What Is A Player In Dating

Are you wondering if your love interest is genuine or a player?

A player isn’t just someone who wants something casual. It’s someone who hides that intention from a partner, letting them believe the relationship is headed somewhere serious it was never going to go.

They manipulate and deceive people into giving them sex, attention, or validation. Someone upfront about wanting a casual relationship from the start isn’t a player. That’s the real dividing line.

Recognizing the signs of a player early on can help you avoid unnecessary heartbreak and stay emotionally safe.

If you get a sense that they’re not serious and only want to play games, then you should listen to that feeling.

You might feel confused, constantly question their intentions, or just get the feeling they’re hiding something and aren’t being honest.

Sometimes “butterflies” are your body warning you of a threat. You might read them as excitement, but they could be underlying fear and anxiety. Be mindful of that feeling and ask yourself honestly where it’s coming from.

Certain red flags in dating could mean the person you’re interested in is a player.

The 11 signs below fall into six core characteristics of a player:

• Mixed Signals: Their words and actions don’t match, and their interest switches on and off.
• Sex First: Physical contact is the priority, and interest fades once sex has happened.
• Emotional Distance: They make little effort to know you and stay vague about their own life.
• No Labels: They won’t define the relationship, acknowledge it in public, or introduce you to friends and family.
• Unreliability: They cancel plans, make excuses, and push past your boundaries.
• Manipulation: They use charm, hot-and-cold behavior, and mind games to get what they want quickly.

1. His words and actions don’t align

If their communication and behavior are inconsistent and confusing, that’s a potential sign they’re a player.

People who are elusive and inconsistent may not be genuinely interested.

One moment they seem really interested, and the next they seem cold and distant or go totally quiet.

You constantly feel confused and don’t know where you stand.

Warning Signs

• Says he wants to see you but never makes concrete plans
• Reads your messages but does not respond for days or weeks
• Only texts you when he wants something
• Says one thing (e.g., “I want to see you”) but acts another way (e.g., doesn’t make plans with you)
• Engages in “breadcrumbing”: giving you just enough attention to keep you interested without making any substantial effort to move the relationship forward

How a committed person would behave

A person who is genuinely interested in you would be mostly consistent in their communication and behavior.

For example, they would respond to your messages in a timely manner, make plans with you, and communicate and explain when they can’t meet up.

Their words and actions line up so if they say they like you and want to make plans, they follow through. You’re not constantly confused about how they feel about you.

2. His Priority Is A Sexual Relationship

If you sense they’re only interested in sex, that’s probably the case. For a player, dating is a game, and having sex with you is how they win.

They’re only a player if they pretend they want a relationship. Their actions don’t line up with their words.

If they tell you from the beginning they’re only looking for a casual/one-night thing then that doesn’t make them a player.

A qualitative study of breadcrumbing, a closely related pattern, captures the shift. One participant recalled: “every time he came to meet me, we either made out or got physical, but then slowly he distanced himself” (Khattar et al., 2023).

Warning Signs

• Want to get physical immediately
• Put a lot of emphasis on physical appearance and don’t seem interested in getting to know you
• Only want to meet at their house (“Netflix and chill” type of thing)
• Most (or all) conversations revolve around sex
• Text or call you in the middle of the night asking what you’re up to
• Are less affectionate or go totally cold after sex
• Never let you stay over
• Ghost you after sex

How a committed person would behave

Though they might show sexual interest (like flirting), they don’t put pressure on you to have sex.

Not every conversation has a sexual element, and they enjoy speaking to you about all sorts of topics.

They take an interest in you as a person and want to spend time with you outside of their bedroom.

If you have had sex, they don’t disappear. They want to keep seeing you.

3. Emotional Unavailability and No Sense of Commitment

If you feel like they’re not really interested in you as a person, they might be a player. You may also feel they do the bare minimum to keep things going.

A player is only interested in you for personal gain (like having sex or getting attention). So they make little effort to get to know you.

They don’t really listen and rarely remember things you tell them. When they talk, it’s usually about themselves and they refuse to open up to you emotionally.

Their behavior clearly shows they want to maintain an emotional distance and avoid getting close to you.

Warning Signs

• Doesn’t make an effort to get to know you
• Doesn’t remember things you tell him
• Talks mostly about himself
• Maintains emotional distance

How a committed person would behave

A person who is genuinely interested in you would try to get to know you and want you to get to know them as well.

They listen when you speak, ask questions, and show an interest in your life, thoughts, and feelings.

