Relationship OCD (ROCD)

Relationship OCD (ROCD) is a subtype of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in which people experience unwanted and persistent thoughts about their current or past relationships, known as obsessions. 

Many of us experience varying levels of relationship anxiety from time to time. However, for those with ROCD, these obsessions are all-consuming and uncontrollable and often get in the way of establishing and maintaining romantic relationships. 

Obsessions are intrusive and distressing, and people usually try various strategies to quell them.

Some uncertainty about a partner or relationship is common. With ROCD, that uncertainty can fuel disproportionate levels of stress and anxiety. That distress drives compulsions.

Compulsions are repetitive behaviors, rituals, or thoughts that are used to neutralize negative feelings and ease anxieties.

People with ROCD find these unwanted thoughts and feelings impossible to let go of, and eventually, these unrelenting obsessions and compulsions can sabotage a relationship.

People with ROCD tend to experience the most distress over their current romantic relationships. However, some might even ruminate over their past relationships or relationships that are yet to occur. 

Even once a relationship ends, the thoughts can continue. A person might become obsessed with the idea that their previous partner was the “right” one. They may also fear that they will never find someone like their ex.

Types of ROCD

There are 2 “types” of ROCD: 

Relationship-centered ROCD

This type of ROCD involves fears and doubts about the relationship itself.

For example, someone who suffers from relationship-centered ROCD might perpetually fear that they are not in the “right” relationship or experiencing “true love” with their current partner.

They might worry that their partner is not truly in love with them or that their partner is not “the one.”

The focus is the temperature, or tenor, of the relationship. Typical worries include “We’re not in love enough,” “We’re not happy enough,” and “What if you don’t love me enough?” Another is “What if our relationship isn’t strong enough and you leave me?”

People with relationship-centered ROCD might also experience thoughts such as, “What if there is someone better for me out there?” or “What if I am in the wrong relationship?” 

Partner-focused ROCD

Partner-focused ROCD is more specific and person-centered. Individuals who struggle with this type of ROCD tend to over-evaluate their partner’s attributes rather than the relationship as a whole.

For example, they might question their partner’s intelligence, manners, intentions, loyalty, attractiveness, morals, values, or ethics.

Typical partner-focused obsessions fix on a perceived flaw. Examples include “Your nose is too big,” “You’re not funny enough,” or “What if you’re not smart enough?”

They might question “What if my partner is a terrible person?” or “What if my partner is not intelligent enough for my liking?”

It is also possible to have both relationship-centered ROCD and partner-centered ROCD at the same time. People with both types of ROCD stress about their relationships and their partner’s traits simultaneously.

ROCD Symptoms: Examples of Obsessions

Obsessions are the distressing, intrusive thoughts at the center of ROCD. Many people know, even as they experience them, that the distress feels out of proportion.

• Is this “true love?”
• Is my partner the “One?”
• What if there is someone better for me out there?
• Is my partner good enough for me? 
• What if my partner and I are not a good match?
• What if I am attracted to other people? Does it mean I am not in love with my partner?
• I didn’t feel turned on when they kissed me just now. Does that mean something is wrong with our relationship?
• How can I tell if I am truly in love with my partner?
• Are we a happy couple? Are other people happier than we are?
• Why do I keep obsessing over my partner’s “flaws?”
• What if I am making a mistake by being with my partner?
• What if I am never able to completely trust my partner because of previous relationships or a past betrayal?
• What if I am just leading my partner on?
• What if I regret my choice to be in a relationship in the future?
• What if I am not good enough for my partner? What if he is not good enough for me?
• What if other people can see that my partner is not good enough for me, and are judging me or pitying me because of it?
• What if I am in the wrong relationship?

Examples of ROCD Compulsions

Compulsions are the repeated behaviors, rituals, and mental acts that follow an obsession. They bring short-term relief but keep the cycle going.

Sheva Rajaee, MFT, author of Relationship OCD, describes the typical compulsions (Rajaee, 2022). People with ROCD may check the “temperature” of their relationship every day.

They might ask themselves or their partner, “Are we right for one another? How do I feel about you? How do you feel about me?”

