and neither checked whether the closeness lasted. Research suggests that:
- Strangers who took turns answering more and more personal questions felt closer than strangers who made small talk. The session lasted 45 minutes, so it shows how closeness can start, not whether it lasts[8].
- Children aged 9 to 13 felt closer after sharing personal things and playing a game together online. Because they did both, we cannot tell whether the sharing or the game made the difference[9].
Is the boost from sex really about affection and a happy relationship?
⚠️ Partly, it seems. These studies only asked people about their sex lives and moods, so they cannot show what causes what. Research suggests that:
- Part of the reason sex lifts people’s mood seems to be the affection that comes with it. This came from 106 couples tracked through daily life, all working parents, so it may not hold for everyone[10].
- Part of the reason sex goes with feeling good about life seems to be a happy relationship. In three large surveys, sex more than about once a week brought no extra boost, so it is not just about the sex[11].
- Sex was followed by a better mood the next day, especially when it felt close and pleasurable. But this study of 152 adults over 21 days did not test affection or the relationship itself[12].
How to Be More Intimate
From the men’s responses, we can draw several conclusions on how you can improve the level of intimacy in your relationship.
- Physical Touch: Sex and physical touch are important. Communicate about your sex life and be creative.
- Ease: Be comfortable around each other, let your guard down, and allow a man to be himself.
- Support: Ask the man in your life how he would like to be supported. Maybe he just wants a hug, or to speak his mind without interruption or interpretation.
- Love Language: Find out what his love language is.
- Shared Interests: Take an interest in his interests.
- Listening: Practice active listening.
- Kindness: Little acts of kindness go a long way.
- Quality Time: Do fun things together, make new memories, go on an adventure, invite him out on a date. Create shared experiences.
- Encouragement: Encourage and support the men in your life. Tell them when they’ve done something well, express your gratitude, and provide words of affirmation.
- Self-Worth: Don’t make a man feel like his worth is dependent on his earnings and “alpha status”.
- Protection: Protect him and have his back.
- Tears: If you laugh or gag when a man cries, it’s time for some introspection.
- Shared Responsibility: We all have a responsibility to provide the space for men to share their inner worlds and experience intimacy.
- Honesty: Communicate openly and honestly about how you feel, and don’t resort to passive-aggressiveness and mind games.
- Parenting: If you’re a parent of boys, encourage them to be open and express their emotions.
- Boundaries: Respect his boundaries. You can’t force someone to be more emotionally open, so build trust and allow him to open up in his own time, without judgment.
Final Thoughts
The world is changing, and society is finally becoming more accepting of the fact that men are humans with emotional needs too. But, of course, everyone is different.
Men differ in how they relate to intimacy:
- Not Interested: Some men aren’t very interested in intimacy.
- Unsure How: Some want it but don’t know how to achieve it.
- Comfortable: Others are very comfortable with intimacy.
If your partner is not giving you the level or type of intimacy that’s important to you, have a conversation with him. Then find ways to satisfy each of your needs.
Most men want more than “just sex”. They seek emotional closeness and companionship. Intimacy means different things to different people, and men are just as well-rounded in their appreciation for closeness as women.
However, if your man rejects intimacy beyond the physical entirely, consider whether that’s enough for you or whether you might need to consider your options.
It could have something to do with his upbringing or attachment style, but it’s not your job to fix him. He has to want that himself.
References
- R. F. Baumeister and E. Bratslavsky, “Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 49–67, 1999, doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_3.
- H. T. Reis and P. Shaver, “Intimacy as an interpersonal process,” in Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions, S. W. Duck, Ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1988, pp. 367–389.
- C. Hazan and P. Shaver, “Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 511–524, 1987, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511.
- K. O. Knowles and M. D. Hammond, “Meta-analyzing people’s self-disclosure of sexual information to romantic partners,” The Journal of Sex Research, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 474–486, 2026, doi: 10.1080/00224499.2025.2455543.
- Y. J. Wong, M. R. Ho, S. Y. Wang, and I. S. Miller, “Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 80–93, 2017, doi: 10.1037/cou0000176.
- E. N. Karakis and R. F. Levant, “Is normative male alexithymia associated with relationship satisfaction, fear of intimacy and communication quality among men in relationships?” The Journal of Men’s Studies, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 179–186, 2012, doi: 10.3149/jms.2003.179.
- M. Lyvers, L. Pickett, K. Needham, and F. A. Thorberg, “Alexithymia, fear of intimacy, and relationship satisfaction,” Journal of Family Issues, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1068–1089, 2022, doi: 10.1177/0192513×211010206.
- A. Aron, E. Melinat, E. N. Aron, R. D. Vallone, and R. J. Bator, “The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 363–377, 1997, doi: 10.1177/0146167297234003.
- K. L. Swerbenski, K. C. Barnett, P. G. Devine, and K. Shutts, “Making “fast friends” online in middle childhood and early adolescence,” Social Development, vol. 33, no. 1, Art. no. e12708, 2023, doi: 10.1111/sode.12708.
- A. Debrot, N. Meuwly, A. Muise, E. A. Impett, and D. Schoebi, “More than just sex: Affection mediates the association between sexual activity and well-being,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 287–299, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0146167216684124.
- A. Muise, U. Schimmack, and E. A. Impett, “Sexual frequency predicts greater well-being, but more is not always better,” Social Psychological and Personality Science, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 295–302, 2016, doi: 10.1177/1948550615616462.
- T. B. Kashdan, F. R. Goodman, M. Stiksma, C. R. Milius, and P. E. McKnight, “Sexuality leads to boosts in mood and meaning in life with no evidence for the reverse direction: A daily diary investigation,” Emotion, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 563–576, 2018, doi: 10.1037/emo0000324.