4. Avoids Defining Relationship

If they’re telling you “We don’t need a title, it’s just us” or “Why do we have to define our relationship?”, they might be a player.

Players want to keep you for their personal gain but don’t want to commit because they’re seeing other people and/ or fear commitment.

Warning Signs

• Says things like “let’s just see where it goes”
• Refuses to put a label on your relationship

How a committed person would behave

When a person is truly interested in building something with you, they’ll be open to discussing your relationship status.

They might not want to commit immediately but they’re honest about their intentions.

After a few weeks or months of things going well between you, they should want to label the relationship.

5. He’s flaky and unreliable

If they’re flaky, constantly cancel, always make excuses about how busy they are, and refuse to make plans, they might be a player.

One participant in a study of breadcrumbing described the excuses. “They are not willing to communicate, and then they make excuses and get out of it” (Khattar et al., 2023).

A player doesn’t put you first. They always prioritize their self-interest. So, if a better option comes along, they’ll have no issue canceling on you. They only put effort into seeing you when they want something.

Warning Signs

• Constantly cancels plans last minute
• Always says he’s too busy to meet
• Only makes effort when he wants something

How a committed person would behave

A truly interested person sticks to plans and keeps their promises. If they can’t make it, they let you know respectfully and reschedule immediately.

6. Vague about His life

A player will keep his life and past vague and secretive. They don’t tell you exactly where they’ve been or what they get up to when you’re not there. They’re also very protective over their phone.

They’re often quite closed off about their past and refuse to open up emotionally because they’re not interested in building a connection.

If they do open up, they’ll probably tell you a “poor me” story and always paint themselves as the victim.

Warning Signs

• Vague about his whereabouts and activities
• Secretive about his past
• Very protective over his phone

How a committed person would behave

When someone shares openly with you about their past and current life, they’re probably keen to build an emotional connection with you.

They discuss their work, friendship, social life, hobbies, and past experiences with you openly because they want you to get to know them. And they want to get to know you too.

7. He Disrespects and Crosses Your Boundaries

A player is driven by self-interest so if your boundaries get in the way of that, they will push against them.

For example, if you say you don’t want to get physical, they might try to convince you otherwise.

Or, if you don’t want to go to certain places, drink alcohol, or discuss certain topics, they might not respect that and try to change your mind.

Warning Signs

• Pressures you to do things you’re not comfortable with
• Ignores or tries to change your stated boundaries

How a committed person would behave

A person who cares about you will also care about your boundaries. So, if you say, for example, you don’t want to have sex or go to their house, they will respect that.

They will also have their own boundaries and expect you to accept those.

8. Big Difference in Public vs Private Behavior

One way of telling whether someone’s a player is by paying attention to how they act when you’re alone versus in public.

If they’re very affectionate and loving in private but become distant in public, this is a potential red flag.

Maybe they’re not comfortable being affectionate in public. However, if they’re very flirty with others in front of you and deny your existence, it’s more likely they’re a player. They want to seem single.

Warning Signs

• Very affectionate in private but distant in public
• Flirts with others in front of you
• Acts like you don’t exist when you’re out together

How a committed person would behave

Their behavior in public and private is mostly consistent. Even if they don’t like being affectionate in public, you still get the feeling that they only have eyes for you.

9. Your relationship is a secret

A player isn’t interested in building something serious with you, so they won’t introduce you to their friends and family.

They might not want to be seen with you in public in case you run into one of their other flings.

Even after several weeks or months, you feel like they want to keep your relationship a secret.

How a committed person would behave

When someone is interested in you, they’ll tell their friends and family about your relationship. It’s normal not to tell everyone when you’ve only just met but once things are going somewhere, there’s no reason to hide it.

10. His social media is private

If someone refuses to connect with you on social media and doesn’t post pictures of you together, it could mean they’re a player. Following a lot of women might be another red flag.

Some people don’t use or post on social media very much, in which case it might not mean anything if they don’t post about you.

However, if they’re generally quite active and refuse to acknowledge you on their account, it could mean they want to seem single to the world.

How a committed person would behave

Someone with genuine intentions has no need to be shady about their social media activity and is happy to make your relationship official publicly.

11. Manipulation and mind games

Manipulation is a common sign of a player because they’re trying to get what they want (sex or attention) as quickly as possible and then vanish.

They might be very charming and affectionate at the beginning and move very quickly. It can feel intense, fast. This is also known as love bombing: an intense burst of early attention and flattery meant to win your trust fast.