• Seeking reassurance by asking friends and family what they think about your partner and whether they think their relationship is working. 
• Coming up with lists of reasons why you and your partner are meant to be together.
• Subjecting yourself and/or your partner to various relationship tests or online quizzes to feel more assured about your relationship.
• Continuously replaying all of the good and bad times you have had with your partner.
• Constantly obsessing over your partner’s “flaws” (i.e., face, hair, body, and/or other physical characteristics) or “bad habits”.
• Obsessing over your partner’s personality and other emotional, social, or intellectual attributes.
• Comparing your partner’s appearance and other qualities to those of another person, and even feeling relieved when your partner has more positive or fewer negative qualities than the other person.
• Comparing your romantic relationship to romantic relationships that you see on social media or in romantic movies.
• Avoiding watching romantic movies or TV shows altogether because they bring up unwanted thoughts and anxieties about your relationship.
• Searching the internet for love stories and then comparing your romantic relationship to other people’s romantic relationships.
• Comparing your previous relationships to your current one.
• Avoiding committing to relationships or making long-term plans with a partner out of fear that it will not last or that something is missing in the relationship.
• Initiating sex with your partner with the intention of determining whether you are still sexually attracted to them.
• Or, avoiding being intimate with your partner for fear of not being able to sexually satisfy them, or for fear they will not sexually satisfy you.

Research on ROCD: Severity and Symptom Types

Research has tested whether ROCD is a distinct, disabling condition. It has also tested whether the two types hold up in data.

Clinical Versus Community ROCD

Mild doubt about a partner is normal. Doron and colleagues (2016) asked whether ROCD in people seeking treatment differs from ROCD in the community, and from OCD more generally. The study compared three kinds of group.

• 22 people with a clinical ROCD presentation.
• 28 community members with significant ROCD symptoms who were not in treatment.
• Comparison groups without ROCD.

A structured clinical interview established diagnoses. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, the standard clinician-rated measure, assessed OCD severity.

The clinical group showed more interference with daily life and higher OCD severity than the comparison groups. Yet the clinical and community ROCD groups scored similarly on core OCD severity.

What set the clinical group apart was disruption, not intrusiveness. The symptoms disrupted daily life far more.

Both ROCD groups also endorsed more maladaptive relationship beliefs. The clinical group reported markedly higher depression.

The authors concluded that ROCD is disabling in its own right, not ordinary doubt in clinical language. The samples were small, and community participants were self-selected volunteers. The findings need replication.

Two Types, Three Factors

Doron and colleagues first tested the two types in community samples, before the 2014 framework. Both symptom clusters showed up as coherent, measurable patterns in people who had never sought treatment (Doron et al., 2012a, 2012b).

ROCD therefore looks like a continuum. It runs from everyday doubt to clinically significant obsessing.

A 2025 study refined the picture using the German-language Relationship Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (ROCI), a self-report measure. In two non-clinical samples, three factors fit better than two (Brauer & Borchardt, 2025).

• Own love: doubt about one’s own love for the partner.
• Relationship “rightness”: doubt about whether the relationship is right.
• Partner’s love: doubt about whether the partner truly loves you back.

The three-factor model held for men and women. A single combined ROCD score fit worse than the three strands taken separately.

A network analysis of 493 participants approached the question differently (Esfahan et al., 2024). It showed which symptoms hold each cluster together.

For relationship-centered doubt, the key symptoms were doubt that one’s affection is “genuine” and a sense that something is “off.” For partner-focused doubt, it was doubt that the partner is “intelligent enough.” Neuroticism was the strongest personality link.

ROCD in LGB and Heterosexual Adults

Most of this validation work ignored sexual orientation. A 2024 study compared 102 lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults with 98 heterosexual adults (Angelo et al., 2024). All were in relationships of at least six months. All completed measures of ROCD symptoms, personality traits, and perfectionism.

LGB participants reported more doubt about whether their partner truly loved them.

They also scored higher on Negative Affect and Antagonism, two personality trait domains, and on perfectionism about mistakes and parental expectations.

Partner-focused symptoms did not differ. So the pattern is specific, not a blanket claim that ROCD is more severe in LGB relationships. The study was cross-sectional, a single snapshot in time, so it cannot say whether minority stress or a difference in ROCD itself explains it.

Causes of ROCD

The root of ROCD could be shaped by an incessant need to feel like your partner and/or romantic relationship is “perfect” or “right.”

Several overlapping factors can feed that need, and the sections below take them in turn:

• Myth of the One: The belief that one partner should meet every emotional, intellectual, sexual, and spiritual need.
• Spark Ideal: Treating instant, intense attraction as proof of a right match.
• Intimacy Anxiety: Closeness means giving up control, which can feel threatening to anxiety-prone people.
• Attachment and Upbringing: Early relationships shape how safe and trustworthy a partner feels.
• Existential Concerns: Fears of isolation and of not knowing who you are.
• Certainty Beliefs: Needing to be sure, and treating a doubt as meaningful, keeps the doubt going.

The Myth of “the One”

Popular culture reinforces the “myth of the one.” It suggests that a partner should fulfill every emotional, intellectual, sexual, and spiritual need.

This leads to unrealistic expectations of relationships, and dissatisfaction when these standards aren’t met and can exacerbate relationship anxiety or relationship OCD.

Sheva Rajaee, MFT, challenges some common misconceptions in romantic relationships. The idea of “the one” suggests that there is a single person who is a perfect match for us in every way.

This notion puts unnecessary pressure on both partners.

No one person can fulfill all our desires and needs.

Similarly, the concept of the “spark” refers to an immediate and intense attraction or connection when meeting someone for the first time.

While this can be an exciting experience, it may lead people to overlook important aspects of compatibility and long-term relationship potential.

Whose Ideal Is “the One”?

The “myth of the one” is not culturally neutral. It reflects a model common in Western, individualist societies. There, one partner is expected to be lover, best friend, co-parent, and intellectual equal at once.

Other settings differ. Those roles are often spread across extended family, friends, and the wider community. People in more collectivist contexts tend to define themselves through family and group obligations.

Individualist cultures instead idealize an autonomous, self-defining romantic partnership (Oyserman et al., 2002).

None of this makes ROCD itself culture-specific. But some expectations that ROCD attaches its doubt to come from a cultural script about romance. One example is the idea that a “real” partner should never leave room for uncertainty.

Intimacy and Anxiety

The desire for intimacy is natural. For people prone to anxiety, though, it can also be a trigger. Intimacy means letting go of control. That can induce fear and discomfort.

Constantly seeking fulfillment from a partner can lead to increased anxiety, especially in those prone to it. If expectations are not met, our brain interprets it as something being wrong, magnifying the experience in people who are prone to anxiety.

Upbringing, Attachment, and Onset

Sheva Rajaee also emphasizes the importance of considering one’s upbringing and attachment styles in the treatment of ROCD. These factors play a crucial role in shaping our relationships.

Attachment theory explains why upbringing matters. John Bowlby proposed that early experiences with caregivers build an internal working model. This is a mental template of how available and trustworthy close others will be (Bowlby, 1973).

That template shapes a person’s forecasts about a romantic partner. The two ends look quite different.

• Secure model: “reliable, and will stay.” Ordinary uncertainty feels manageable.
• Insecure model: “unreliable, and my worth to them is uncertain.” Ambiguity can read as danger.

Hazan and Shaver (1987) extended attachment theory to adult love. They found that the three infant attachment styles Ainsworth described map onto similar patterns in adult romantic relationships. These include worry about a partner’s commitment and responses to uncertainty.

Doron and colleagues’ “double relationship-vulnerability hypothesis” builds the bridge to ROCD (Doron et al., 2013).

ROCD is most likely to emerge where OCD-related beliefs and insecure working models of self and partner are both present.

Rigid beliefs alone do not cause ROCD. A person can hold them without developing it, if their sense of their own and their partner’s trustworthiness is secure.

ROCD typically manifests in early adulthood. It can also arise in the teenage years or later in life. Without treatment, the symptoms tend to follow you into all of your romantic relationships.

Existential Concerns

Research links existential concerns to ROCD symptoms. In an online survey of 353 undergraduates, all five classic concerns were positively associated with symptoms (Menzies, 2024).

• Isolation (among the strongest links)
• Identity (among the strongest links)
• Meaninglessness
• Guilt
• Death anxiety

The associations held after controlling for relationship quality, catastrophic relationship beliefs, and neuroticism. That suggests existential anxiety adds something these familiar risk factors do not explain.

For example, a person may fear being fundamentally alone. Or they may fear not knowing who they truly are. Either fear can attach itself to the one relationship that seems to offer a way out.

Why Doubt Becomes Unbearable

Everyone has unwanted, intrusive thoughts from time to time. In OCD, the problem is the catastrophic meaning attached to the thought, not the thought itself.