Their mind games might also include gaslighting (making you doubt your own memory or perception of events), blaming, hot-and-cold behavior, and breadcrumbing.

Warning Signs

• Hot and Cold: Super affectionate one moment, distant the next.
• Gaslighting: Makes you question your own perceptions.
• Breadcrumbing: Gives you just enough attention to keep you interested.

How a committed person would behave

When a person is interested in a relationship, they want to be real and honest with you and not play mind games.

In Their Own Words

Relationship therapist Esther Perel has worked with daters navigating apps, ambiguity, and repeated short-lived connections. As Perel explains, someone who keeps “the next potential candidate” lined up never has to feel one connection fade out.

Curiosity about who comes next can substitute for real investment in any one person (Perel, What We All Need to Know About Modern Dating).

First-hand accounts back this up. In a study of a closely related pattern called breadcrumbing, one participant described exactly the mismatch this guide is about.

“He just wanted my attention whenever he felt alone or bored, but he never came to help me when I felt alone,” one participant recalled (Khattar et al., 2023).

Another put it simply: “when you look the world through rose-coloured glasses, even the red flag looks like a normal flag” (Khattar et al., 2023).

Why Do People Play Games in Relationships?

There are many reasons why people play games in relationships, ranging from insecurity and fear of intimacy to lack of empathy and enjoying the thrill of manipulation.

Some do it consciously, while others probably don’t understand the full impact of their actions.

Five explanations come up most often:

• Fear and Insecurity: Low self-esteem, fear of rejection, or a need for validation.
• Ludus: A game-playing love style that avoids deep emotional involvement.
• Narcissism: Self-interest and a strong need to be admired.
• Pick-Up Artistry: Manipulative techniques learned from pick-up literature.
• Avoidant Attachment: Emotional distance as self-protection, which can look like playing games.

1. Fear and Insecurity

Some game players may have low self-esteem, deep-rooted insecurity, and fear of intimacy.

They might fear rejection, so by keeping the other person at arm’s length, they can protect themselves from being rejected first.

Others might play games to receive validation and reassurance. They manipulate people and situations to boost their egos.

This idea has some longitudinal backing, though not from dating research. Pu and Gan (2026) followed 294 adolescents aged 15–18 over about fourteen months.

They measured social ostracism (being excluded by peers), loneliness, and the Dark Triad, a cluster of three manipulative personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy.

Early ostracism predicted later Dark Triad traits. Loneliness helped explain the link. The authors argued that these traits can develop partly as a coping response to prolonged rejection, rather than being fixed by genetics alone.

2. Ludus: Love is a Game

Most players practice ludus, the ancient Greeks’ term for a playful, game-playing approach to love. It avoids deep emotional involvement or commitment.

Ludus is one of six love styles. Psychologists measure them with the Love Attitudes Scale (Hendrick & Hendrick, 1986).

People high in ludus prefer short-term, casual relationships and often juggle multiple partners at once. The thrill is in the pursuit, not the connection.

The style is linked empirically to dark triad traits: narcissism (a need for admiration), Machiavellianism (strategic manipulation of others), and psychopathy (low empathy and callousness). People high in these traits use charm to draw partners in with no real intention of intimacy or commitment.

Jonason and Kavanagh (2010) tested the link in 100 undergraduates. They completed a love-style questionnaire and a short Dark Triad measure.

Ludus and eros (passionate love with low commitment) were both linked to all three traits. Committed styles such as agape were linked to lower scores. Men scored higher than women on both ludus and Dark Triad traits.

For them, it’s about control, thrill, and seeking admiration. Because empathy is low, they feel little guilt about how this treats the other person.

3. Narcissism

Narcissism is part of the dark triad so it’s no surprise that narcissists tend to be game-players driven by self-interest and a desire to be admired.

Narcissistic love is confusing at best but often has devastating and dangerous consequences for its victims. It’s therefore important to know and understand the signs of narcissistic love.

4. He’s a Pick-Up Artist

Pick-up artists are men who felt socially and romantically inadequate. They turned to certain literature to learn how to “get” women, often in toxic and unhealthy ways.

In other words, they were unsuccessful in dating, so they learned how to be players.

A famous example is Neil Strauss’s book The Game. It’s a memoir. Strauss documents his transformation from being shy and socially awkward around women to becoming a self-described master of the “game.”

The book describes pickup artistry as social hacking: using psychological techniques to manipulate interactions with women. Intent varies, though.

Some men who follow this advice are looking for real love.