People with ROCD, in treatment or not, endorsed more of three dysfunctional beliefs than people without the condition (Doron et al., 2016).

• Inflated responsibility: feeling responsible for getting the “right” answer about the relationship.
• Intolerance of uncertainty: being unable to tolerate not knowing for certain.
• Doubt as evidence: treating the mere presence of a doubting thought as meaningful.

A passing thought like “What if I don’t really love him?” is ordinary. It becomes ROCD when the person believes that having the thought means something is wrong. Checking, list-making, and reassurance-seeking are attempts to manufacture certainty.

Nobody can be certain of another person’s future feelings. So those attempts can never fully succeed.

Intolerance of uncertainty is not the whole story. A study of 673 community adults, not specific to ROCD, added a second ingredient (Xu et al., 2024). OCD symptoms were most severe in people high on both intolerance of uncertainty and emotion-related impulsivity.

Emotion-related impulsivity is the urge to act rashly to relieve distress. The link was strongest for checking and obsessing. How strongly someone feels driven to act on not-knowing may matter as much as how bad it feels.

Childhood Roots and Self-Worth

Where do these beliefs come from? Research points to childhood experience and to self-worth.

• Parentification: In 788 adults, it predicted both OCD and ROCD symptoms, and obsessive beliefs statistically explained the link (Trak et al., 2025).
• Vulnerable narcissism: In 319 adults with clinician-diagnosed ROCD, it predicted partner-focused severity, partly through self-worth tied to the partner’s perceived value (Melli et al., 2024).

Parentification means being given an adult caregiving role toward a parent or sibling. Adults who saw some benefit in the role showed the opposite pattern.

Vulnerable narcissism is a fragile grandiosity. It brings sensitivity to criticism and a need for outside validation.

For some people, over-evaluating a partner’s flaws may help manage a self-worth that depends on having an impressive partner.

How OCD Can Affect Your Relationship

Relationship OCD can make maintaining relationships more complex as it poses challenges on both sides.

People with ROCD feel a heightened sense of fear and lack of emotional security in their relationships. As a result, they constantly seek reassurance from their partner.

A partner might find themselves incessantly saying things such as, “Yes, I love you” or “Yes, I am happy to be with you.”

The need to feel constantly validated is exhausting. So is the need to keep providing it. This is true for both people in the couple.

It can also lead to feelings of annoyance and confusion when the partner doesn’t understand the source of the anxiety.

Most people have doubts in their relationships occasionally. For people with ROCD, though, insecurity and doubt often become the primary focus of the relationship.

People with ROCD speculate obsessively about their relationship, and their thoughts center on their loved ones.

“I went out with him for more than five years. I really loved him, but I started to obsess that perhaps I didn’t love him. I felt compelled to confess this to him. It was the OCD telling me that I didn’t love him; I know it was. I thought that if I wasn’t in love with him, then I was wasting his life and hurting him, and he should go find somebody else that loves him, really loves him. So again I was afraid of hurting him. The doubt about my love for him was not rational at all. The doubt just came out of nowhere. “

Lived Experience of Relationship OCD (Linda)

What Partners Experience

Partners of people with OCD must take on a lot of emotional responsibility. Depending on the severity of one’s OCD, this anxiety and mistrust can result in resentment on the other side.

Partners also live with daily questioning of the relationship. They may watch their significant other “check out” strangers, take online relationship tests, or voice doubts to other people.

Relationship OCD may also make sex harder to enjoy. Obsessive thoughts can be distracting and all-consuming during intimacy.

Research on the partner’s side is still limited. A qualitative study looked at couples affected by OCD, not ROCD specifically (Walseth et al., 2017). Researchers ran focus groups with patients in treatment and analyzed what they said in their own words.

OCD introduced mental and physical distance into the relationship. Partners described feeling under surveillance, monitored to make sure they followed the person’s rituals.

Some also felt “pathologized” by their own efforts to accommodate. The power imbalance persisted even when symptoms were mild. The authors concluded that couple therapy should address it.

A 2024 survey looked at partner accommodation. This means adjusting routines, joining rituals, or giving repeated reassurance to ease the person’s distress. It included 50 people with OCD and 20 of their romantic partners (Toohey et al., 2024).

• Accommodation rose with symptom severity and functional impairment.
• It was also linked to both partners’ negative emotional states.
• Higher extraversion in the partner predicted less accommodation.

The authors argued that romantic partners should be routinely included in OCD treatment. The sample was small and self-selected, so the predictors are preliminary.

If left untreated, ROCD can create a great deal of stress for both parties and pose a serious challenge to your love life.

ROCD, Infidelity, and Marital Instability

A 2026 study asked whether the two ROCD types predict relationship breakdown, and by what route (Genç & Büyükada, 2026). It surveyed 227 married adults (155 women, 72 men).

Measures covered both symptom types, infidelity tendency, and marital instability. The authors used structural equation modeling, which tests proposed pathways between variables.

• Partner-focused doubt predicted a greater tendency toward infidelity, which in turn predicted marital instability.
• Relationship-centered doubt predicted marital instability directly, not through infidelity tendency.

So the two types appear to reach relationship breakdown by different routes. The design was cross-sectional, a single snapshot, and relied on self-report. It cannot show that partner-focused obsessing causes infidelity. Both could come from a shared underlying insecurity.

How Do I Stop OCD From Ruining My Relationship?

Professional treatment is the optimal way to stop OCD from affecting your relationship. Beyond that, several strategies can help you manage the relationship so it stays healthy and satisfying.

• Recognize Doubts as Symptoms: Your thoughts and doubts are just symptoms, not facts. Questioning your relationship does not make it wrong. It means your OCD voice will not let you feel settled.
• Communicate Openly: Open communication is the foundation of any romantic relationship. Help your partner understand your symptoms, because understanding builds trust and poor communication jeopardizes the relationship.
• Practice Mindfulness: Obsessive thoughts run rampant when your mind fights them. Mindfulness techniques teach you to notice and accept thoughts to regain control.
• Recalibrate Daily: Practice resetting your thoughts throughout the day, so you can catch obsessive patterns before they run rampant.
• Other Supports: Journaling, self-talk, and joining a support group can all reduce the impact of ROCD on your relationship.

ROCD Compared With Ordinary Doubt and Related Conditions

ROCD overlaps with several other experiences, so it helps to know where the boundaries fall. The table compares the patterns.

Pattern	What drives the doubt	What keeps it going
Ordinary relationship doubt	A passing question about the relationship.	It is tolerated, weighed, and eventually left alone without a confident answer.
ROCD	Intrusive doubt anchored to the relationship or partner.	The checking, comparing, and reassurance-seeking cycle, whose short-term relief makes the doubt return.
Generalized anxiety (GAD)	Free-floating worry that drifts across finances, health, work, and family.	No single behavior is expected to resolve it, so relationship worry fades when another concern takes over.
Attachment anxiety	An insecure working model that expects a partner to be unreliable.	A general expectation of unavailability, which can exist without the compulsive certainty-seeking cycle.
Gaslighting-related self-doubt	A relationship in which a person’s perception and memory were persistently contradicted.	Contested reality in a current or past relationship, not certainty-seeking beliefs.

ROCD and Attachment Anxiety

Attachment insecurity is ROCD’s most serious rival explanation. Attachment theory offers a general account of why some people expect a partner to be untrustworthy or unavailable. The double relationship-vulnerability model treats that insecurity as one of two ingredients, not a full substitute.

The most direct test of the overlap asked whether a validated ROCD measure adds anything once attachment style is accounted for. It used the ROCI in two non-clinical samples. The measure predicted relationship satisfaction beyond attachment-style measures, but only modestly (Brauer & Borchardt, 2025).

There are two defensible readings.

• Skeptical reading: ROCD, as currently measured, may be largely a specific expression of attachment anxiety.
• Generous reading: A modest independent contribution is exactly what a joint-vulnerability model predicts.

Both are live positions in the field.

Self-Doubt From Gaslighting

Not all relationship-focused doubt traces back to ROCD’s belief system. Gaslighting is a pattern of psychological manipulation. One person leads another to doubt their own thinking, perception, and sense of reality (Klein et al., 2026).

Chronic exposure can produce persistent self-doubt, second-guessing, and reassurance-seeking that resembles OCD. It need not meet OCD’s diagnostic threshold.

As clinical psychologist Dr. Ramani Durvasula explains, a narcissistic relationship or upbringing can persistently contradict a person’s perception and memory. That can leave people “plagued by self-doubt in dozens and dozens of small ways.”

They keep double-checking themselves. They ask others for confirmation because they no longer trust their own memory (Durvasula, n.d.).