Most, though, use these techniques specifically to manipulate women into having sex with them. That’s where the term “pick-up artists” comes from.

Common techniques include:

• Negging: Backhanded compliments.
• Peacocking: Deliberately conspicuous dress or accessories.
• Opening and Closing: Rehearsed lines used to close the deal.

5. Avoidant Attachment Style

People with an avoidant attachment style may display some of the same behaviors as a player. Avoidant attachment is a pattern, formed from early relationships, in which someone manages closeness by staying independent and emotionally distant.

It’s not the same as playing games.

They can be a bit hot and cold, shy away from sharing personal details, struggle to express their emotions, and don’t like commitment.

That doesn’t necessarily make them players, it could just show their need for independence and self-protection as a result of their early relationships.

However, a person with an avoidant attachment who manipulates and has low empathy could be a player.

So, are they a player or just avoidant?

Here are a few signs that someone is avoidant, rather than playing games:

• Regular Contact: They stay in touch, even when they pull back.
• Slow Start: They take things slowly instead of coming on strong.
• No Favors: They rarely ask for favors early on.

They’re in touch regularly

Although avoidants shun commitment, they will still communicate with you regularly.

They might pull back when things start to feel “too serious” for them, but they won’t only contact you if they want something.

They won’t come on too strong

Players often come on very strong from the beginning (lovebombing, showing extreme interest, holding deep eye contact, etc.) to win you over quickly, get their way, and leave.

An avoidant person struggles to make emotional connections early on, so they’ll be more reserved and take things slow, especially at first.

They don’t ask for favors

Asking for help is a sign of weakness for avoidantly attached people.

So, if someone is asking you for stuff early on (like borrowing money), they’re probably taking advantage of you.

How Reliable Are These Signs?

These three signs are a guide, not a proven test. Research has not yet directly tested whether they separate players from avoidantly attached people.

The idea builds on Bartholomew and Horowitz’s (1991) four-category model of adult attachment. Dismissive-avoidant people see themselves positively and others negatively. They actively avoid closeness. Fearful-avoidant people see both themselves and others negatively, so they avoid closeness while still wanting it.

Newer research blurs the line further. Cole and Stonebrook (2025) built a scale of seven motives for deceiving a romantic partner, from privacy protection to malicious intent. Avoidant attachment tracked motives of distance and autonomy. Unexpectedly, anxious attachment also tracked malicious intent.

Telling the two apart takes real attention to detail.

Critical Evaluation

Not every person who shows one of these signs is deliberately playing games. The explanations above cover different ground, from insecurity and a game-playing love style to narcissism and avoidant attachment, and they aren’t interchangeable.

Even within the best-supported explanation, the picture is messy. Jonason and Kavanagh (2010), the study linking ludus to Dark Triad traits, also found that eros, a passionate but still low-commitment style, showed the same link.

How Reliable Is the Evidence?

Direct research on the “player” label barely exists. It’s a term from dating culture, not a construct any psychologist set out to measure by that name.

The closest studies rest on small samples:

• Ghani (2011): Interviewed 12 people about how they understood the “player” identity.
• Khattar et al. (2023): Interviewed 9 people about breadcrumbing, leading someone on with occasional attention.
• Jauk et al. (2016): Used 90 speed-daters, the largest study linking personality to real dating success.

None of these studies can say how common “player” behavior actually is. They’re small. The eleven warning signs above are a useful, plausible pattern, not a validated checklist.

This evidence base isn’t narrowly Western, though. The closest qualitative studies were conducted in India (Khattar et al., 2023) and in Canada (Ghani, 2011).

That matters. The usual criticism that psychology leans too heavily on Western samples applies less cleanly here. It doesn’t map as neatly onto the wider personality and attachment research this pattern draws on.

Gendered Assumptions Worth a Second Look

“Player” is a label applied mostly to men, and that gendered use is real. That’s not in dispute. But a large 2023 study of 923 people (Kennair et al.) found little evidence of a simple double standard around promiscuity.

What it did find instead was hypocrisy.

People judged their own dating history more harshly than they judged the same history in a friend of the same sex. That effect was, if anything, stronger in women than in men.

There’s a wrinkle here, too. Ghani’s (2011) interview participants confirmed the identity is understood differently depending on who’s doing the labeling.

That complicates the idea that recognizing a “player” is mainly about correcting a bias against women. It’s more tangled than that. The judgment at work looks more self/other-dependent than a simple double standard.

Is It Just a Mating Strategy?