Durvasula advises anyone unsure which pattern is present to “get a mental health consultation.” The aim is to see whether they meet “the true diagnostic criteria for OCD.”

She also describes a milder version in herself. She still “often” asks for reassurance. She will “immediately assume” she is wrong when questioned, “even when I know something really, really well.”

This is one clinician’s professional viewpoint, not an established empirical finding. The distinction still matters for treatment.

ROCD is sustained by certainty-seeking beliefs and treated with ERP. Self-doubt rooted in gaslighting is addressed by recognizing that dynamic and, where possible, leaving or healing from it.

ROCD Treatment

Like most other OCD subtypes, ROCD is most effectively treated using Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) therapy. ERP is a type of cognitive-behavioral therapy considered the first line of psychotherapy for OCD (Hezel & Simpson, 2019). It has two parts.

• Exposure: People are deliberately and gradually exposed to their OCD triggers, so they become desensitized to them over time.
• Response prevention: People resist the compulsion that normally follows, such as checking or seeking reassurance.

The therapy purposely provokes more anxiety in the short term.

The aim is to disrupt the neural circuit between the processing and action parts of the brain. This “rewires” the brain so that intrusive thoughts and ritualistic behaviors lose their power.

Patients stay in the feared situation and lean into the discomfort and uncertainty. Nothing terrible happens. They learn that they do not need their compulsions to cope, and that their fearful thoughts are just thoughts.

An ERP therapist reviews which thoughts or scenarios cause you the most anxiety. They then work with you through gradual, controlled exposure.

People with ROCD might learn to sit with the anxiety of thinking they may be with the wrong partner. They are taught to take power back from the relationship anxiety and to reframe their thoughts.

For example, “I have no clue if this is the right relationship, and I’m choosing to go forward anyway because this person matters to me.”

ERP can feel very challenging and time-consuming. Over time, patients learn that they can cope with their thoughts without relying on ritualistic behaviors.

ERP is one of the most powerful tools for treating OCD. It teaches people to live with the anxiety and see that nothing terrible will necessarily happen.

Evidence for ROCD Treatment

The evidence has limits. ERP’s status as first-line therapy for ROCD rests mainly on the wider OCD evidence base (Hezel & Simpson, 2019). That base comes from decades of trials across presentations such as contamination and checking. ROCD lacks large ERP trials of its own.

Clinicians therefore adapt exposure exercises to relationship content, such as deliberately sitting with “What if this isn’t the right relationship?” That is reasonable practice. It is a different claim from “ERP has been trialed in ROCD samples and found effective.”

The ROCD-specific trial evidence comes from a different angle. It tests brief, app-delivered cognitive training aimed at the beliefs described in the causes section.

• Students: 97 students started the app at once or after a 15-day wait. Both groups showed medium-to-large drops in OCD-related beliefs and symptoms (Roncero et al., 2019).
• Subclinical ROCD: A follow-up applied the same approach to ROCD symptoms and cognitions in a subclinical sample (Cerea et al., 2020).
• Couples: In 103 couples, both partners used the app for 15 days. They showed more resilience to ROCD triggers than a no-intervention control (Gorelik et al., 2023).

The couples trial also found fewer OCD-related and catastrophizing beliefs and lower anxious attachment at 45 days. Caveats apply. Participants were non-clinical, recruited online, with low baseline symptoms. Over a fifth dropped out, and the control was a passive waitlist.

The student trial used students screened for OCD-related beliefs, not people diagnosed with ROCD. Taken together, this is early evidence for a scalable adjunct to therapist-delivered ERP, not a replacement for it.

Sources

• Angelo, N. L., Brullo, G., Marsiglia, A., Tirelli, A., Piroddi, E., Viti, C., Aicardi, I., & Pozza, A. (2024). Romantic relationship obsessive-compulsive doubts, perfectionism, and DSM-5 personality traits in LGB people: A comparison with heterosexual individuals. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1187179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1187179
• Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic Books.
• Brauer, K., & Borchardt, L. (2025). Validation of the German Relationship-Obsessive Compulsive Inventory: Testing the factorial structure, measurement invariance, and external validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 81(11), 1143–1154. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70024
• Cerea, S., Ghisi, M., Bottesi, G., Carraro, E., Broggio, D., & Doron, G. (2020). Reaching reliable change using short, daily, cognitive training exercises delivered on a mobile application: The case of Relationship Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (ROCD) symptoms and cognitions in a subclinical cohort. Journal of Affective Disorders, 276, 775–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.043
• Doron, G., Derby, D. S., & Szepsenwol, O. (2014). Relationship obsessive compulsive disorder (ROCD): A conceptual framework. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.12.005
• Doron, G., Derby, D. S., Szepsenwol, O., Nahaloni, E., & Moulding, R. (2016). Relationship obsessive-compulsive disorder: Interference, symptoms, and maladaptive beliefs. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00058
• Doron, G., Derby, D. S., Szepsenwol, O., & Talmor, D. (2012a). Flaws and all: Exploring partner-focused obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 1(4), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2012.05.004
• Doron, G., Derby, D. S., Szepsenwol, O., & Talmor, D. (2012b). Tainted love: Exploring relationship-centered obsessive compulsive symptoms in two non-clinical cohorts. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 1(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2011.11.002
• Doron, G., Szepsenwol, O., Karp, E., & Gal, N. (2013). Obsessing about intimate-relationships: Testing the double relationship-vulnerability hypothesis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44(4), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.05.003
• Durvasula, R. (n.d.). Psychological effects of being gaslighted [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwAfRGaqUGQ
• Esfahan, M. M., Ayasrah, M. N., Ghayoumi, F., Motaharinasab, A., Tayim, N., & Aghaei, Z. S. P. S. (2024). The network structure of relationship obsessive-compulsive disorder presentations: The interplay between ROCD symptoms with maladaptive and non-maladaptive personality traits. Psychiatric Quarterly, 95(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-024-10079-6
• Genç, E., & Büyükada, E. (2026). The impact of obsessive-compulsive relationship symptoms on marital instability: Mediating role of infidelity tendency. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 52(2), Article e70122. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70122
• Gorelik, M., Szepsenwol, O., & Doron, G. (2023). Promoting couples’ resilience to relationship obsessive compulsive disorder (ROCD) symptoms using a CBT-based mobile application: A randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 9(11), Article e21673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21673
• Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
• Hezel, D. M., & Simpson, H. B. (2019). Exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and new directions. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(Suppl 1), S85–S92. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_516_18
• Klein, W., Wood, S., Forget, A.-A., & Bartz, J. A. (2026). A historical review of gaslighting: Tracing changing conceptualizations within psychiatry and psychology. Clinical Psychology Review, 126, Article 102742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102742
• Melli, G., Caccico, L., Micheli, E., Bulli, F., & Doron, G. (2024). Pathological narcissism and relationship obsessive-compulsive disorder (ROCD) symptoms: Exploring the role of vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 80(1), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23601
• Menzies, R. E. (2024). Alone together: The role of existential concerns in symptoms of relationship obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical Psychologist, 28(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13284207.2024.2322936
• Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
• Rajaee, S. (2022). Relationship OCD: A CBT-Based Guide to Move Beyond Obsessive Doubt, Anxiety, and Fear of Commitment in Romantic Relationships. New Harbinger Publications.
• Roncero, M., Belloch, A., & Doron, G. (2019). Can brief, daily training using a mobile app help change maladaptive beliefs? Crossover randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(2), Article e11443. https://doi.org/10.2196/11443
• Stossel, C. (Host). (2023, July 30). Relationship OCD: Expert Insights with Sheva Rajaee, MFT [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8Wh5ezL4c0
• Toohey, B. G., Quinlan, E., Reece, J., Wootton, B. M., & Paparo, J. (2024). A preliminary study of factors associated with accommodation of obsessive-compulsive symptoms by romantic partners. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(2), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12499
• Trak, E., Acar, S., & Inozu, M. (2025). How parentification relates to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and relationship obsessive-compulsive disorder (ROCD): The mediating role of obsessive beliefs. Current Psychology, 44(5), 4025–4039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07452-4
• Walseth, L. T., Haaland, V. Ø., Launes, G., Himle, J. A., & Håland, Å. T. (2017). Obsessive-compulsive disorder’s impact on partner relationships: A qualitative study. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 28(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975353.2017.1291239
• Xu, J., Ironside, M. L., Broos, H. C., Johnson, S. L., & Timpano, K. R. (2024). Urged to feel certain again: The role of emotion-related impulsivity on the relationships between intolerance of uncertainty and OCD symptom severity. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(2), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12456