Evolutionary psychology offers a less judgmental explanation. Buss and Schmitt’s (1993) sexual strategies theory proposes that humans, and men in particular, evolved separate strategies for short-term and long-term mating.

On this view, a short-term strategy is not a disorder. It can be adaptive under some conditions, for example when the costs of long-term investment outweigh the benefits. The problem is concealment. A partner is led to expect something else.

Amarakoon et al. (2025) surveyed 747 single adults, then 483 more in a replication. Singles in casual sexual relationships, most often with a friend, reported:

• Less attachment avoidance and anxiety than sexually inactive singles
• Less fear of being single
• Higher sexual satisfaction
• No difference in life satisfaction or depressive symptoms

Openly pursuing casual sex is not itself a marker of insecurity or distress. Khattar et al.’s (2023) breadcrumbing participants, who were misled about intent, reported lasting trust issues and anxiety.

Across the two studies, the concealed intent, not casual sex itself, seems to track the harm. That is the line the “player” label draws.

Contemporary Research

Newer studies test the personality-trait picture beyond self-report. Jauk et al. (2016) had 90 people speed-date and rate each other’s appeal.

Narcissism predicted being rated as appealing for both short-term and long-term relationships, in both men and women. The advantage came from different sources. In men, narcissism overlapped with extraversion. In women, it overlapped with physical attractiveness.

Psychopathy (low empathy and callousness, measured as a personality trait rather than a diagnosis) predicted short-term appeal too, but only in women.

The charm advantage has not always replicated, though. Dragostinov and Booth (2025) showed participants fictitious partners described as low, medium, or high in Dark Triad traits. Each description came with a face matched for physical attractiveness.

The two studies pointed in opposite directions:

• Study 1 (475 people): Those attracted to men rated medium levels most appealing for short-term relationships.
• Study 2 (794 people): With randomized pairings, both men and women rated low levels most attractive, for short-term and long-term relationships alike.

The authors suggested Dark Triad traits may not be attractive unless they come with physical attractiveness. Charm alone may not carry a player.

A separate two-year study of dating-app users found the relationship runs both ways. Freyth (2022) followed 82 users and found that continued app use was linked to rising narcissism and Machiavellianism over time, not just the reverse. Machiavellianism means a cynical, strategic approach to dealing with people.

In other words, a dating environment built around rapid evaluation and replacement of partners may not just attract game-players. It may help create them.

App design may play a part. Philosopher Nader (2025) argues that swipe-based apps such as Tinder are built like games. They offer a clear goal, a running score (the match count), and constant, low-effort rewards. That design rewards collecting matches over building a connection.

Does a Player Always Keep Playing?

The advice in the next section says a player will keep playing. That is stated very firmly, with no allowance for context.

Context matters. Gaslighting and blame-shifting are also recognized parts of coercive control. Advice that suits an emotionally unavailable partner may not be safe if someone faces active manipulation or intimidation.

Khattar et al.’s (2023) participants also reported direct confrontation as one of the least consistently effective ways to cope. Therapy and self-work worked better.

Population data complicate the claim that a player never changes. Shimotsukasa and Oshio (2026) followed 188,296 Japanese adults aged 15 to 102 across up to seven annual waves.

Narcissism and psychopathy rose in young adulthood, then flattened and declined by the mid-sixties. Each trait also became more stable with age, so a person’s rank among peers got harder to shift.

So “they will keep playing” may hold within one relationship. It overstates what we know about whether the trait is fixed for life.

Dealing with a Player

If you’ve realized your love interest is a player, what you do to deal with them depends on what your intentions are.

Consider whether you’re happy with a casual thing or whether you want something more serious. If you’re happy to just have fun, go for it. Just be honest with yourself about what you truly want.

If you’re looking for something more serious and don’t want to play games, it’s probably best to remove the player from your life.

Here’s some advice:

• Expectations: A player rarely changes because you stay or try harder.
• Boundaries: Say clearly what you want and what you won’t accept.
• Leaving: If you want commitment, step away rather than trying to win them over.
• Self-Worth: Don’t accept mistreatment as normal or deserved.

1. Manage Your Expectations

If they’re a player, they will continue to play, with you or without you. People don’t change for the sake of other people; they only change when they decide it’s in their best interest.

Some people believe that if they have sex with someone often enough, it’ll make them love them, but that’s rarely true.

Either they like you or they don’t, regardless of sex.

You can’t stop people from playing games, but you can remove yourself: players can only play their games if you play along.

2. Implement Boundaries

If you want something serious and suspect they’re playing games, talk to them about it directly. Set your boundaries clearly.

For example, you might say, “I won’t sleep with you until you commit to me.” Or: “Until things are clearer, I can’t keep seeing you.”

Even in a casual arrangement you’re happy with, strong boundaries still matter.

You might not want to meet at certain places, or prefer they don’t text you at 2am. Or you might not want them meeting your friends or asking about certain topics.

Communicate your limits clearly. If they don’t respect them, that’s your cue to draw the line.

3. Leave If You Want Commitment

If you want commitment, you’re much better off leaving them and finding a partner who appreciates and respects you.

Even if you do everything in your power to be the perfect match for the player, they won’t stop playing.

Feeling rejected is painful, and you might want to prove you’re good enough for them. That’s worth remembering. But it’s a losing game: you were never the issue, they are.

4. Know Your Worth

If they’re just playing games with you, my advice is: don’t give them the validation of knowing that they hurt you. Just move on peacefully.

Sometimes our own insecurities can drive us to seek out partners who confirm the negative beliefs we have about ourselves.

You might subconsciously believe you deserve to be treated badly, and therefore accept this kind of behavior as normal.

But it’s time to understand your worth and end the negative cycle. You deserve to be treated with respect. Never settle for someone who makes you feel small and insignificant.

Their insecurities shouldn’t make you question your worth. Raise your standards and find a person who values you.

Further reading

Why do guys act rude when they like you?

• Drescher, A. (2024). Narcissistic Love Bombing Cycle: Idealize, Devalue, Discard. https://www.simplypsychology.org/narcissistic-love-bombing-cycle.html
• Drescher, A. (2023). Common Narcissistic Love Patterns. https://www.simplypsychology.org/common-narcissistic-love-patterns.html#:~:text=Narcissistic%20relationships%20typically%20involve%20three,while%20satisfying%20their%20own%20needs.
• Drescher, A. (2024). Examples of Mind Games in Dating and Relationships. https://www.simplypsychology.org/mind-games-dating.html
• Drescher, A. (2024). Tips for Setting Dating Boundaries. https://www.simplypsychology.org/dating-boundaries.html

Sources

Amarakoon, A., Latimer, N., MacDonald, G., & Dawson, S. J. (2025). Who is “doing it”? Casual sex and wellbeing in singlehood. Personal Relationships, 32(4), Article e70045. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.70045

Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204

Cole, T., & Stonebrook, K. (2025). Deceptive hearts: Insecure attachment and motives underlying deception in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 32(3), Article e70020. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.70020

Dragostinov, Y., & Booth, T. (2025). The (un)attractiveness of Dark Triad personalities: Assessing fictitious characters for short- and long-term relationships. Journal of Personality, 93(5), 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12994

Freyth, L. (2022). Dating app users after two years: A Dark Triad amplification. Studia Psychologica: Theoria et Praxis, 22(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2022.22.1.02

Ghani, F. (2011). Gendered Emotional Manipulation: An Investigation of Male and Female Perceptions of the Player Identity in Romantic Relationships [Master’s thesis, University of Ottawa] https://ruor.uottawa.ca/items/5a6b5d88-0ecf-4b00-be9c-08d01242e460

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392

Jauk, E., Neubauer, A. C., Mairunteregger, T., Pemp, S., Sieber, K. P., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2016). How alluring are dark personalities? The Dark Triad and attractiveness in speed dating. European Journal of Personality, 30(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2040

Jonason, P. K., & Kavanagh, P. (2010). The dark side of love: Love styles and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.030

Kennair, L. E. O., Thomas, A. G., Buss, D. M., & Bendixen, M. (2023). Examining the sexual double standards and hypocrisy in partner suitability appraisals within a Norwegian sample. Evolutionary Psychology, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14747049231165687

Khattar, V., Upadhyay, S., & Navarro, R. (2023). Young adults’ perception of breadcrumbing victimization in dating relationships. Societies, 13(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13020041

Nader, K. (2025). The gamification of dating online. Theoria, 91(3), Article e12549. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12549

Perel, E. What We All Need to Know About Modern Dating [Where Should We Begin? episode, YouTube]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEvy9Il-2Kc

Pu, J., & Gan, X. (2026). The potential roles of social ostracism and loneliness in the development of Dark Triad traits in adolescents: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 94(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.13018

Shimotsukasa, T., & Oshio, A. (2026). Age-graded stability and change in Dark Triad traits: Seven-wave evidence from a large Japanese panel, with Big Five benchmarks. Journal of Personality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.70097